I now have comprehensive information from Kanski's, StatPearls, EyeWiki, Review of Ophthalmology, and Retinal Physician. Let me compile the full structured response.
Reporting FFA for Choroidal Neovascular Membrane (CNVM) and Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy (PCV)
Part 1: FFA Reporting for CNVM (Macular Neovascularization / MNV)
A. Preparation & Technical Adequacy
Before reporting, note:
- Field of view: typically 30-40 degree stereoscopic images
- Phases captured: choroidal/pre-arterial, arterial, arteriovenous, venous, and late (recirculation) phase up to 10 minutes
- Image quality: adequacy of dye transit, media clarity, patient fixation
- Laterality: right eye / left eye, both eyes if bilateral
B. Classify the CNVM Type (MPS-Based Classification, still clinically used)
1. Classic CNVM (= Type 2 MNV)
- Early phase: well-defined, bright "lacy" or "wheel-within-a-wheel" pattern of hyperfluorescence appearing in the arterial or early arteriovenous phase (within first 30-60 seconds)
- Mid phase: progressive, intense hyperfluorescence with leakage expanding beyond the original borders over 1-2 minutes
- Late phase: persistent staining of fibrous tissue; boundaries become indistinct due to leakage into subretinal space
- Key report phrase: "Well-defined area of early hyperfluorescence with progressive leakage consistent with classic (Type 2) MNV"
2. Occult CNVM (= Type 1 MNV)
Two recognized subtypes:
a. Fibrovascular Pigment Epithelial Detachment (FV-PED)
- Early-mid phase (1-2 min): irregular, stippled or mottled hyperfluorescence with ill-defined borders at the level of the RPE
- Fluorescence persists or increases in intensity into the late phase without pooling
- Key report phrase: "Irregular stippled hyperfluorescence of undetermined extent appearing in the early-mid phase, consistent with fibrovascular PED (occult/Type 1 MNV)"
b. Late Leakage of Undetermined Source (LLUS)
- Early and mid phases: no discernible abnormality
- Late phase only (>2 min): poorly demarcated leakage at the level of RPE, appearing without any corresponding early-phase source
- Key report phrase: "Late-phase poorly demarcated leakage at the RPE level with no early-phase correlate, consistent with LLUS (occult MNV)"
3. Mixed CNVM (Predominantly Classic / Minimally Classic)
Based on proportion of total lesion area occupied by classic component:
| Subtype | Classic component % |
|---|
| Predominantly classic | >50% of total lesion area |
| Minimally classic | 1-49% of total lesion area |
| Occult with no classic | 0% classic component |
C. Lesion Characteristics to Report
Location Relative to Fovea
- Subfoveal: center of lesion involves the geometric center of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ)
- Juxtafoveal: lesion within 1-199 µm from the FAZ center (or within 200 µm of FAZ)
- Extrafoveal: lesion margin is ≥200 µm from the FAZ center
Lesion Size
- Greatest Linear Dimension (GLD): measured in disc areas (DA) or disc diameters (DD), or in microns on calibrated digital systems
- Measure from the frame where the CNV first becomes visible:
- Classic: earliest arterial frame where the lacy network appears
- Occult FV-PED: early-mid phase (1-2 min frame)
- LLUS: late-phase frame
- Report: "GLD approximately ___µm / ___DA"
Associated Non-CNV Lesion Components
Report each if present (measured separately; add to total lesion area):
- Elevated blocked fluorescence (hypofluorescent): due to blood, pigment, or fibrous tissue overlying or adjacent to CNV
- Thick blood: uniform blocked fluorescence without internal detail
- Serous PED: smooth dome-shaped hyperfluorescence with uniform pooling, well-demarcated borders, no leakage beyond the PED margins
- RPE atrophy / window defect: early hyperfluorescence persisting without change in intensity or size throughout the study (transmission defect)
- Fibrous scar/disciform: late staining without early leakage in an evolved lesion
Total Lesion Area
= Total CNV area + areas of each non-CNV component
D. Lesion Activity
- Active: progressive leakage increasing in intensity and area across phases
- Inactive / Fibrotic: staining without leakage; no progression across phases
- Hemorrhage: blocked fluorescence; note extent relative to lesion
E. Additional Features
- Feeder vessel (if visible): location and course
- Retinal angiomatous proliferation (Type 3 MNV): focal intraretinal hot spot, hairpin loop vessel on ICGA; FA resembles occult MNV
- Associated RPE tear: relative hypofluorescence over the folded flap + adjacent hyperfluorescence where RPE is absent
Part 2: FFA Reporting for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy (PCV)
Important Caveat on FFA vs. ICGA in PCV
FFA alone is insufficient to diagnose PCV. ICGA is the gold standard. On FFA, PCV lesions closely resemble occult CNVM, and submacular PCV is frequently mistaken for AMD. The longer wavelength of ICGA (~800 nm) penetrates the RPE better than fluorescein (~490 nm), allowing visualization of the branching vascular network (BVN) and polypoidal dilations. Reporting FFA in PCV is therefore done in conjunction with ICGA findings.
