Know case of carcinoma prostate, bilateral Architectomy. Full stop. Status post palliative RT. Full stop. Status post six cycles of chemotherapy. Full stop. Now on tab abiraterone. Patient got, uh... Uh, PET-CT dis... PSMA PET-CT is done, which is compared with the previous PET-CT, which is PSMA scan done in... Last year, September 2025. No. The primary lesion appears to be, uh, showing PSMA activity more or less same, but there is one lytic sclerotic lesion in, uh, right rib. Which is showing, uh, ASB max of five in the present scan versus 3.5 in the previous scan. Uh, I see subtle increase in sclerosis. Can this be a flare phenomenon that is why the Suv max values have increased?

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

PSMA PET flare prostate cancer

Searching the Web

PSMA PET response assessment flare phenomenon bone metastases prostate cancer abiraterone guidelines

Yes, it can represent a flare or treatment-related PSMA-expression change, but this cannot be concluded from SUVmax alone.
  • The right rib lesion has increased uptake from SUVmax 3.5 to 5, with subtly increased sclerosis on CT.
  • Increasing sclerosis in a previously involved bone lesion can reflect osteoblastic healing/remodeling, particularly if the patient is clinically well and PSA/ALP are improving.
  • With androgen-receptor pathway treatment such as abiraterone, PSMA expression can transiently rise after treatment initiation, causing increased tracer uptake despite antitumor activity. This effect is generally described early, often within weeks after starting or changing systemic treatment. A review of flare in prostate cancer notes that evidence for a sustained PSMA-PET flare with abiraterone is inconsistent, and one small study found no flare at a median of 3 months (review of flare evidence).
Timing is the key issue:
  • If abiraterone was started or changed only recently, especially in the previous 4-12 weeks, this isolated rise could plausibly be flare/pseudoprogression.
  • If the patient has been on stable abiraterone for several months and the scan is a year after the prior scan, a new or progressively PSMA-avid lesion is more concerning for active/progressing metastasis, even though increasing sclerosis may still indicate a healing component.
An SUVmax rise from 3.5 to 5 is not by itself proof of progression. It can be influenced by scanner/tracer differences, injected dose, uptake interval, reconstruction, and lesion size. PSMA-PET response assessment should integrate:
  1. PSA trend, preferably serial values
  2. ALP and other biochemical trend
  3. New bone pain or worsening analgesic requirement
  4. Number and distribution of new/increasing PSMA-avid lesions
  5. CT morphology, particularly whether sclerosis is increasing without a destructive soft-tissue component
  6. Whether both scans used the same tracer, scanner/protocol, and similar uptake time
In the situation described, with stable primary uptake and only one equivocal rib lesion, I would word it as indeterminate for progression versus treatment-related flare/healing change, rather than definite progression. If PSA is falling/stable and there are no clinical symptoms, it is reasonable for the treating oncology and nuclear-medicine teams to avoid changing systemic therapy solely on this single SUV change and consider short-interval reassessment, often around 8-12 weeks, using PSA plus repeat imaging if needed.
A useful report-style impression could be:
“Mild interval increase in PSMA avidity of the right rib mixed lytic-sclerotic lesion with subtle increase in sclerosis. In the setting of ongoing systemic therapy, this may represent treatment-related PSMA-expression flare and/or osteoblastic healing response; however, metabolically active residual/progressive osseous metastasis cannot be excluded. Correlate with PSA, serum ALP, clinical status, treatment timing, and consider follow-up imaging.”
The uncertainty reflects a real limitation: PSMA uptake reflects both tumor burden and PSMA expression, and early antiandrogen therapy can alter expression independent of disease progression. Current PSMA-PET response literature also emphasizes that SUV changes should not be interpreted in isolation (PSMA-PET response review).

