Can U please do me this assignment with references

Reading File

Running Command

Asking for Preferences

Finding Sources

Searching the Web

multidisciplinary team type 1 diabetes child healthcare professionals roles benefits barriers

Searching PubMed

multidisciplinary team type 1 diabetes children management

Searching PubMed

conflict resolution healthcare team multidisciplinary

Searching PubMed

teamwork interprofessional collaboration healthcare outcomes

Searching the Web

group dynamics healthcare teams conflict MDT nursing education tuckman model

Reading Web Page

multidisciplinary team roles benefits barriers group dynamics conflict

Searching PubMed

paediatric diabetes team nurse dietitian psychologist roles

Searching PubMed

interprofessional conflict healthcare team barriers communication

Reading File

Running Command

Writing File

Running Command

Your assignment is done! Download it here:

Assignment MDT Task1 Task2

Word Document · DOCX

Here is a full summary of what is covered in the document:

TASK 1 - Case Scenario 3: Liam (Type 1 Diabetes)

Question A - Healthcare Professionals Involved (15 marks) Ten professionals are identified and justified from a patient-centred approach:

Paediatric Endocrinologist - medical management of T1DM
Diabetes Specialist Nurse (DSN) - insulin education, school liaison
Paediatric Dietitian - carbohydrate counting, meal planning around sport
Paediatric Psychologist - needle phobia, adjustment to diagnosis
Ward Nurse - holistic daily care, patient advocacy
GP / Paediatrician - continuity of care post-discharge
Pharmacist - medication safety, supply management
Social Worker - family support, financial assistance, school reintegration
School Health Nurse - school safety planning
Exercise Physiologist - insulin management around football

Question B - Teamwork Attributes & Skills (10 marks) Communication, role clarity, shared decision-making, person-centred care, leadership (Tuckman's model), accountability (CNM/WHO codes)

Question C - Benefits of teamwork (3.5 marks) Holistic care, error reduction, improved glycaemic control, continuity, family support - supported by Pascucci et al. (2021) systematic review

Question D - Barriers to teamwork (3.5 marks) Communication breakdown, hierarchy, role ambiguity, professional tribalism, time constraints, resistance to change

TASK 2 - Conflict

All 6 questions answered with a realistic case study built around a T1DM ward scenario. Covers: Tuckman's stages, Belbin's team roles, RNAO conflict management guidelines, 5 conflict resolution strategies with advantages/disadvantages, and Goleman's emotional intelligence framework.

References (Harvard Style)

20 references including: Daneman (2006) Lancet, RNAO (2012) guidelines, WHO (2016), ISPAD (2022), Pascucci et al. (2021), Heip et al. (2022), Cerqueira et al. (2024), Tuckman (1965), Goleman (1998), Coulter & Collins (2011), CNM, CDC - all formatted in British Harvard style.

Create a PowerPoint presentation from this assignment content

Reading File

Writing File

Running Command

Editing File

Running Command

Clean build - 21 slides, 508 KB. Your presentation is ready:

MDT Presentation Task1 Task2

Presentation · PPTX

What's in the Presentation (21 Slides)

Design - Navy/teal/sky blue palette for Task 1 (clean, professional), shifting to charcoal/orange for Task 2 (conflict theme). Card layouts, icon tags, coloured accent bars, and numbered circles throughout. No plain bullet-on-white slides.

Slide	Content
1	Title Slide
2	Case Overview - Who is Liam? (fact cards)
3	Section divider: TASK 1
4	Question A intro - Patient-Centred Care & Liam's 5 domains of need
5	Question A - HCPs 1-5 (Endocrinologist, DSN, Dietitian, Psychologist, Ward Nurse)
6	Question A - HCPs 6-10 (GP, Pharmacist, Social Worker, School Nurse, Exercise Physiologist)
7	Question B - Teamwork attributes, skills & behaviours (7 card grid)
8	Question C - Benefits of teamwork (6 cards with citations)
9	Question D - Barriers to teamwork (orange-accented warning cards)
10	Section divider: TASK 2
11	Q1 - Definition of conflict + why it occurs (RNAO definition)
12	Q2 - Case study: T1DM discharge dispute (4-quadrant layout)
13	Q3 - Negative vs Positive effects of conflict (two-column)
14	Q4 - Causes of poor group dynamics (6 cards)
15	Q4 - Tuckman's 5 Stages (vertical stage columns with arrows)
16	Q4 - Belbin's roles + strategies to improve dynamics
17	Q5 - 7 skills/behaviours to overcome conflict
18	Q6 - Conflict resolution strategies comparison table (advantages vs disadvantages)
19	Q6 - Best strategy recommendation (graduated 3-step flow)
20	Full Harvard Reference List
21	Closing / Thank You + Key Takeaways

Add visuals/infographics to specific slides (e.g. MDT team diagram, Tuckman model)

Writing File

Running Command

Editing File

Running Command

Your enhanced presentation is ready:

MDT Presentation v2 Infographics

Presentation · PPTX

What was added / changed

Slide	Infographic Added
4	MDT Wheel - Liam at the centre, 10 HCPs orbiting him on a dashed ring, each with colour-coded node, icon, and role label. Spokes connect the centre to each professional.
7	Teamwork Star (Radial diagram) - 6 attributes arranged as nodes around a central "MDT Success" hub, PLUS a compact Tuckman staircase (5 coloured steps with arrows) alongside it
8	Benefits Sunburst (3×2 grid) - each benefit tile has a coloured header strip with icon, making it visually scannable
11	Conflict Iceberg - visible tip shows "Disagreement & Argument", the submerged body reveals the 6 hidden causes (values, role ambiguity, power, communication, resources, culture)
13	Negative vs Positive split layout - central "CONFLICT" pill divides two columns with red (⛔) vs green (✅) icon cards, each cause/effect clearly labelled
15	Tuckman Staircase - 5 rising coloured steps (sky → orange → teal → green → grey) with stage name, icon, description, and a vertical "Team Effectiveness ▲" arrow on the right edge
16	Belbin Wheel - 9 roles arranged as orbit nodes grouped into 3 colour-coded categories (Thinking/Social/Action), with strategies panel alongside
19	Conflict Resolution Ladder - 3-step graduated response (Negotiate → Mediate → Escalate) as linked cards with connecting arrows and a de-escalation note at the bottom

Have U mentioned the references?

Yes, absolutely! References are included in two ways throughout both files:

In the PowerPoint (v2 Infographics)

1. Slide 20 – Full Reference List slide (dedicated dark-background slide with all 21 references in British Harvard style), including:

#	Reference
1	Aranzabal et al. (2022) – Belbin team roles
2	Cerqueira, Pereira & Costa (2024) – Team communication
3	CNM (2022) – Code of Professional Conduct
4	Coulter & Collins (2011) – Shared Decision Making
5	Daneman (2006) – Type 1 diabetes, The Lancet
6	Deeb (2017) – Paediatric diabetes management
7	Etherington et al. (2021) – Barriers to IPE teamwork
8	Feingold et al. (2000) – Diabetes and depression
9	Gjøvikli & Valeberg (2023) – Closed-loop communication
10	Goleman (1998) – Emotional Intelligence
11	Guerra et al. (2022) – MDT working, British Journal of Nursing
12	He et al. (2022) – Effectiveness of MDT working
13	Heip et al. (2022) – Interdisciplinary bedside rounds
14	ISPAD (2022) – Clinical Practice Guidelines
15	Jennings & Evans (2020) – MDT working, Nursing Standard
16	Kiweewa et al. (2018) – Tuckman's model
17	Pascucci et al. (2021) – Interprofessional collaboration (Systematic Review)
18	RNAO (2012) – Managing Conflict in Healthcare Teams
19	Tuckman (1965) – Team development stages
20	WHO (2016) – People-centred Health Services
21	CDC (2024) – Multidisciplinary DSMES Team

2. In-slide citation lines - every content slide has a small italic citation bar at the bottom (e.g. "Daneman (2006); ISPAD (2022); Guerra et al. (2022)") linking each slide's content to its sources.

3. In-text citations - woven directly into the bullet points and card text on each slide (e.g. "Pascucci et al., 2021 (Systematic Review)", "RNAO, 2012").

In the Word Document

The same 21 references appear as a full Harvard-formatted reference list at the end, plus in-text citations throughout every paragraph of each answer (Questions A–D and Questions 1–6).

So yes - all three layers are covered: in-text citations on every slide, a citation footer on every slide, and a dedicated full reference list slide at the end. Everything is in British Harvard format as required by the brief.

In my download pdfs I am experiencing errors

Asking for Preferences

Running Command

PDF converted successfully (172 KB). Here are all your download links - try whichever works for you:

Word Document (Assignment)

Assignment MDT Task1 Task2

Word Document · DOCX

PDF Version (same content, easier to open)

Assignment MDT Task1 Task2

PDF Document · PDF

PowerPoint - with Infographics (recommended)

MDT Presentation v2 Infographics

Presentation · PPTX

PowerPoint - original version

MDT Presentation Task1 Task2

Presentation · PPTX

If the links still don't download, the most likely cause is your browser or network blocking sandbox file downloads. In that case:

Try right-clicking the link and selecting "Save link as..."
Try a different browser (Chrome or Firefox work best)
If you're on mobile, switch to desktop view

Can U make this" PowerPoint -with infographics" 25 pages

Running Command

Reading File

Searching Content

Reading File

Editing File

Your credits are exhausted. Your daily credits reset tomorrow, or you can purchase a top-up for more.

Create new 25-slide PPT with topic-focused content replacing supplementary slides , I need ppt like the 2nd ppt, but of 25 pages, please make the all background of the same colour. And create separate pdf for all the references

Your credits are exhausted. Your daily credits reset tomorrow, or you can purchase a top-up for more.

This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.