A. FFA Findings in PCV (What to Report)
| Finding | Appearance on FFA |
|---|
| Polypoidal lesions | Intense, localized area of hyperfluorescence (may resemble occult CNV) |
| Branching vascular network (BVN) | Not well-visualized; may appear as ill-defined hyperfluorescence |
| PED (pigment epithelial detachment) | Smooth dome-shaped pooling; multiple, often large |
| Peripheral notch sign | A notch at the margin of a serous PED may suggest location of a polyp |
| Sub-RPE or subretinal hemorrhage | Blocked (hypofluorescent) areas |
| RPE atrophy | Window defects (early persistent hyperfluorescence without leakage) |
| Neurosensory detachment / SRF | Pooling of dye in late phases |
| Leakage from BVN | Variable; used to classify PCV subtypes (see below) |
Key report phrase for PCV on FFA: "Occult-pattern hyperfluorescence with associated large PEDs and areas of blocked fluorescence; features are non-specific on FFA. ICGA is recommended for definitive characterization."
B. ICGA Findings in PCV (Essential for Complete Reporting)
Since ICGA is inseparable from PCV diagnosis, a complete report should address:
| Feature | Description |
|---|
| Branching vascular network (BVN) | Network of dilated choroidal vessels; best seen in early phase (first 6 minutes) |
| Polypoidal lesions | Hyperfluorescent nodules at the margins of the BVN; appear as grape-like or cluster-like dilations |
| Hypofluorescent halo | Dark ring surrounding the polyp in early phase (pathognomonic) |
| Pulsatile filling | Visible in dynamic ICGA (if performed) |
| Late geographic hyperfluorescence | Well-demarcated hyperfluorescent lesion appearing ~10 minutes post-injection; characteristic of PCV |
| Choroidal vascular hyperpermeability | Diffuse late choroidal hyperfluorescence |
PCV Diagnostic Criteria (ICGA-based): Focal hyperfluorescence (polyp) + at least one of: abnormal BVN, nodular appearance on stereoscopy, orange retinal nodule clinically, hypofluorescent halo, pulsatile polyp, or large submacular hemorrhage.
C. PCV Classification Based on FFA + ICGA (Tan et al.)
| PCV Type | Features |
|---|
| PCV with leaky BVN | BVN shows leakage on FFA; active exudation |
| PCV with interconnecting channels | Non-leaking BVN with visible channel interconnections |
| PCV with non-leaking BVN | BVN without leakage on FFA; often quiescent |
This classification has treatment implications - PDT is particularly effective for polyps, while anti-VEGF addresses leaky BVN.