Psa value is < 0.006

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

prostate cancer PSMA PET PSA response abiraterone

Searching the Web

PCWG3 prostate cancer progression PSA bone lesion flare abiraterone PSMA PET

A PSA <0.006 ng/mL is an excellent deep biochemical response. In this context, an isolated increase in PSMA uptake in one rib lesion, with increasing sclerosis and no described new lesions, is much more likely to be treatment-related change/healing or residual PSMA expression than clinically meaningful systemic progression.
Key interpretation:
  • Do not call progression solely from SUVmax 3.5 to 5.0. SUV is affected by technical differences between scans and, on abiraterone/androgen suppression, by altered PSMA expression.
  • The subtle increase in sclerosis supports an osteoblastic healing response. Bone healing can coexist with persistent or temporarily increased PET tracer uptake.
  • The very low PSA strongly argues against active bulk adenocarcinoma progression, assuming the PSA has remained suppressed on serial measurements and the patient is clinically stable.
  • Current proposed PSMA-PET response criteria emphasize that change in lesion avidity alone does not define progression. Progression is driven principally by confidently new lesions, usually in an appropriate clinical context (PCWG4 recommendations).
I would favor the following impression:
Single right rib metastasis demonstrates mildly increased PSMA avidity with increased sclerosis. Given undetectable PSA and sclerotic evolution, findings favor healing-related osseous flare/therapy-related modulation of PSMA expression or stable treated disease. Isolated metabolically active residual disease cannot be entirely excluded. No convincing PSMA-PET evidence of systemic disease progression.
Practical approach:
  1. Continue abiraterone and ongoing androgen deprivation unless there is other evidence of progression.
  2. Check serial PSA, alkaline phosphatase, clinical symptoms, and ensure castrate testosterone if relevant.
  3. Compare whether both scans used the same PSMA tracer, scanner, uptake time, and reconstruction protocol.
  4. If clinically needed, repeat imaging in about 8-12 weeks or at the next planned restaging interval rather than declaring progression now.
  5. If there is focal rib pain, fracture risk, or equivocal CT morphology, targeted CT or MRI can help distinguish healing sclerosis from structural progression.
The main caveat is that PSA-negative progression can rarely occur with dedifferentiated/neuroendocrine transformation, but that would usually be accompanied by a more convincing pattern such as new/progressive lesions, visceral disease, symptoms, or discordant CT progression, not only this one mildly more avid sclerosing rib focus.

Patient C/o gait instability and no other complaints. His hearing, behaviour, bladder and bowel habits all are normal, gets a pet ct brain done. Scan shows diffuse hypometabolism in cerebellum and pons and medulla. What are the possible reasons can be given

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

FDG PET cerebellar hypometabolism ataxia

Searching the Web

FDG PET diffuse cerebellar brainstem hypometabolism gait ataxia differential diagnosis

Assuming this was an FDG brain PET/CT, diffuse hypometabolism involving the cerebellum, pons, and medulla localizes well with the patient’s gait instability and suggests a cerebello-ponto-medullary process. It is not a diagnosis by itself, and it should be correlated urgently with a good MRI brain.

