as per title Comparative Efficacy of Aerobic Interval Training versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on heart rate Recovery, Myocardial Workload, Functional Capacity and Health-Related Quality of Life in Post-CABG Patients Undergoing Phase II Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. give me primary and secondary outcome measures,dependent and independent variables
aerobic interval training continuous training CABG cardiac rehabilitation
| Independent Variable | Groups |
|---|---|
| Type of exercise training | Group 1: Aerobic Interval Training (AIT) |
| Group 2: Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT) | |
| (Both delivered within Phase II Cardiac Rehabilitation post-CABG) |
| Dependent Variable | Measurement Tool/Method |
|---|---|
| Heart Rate Recovery (HRR) | Difference in HR at peak exercise minus HR at 1–2 minutes post-exercise (from exercise stress test / CPX test) |
| Myocardial Workload | Rate Pressure Product (RPP) = Heart Rate × Systolic Blood Pressure (measured at rest and peak exercise) |
| Functional Capacity | Peak VO₂ or MET level via cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET); or 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) distance |
| Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) | Validated questionnaire — typically SF-36, MacNew Heart Disease HRQoL, or EQ-5D |
In practice, researchers often designate one primary outcome to power the sample size calculation. Based on similar published trials (e.g., Shafiee et al., Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2023, PMID 36683497), peak VO₂ / functional capacity is the most commonly powered primary endpoint in CABG rehab RCTs.
| Category | Variable |
|---|---|
| Independent | Type of training (AIT vs. MICT) |
| Primary Dependent | Functional Capacity (Peak VO₂ / 6MWT); Heart Rate Recovery |
| Secondary Dependent | Myocardial Workload (RPP); HRQoL score |
| Controlled variables | Phase II CR setting, post-CABG patient population, session duration/frequency, time post-surgery |