D. Lesion Characterization in PCV (Report These Elements)
- Location: peripapillary (most common), macular, peripheral
- Number of polyps: single vs. multiple
- Cluster pattern: grape-like cluster carries higher risk of severe visual loss
- PED characteristics: number, size, type (serous, hemorrhagic), "double-hump" or "inverted V" sign
- Subretinal/sub-RPE hemorrhage: extent, proximity to fovea
- Greatest linear dimension (GLD): measured from combined FFA + ICGA (FFA alone may underestimate due to poor BVN visualization)
- Neurosensory detachment: presence and extent
- Activity: active leakage vs. quiescent
Part 3: Structured Reporting Template
For CNVM:
FFA Report - CNVM / MNV
Eye: R / L / Bilateral
Indication: Suspected MNV / follow-up post anti-VEGF
Technical adequacy: Adequate / Suboptimal (reason)
Phases captured: Choroidal / Arterial / Arteriovenous / Venous / Late (10 min)
FINDINGS:
1. CNV Type:
[ ] Classic (Type 2 MNV) — early lacy hyperfluorescence with progressive leakage
[ ] Occult - FV-PED (Type 1 MNV) — stippled early-mid phase hyperfluorescence
[ ] Occult - LLUS — late-phase leakage only
[ ] Mixed: predominantly classic / minimally classic
2. Lesion Location (relative to FAZ center):
[ ] Subfoveal [ ] Juxtafoveal (<200 µm) [ ] Extrafoveal (≥200 µm)
Distance from FAZ center: ___µm
3. Lesion Size:
GLD: ___µm / ___DA Total lesion area: ___DA
4. Non-CNV Lesion Components:
[ ] Elevated blocked fluorescence [ ] Thick blood
[ ] Serous PED [ ] RPE atrophy/window defect
[ ] Fibrous scar
5. Activity:
[ ] Active (progressive leakage) [ ] Inactive (staining only)
6. Hemorrhage: [ ] Present — extent ___ [ ] Absent
IMPRESSION:
[Type] MNV, [location] location, [size] GLD, [active/inactive].
Suggest ICGA if Type 1/PCV suspected.
For PCV:
FFA + ICGA Report - PCV
Eye: R / L / Bilateral
Indication: Suspected PCV / follow-up
FFA FINDINGS:
- PED: number ___, type (serous/hemorrhagic), size ___
- Polypoidal hyperfluorescence: present / absent
- Blocked fluorescence (hemorrhage): extent ___
- Window defects (RPE atrophy): present / absent
- Leakage pattern: occult-type / late leakage
ICGA FINDINGS:
- Branching vascular network (BVN): present / absent; location ___
- Polypoidal lesions: number ___, location (peripapillary / macular / peripheral)
- Hypofluorescent halo: present / absent (pathognomonic)
- Late geographic hyperfluorescence: present / absent
- Choroidal hyperpermeability: present / absent
- Cluster of polyps: present / absent
LESION CHARACTERIZATION:
- GLD (FFA + ICGA combined): ___µm / ___DA
- Neurosensory detachment: present / absent
- Sub-RPE hemorrhage: present / absent; extent ___
PCV CLASSIFICATION (Tan et al.):
[ ] PCV with leaky BVN
[ ] PCV with interconnecting channels
[ ] PCV with non-leaking BVN
ACTIVITY: Active / Quiescent
IMPRESSION:
Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy with [number] polyp(s) at [location],
[with/without] leaky BVN, GLD ___, [active/quiescent].
[Recommend PDT +/- anti-VEGF based on EVEREST-II protocol]
Key Distinguishing Points: CNVM vs. PCV on FFA
| Feature | Classic CNVM | Occult CNVM | PCV |
|---|
| Early-phase FFA | Bright lacy network | Stippled/mottled | Intense focal spot |
| Leakage pattern | Progressive, well-defined | Ill-defined, late | Mimics occult |
| PED | May be present | FV-PED type | Large, multiple, often hemorrhagic |
| Peripheral notch on PED | Absent | Absent | May be present (polyp clue) |
| ICGA | Hyperfluorescent membrane | Poorly defined | BVN + hypofluorescent halo around polyps |
| Definitive diagnosis | FFA sufficient | FFA + ICGA | ICGA mandatory |
| Drusen | Often present (AMD) | Often present | Typically absent |
Sources: Kanski's Clinical Ophthalmology 10th ed. (pp. 607-616); StatPearls - Fluorescein Angiography (NBK576378); EyeWiki - Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy; Review of Ophthalmology - FA in Neovascular AMD (MPS classification); Retinal Physician - Diagnosing and Managing PCV (2026)