Important possible explanations

  1. Multiple-system atrophy, cerebellar type (MSA-C) / olivopontocerebellar degeneration
    • This is a leading neurodegenerative pattern when FDG PET shows combined cerebellar and pontine hypometabolism.
    • Autonomic symptoms such as urinary dysfunction, postural hypotension, erectile dysfunction, constipation, and REM-sleep behavior disorder may be absent early. Normal bladder function does not exclude early MSA-C.
    • The textbook library specifically notes that olivopontocerebellar degeneration/MSA-C can show marked pontine and cerebellar hypometabolism. FDG-PET literature similarly describes distributed cerebellar-pontine hypometabolism in MSA (cerebellar-disease imaging consensus).
  2. Hereditary or sporadic cerebellar ataxia
    • Spinocerebellar ataxias, especially SCA1, SCA2, SCA3 and SCA36, can produce cerebellar hypometabolism that extends to the pons and brainstem.
    • Family history may be absent because of late onset, reduced penetrance, or an unrecognized affected relative.
    • Normal hearing makes SCA36 less characteristic, but does not rule out other SCAs. In an established ataxic state, several SCAs demonstrate cerebellar and brainstem hypometabolism (FDG-PET movement-disorder review).
  3. Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration or immune-mediated cerebellar ataxia
    • In a patient with cancer and a subacute gait disorder, this must be actively excluded.
    • Prostate adenocarcinoma is an uncommon cause, but paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes can occur with many malignancies. Consider antibodies such as anti-Yo, Hu, Ri, Ma2, CV2/CRMP5, amphiphysin, and anti-Tr/DNER, along with autoimmune ataxia antibodies including GAD65, depending on the clinical setting.
    • PET may show cerebellar metabolic abnormality before major structural changes are apparent on MRI.
    • This matters because potentially treatable causes should be identified promptly.
  4. Toxic, drug-related, alcohol-related, or nutritional cerebellar dysfunction
    • Review alcohol exposure and all medications carefully, including recent chemotherapy and non-oncology drugs.
    • Relevant potentially reversible causes include thiamine deficiency, vitamin B12 or vitamin E deficiency, copper deficiency, hypothyroidism, hepatic/uremic encephalopathy, and medication toxicity.
    • Chemotherapy-associated peripheral neuropathy may worsen gait, although it would not alone usually explain diffuse pontocerebellar FDG hypometabolism.
    • Abiraterone is not a classic cause of this particular PET pattern.
  5. Vascular disease
    • Posterior-circulation ischemia, multiple small infarcts, or chronic vertebrobasilar insufficiency can cause gait ataxia and reduced metabolism.
    • If the gait instability was sudden or developed over hours to a few days, posterior-circulation stroke should be excluded urgently, even if there are no speech, swallowing, or limb symptoms.
  6. Structural posterior-fossa pathology
    • Cerebellar/brainstem metastasis, leptomeningeal disease, hydrocephalus, inflammatory disease, or compression need MRI assessment.
    • Brain metastasis would more often cause a focal lesion rather than symmetric diffuse cerebellar, pontine, and medullary hypometabolism, but PET cannot safely exclude it.
  7. CANVAS or sensory/vestibular ataxia syndromes
    • CANVAS, caused commonly by biallelic RFC1 expansion, produces cerebellar ataxia with sensory neuropathy and bilateral vestibular impairment.
    • On FDG PET, CANVAS often has cerebellar hypometabolism with relative preservation of the brainstem, so the reported prominent pons/medulla involvement makes MSA-C or an SCA relatively more compatible, though it is not definitive (CANVAS imaging series).

What should be done next

  1. MRI brain with contrast, including diffusion-weighted imaging and detailed posterior-fossa sequences. Look for cerebellar or pontine atrophy, the MSA-C “hot-cross-bun” sign, infarction, metastasis, leptomeningeal enhancement, hydrocephalus, or demyelination.
  2. Formal neurologic examination: cerebellar signs, eye movements/nystagmus, dysarthria, pyramidal signs, neuropathy, and vestibular function.
  3. Document the time course:
    • Hours to days: vascular, toxic, infectious
    • Weeks to months: paraneoplastic/autoimmune, nutritional, drug-induced
    • Slowly progressive over months to years: MSA-C, SCA, sporadic adult-onset ataxia
  4. Check orthostatic blood pressure and ask specifically about REM-sleep behavior disorder, constipation, erectile dysfunction, reduced sweating, and subtle urinary urgency/retention for early MSA.
  5. Blood tests: CBC, renal/liver profile, glucose, electrolytes, TSH, B12, folate, thiamine, vitamin E, copper/ceruloplasmin, and consider HIV/syphilis testing where clinically appropriate.
  6. If onset is subacute or MRI is unrevealing, involve neurology early for serum plus CSF autoimmune/paraneoplastic testing, CSF cytology if leptomeningeal disease is a concern, nerve-conduction studies, and targeted genetic testing such as RFC1/SCA panel when indicated.

Bottom line

The PET pattern is most suggestive of a cerebellar degenerative disorder involving the pontine pathways, with MSA-C/olivopontocerebellar degeneration and spinocerebellar ataxia high on the imaging differential. However, in this cancer patient with new gait instability, posterior circulation stroke, paraneoplastic/autoimmune cerebellar syndrome, and reversible toxic-nutritional causes must be ruled out before labeling it neurodegenerative. Normal hearing, behavior, and bladder/bowel habits narrow the phenotype but do not exclude these conditions.

MRI brain , pure tone audiometry are normal. They were suspecting some inner ear problem.

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

vestibular dysfunction normal audiometry gait instability

Searching the Web

normal audiometry vestibular hypofunction gait instability diagnostic tests vHIT caloric VEMP guideline

A normal MRI brain and normal pure-tone audiometry are reassuring, but they do not confirm or exclude a vestibular, or inner-ear balance, disorder.
Pure-tone audiometry tests cochlear hearing, not vestibular function. A patient can have normal hearing with unilateral or bilateral vestibular hypofunction. The textbook literature specifically recognizes vestibular disorders with normal hearing, and recommends vestibular examination beyond audiometry. Vestibular testing may include videonystagmography, positional testing, caloric testing, and vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials.
However, the reported FDG-PET pattern of diffuse cerebellar plus pons/medulla hypometabolism is not a typical signature of an isolated peripheral inner-ear disorder. It is more compatible with involvement of central vestibulo-cerebellar and brainstem networks, although posterior-fossa PET assessment must be interpreted carefully because it is technically less reliable than MRI and can be affected by acquisition, attenuation-correction, blood glucose, sedation, and image-processing factors.

Practical interpretation

There are two possibilities:
  1. A true peripheral vestibular problem
    • May cause unsteadiness, especially while walking in the dark, on uneven ground, or with rapid head movement.
    • Hearing can remain normal, as in vestibular neuritis, bilateral vestibular hypofunction, vestibular migraine, and some cases of Ménière disease.
    • It does not usually explain a convincing diffuse pontocerebellar hypometabolic PET pattern.
  2. An early central gait/ataxia syndrome
    • MSA-C, spinocerebellar ataxia, autoimmune/paraneoplastic ataxia, nutritional/metabolic causes, or less commonly a treatment-associated neurologic problem can produce gait instability before conventional MRI shows atrophy or a lesion.
    • The combined pons-cerebellum pattern means this possibility should not be dismissed purely because MRI is normal.

Next appropriate tests

Referral to a neuro-otologist or neurologist for a formal vestibular and neurologic examination is more informative than repeating audiometry.
Recommended vestibular testing:
  • Video head impulse test (vHIT): assesses all semicircular canals and vestibulo-ocular reflex.
  • Videonystagmography (VNG) with positional testing and caloric testing.
  • cVEMP and oVEMP: assess otolith organ pathways.
  • Dynamic visual acuity and posturography, if available.
A normal vHIT does not exclude vestibular dysfunction, and caloric testing can detect low-frequency vestibular deficits that vHIT may miss (vestibular-hypofunction diagnostic review).

Also important in this patient

Since he has had chemotherapy, assess for taxane-related peripheral neuropathy, which is a common non-central cause of unsteady gait. Examination and nerve-conduction studies can identify sensory neuropathy. Check:
  • Vibration/proprioception at toes and ankles
  • Reflexes
  • Romberg test
  • Nerve-conduction studies if signs suggest neuropathy
  • B12, thiamine, vitamin E, copper, TSH, glucose/HbA1c, renal/liver function, electrolytes including potassium and magnesium
Abiraterone can cause hypokalemia, which can cause weakness and worsen balance, though it would not specifically account for the PET pattern.

Clinical bedside clues

FeaturePeripheral vestibular cause more likelyCerebellar/central cause more likely
SensationVertigo, motion-provoked dizziness, oscillopsiaUnsteadiness without prominent vertigo
Head movementSymptoms worsen markedlyMay be less movement-dependent
RombergOften strongly positiveMay be unstable even with eyes open
NystagmusUsually unidirectional, suppressed by fixationDirection-changing, vertical, or gaze-evoked
Limb coordinationGenerally preservedDysmetria, dysdiadochokinesia, intention tremor
GaitVeering, worse in darkBroad-based ataxic gait
Bottom line: inner-ear dysfunction remains possible despite normal audiometry and MRI, but it should be demonstrated with vHIT, VNG/calorics, and VEMP. The PET finding should be reviewed with the nuclear-medicine physician and correlated with the neurologic examination; it should not by itself be labeled MSA-C or another degenerative disease. If gait instability is progressive, falls are occurring, or there are definite cerebellar signs, a neurology evaluation for central, immune-mediated/paraneoplastic, nutritional, and neuropathic causes remains appropriate.

+2 to -2 DS in Z score is normal. So, -0.57 is normal

Yes. A Z-score of -0.57 is within the normal range.
Using the usual reference range of approximately -2 to +2 standard deviations, -0.57 means the value is only 0.57 SD below the age-matched mean, which is not clinically abnormal.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.