Treatment for gpa as per this pdf only

Reading File
Running Command
Here is a comprehensive summary of Treatment for GPA (Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis) as per the EULAR 2022 recommendations (Hellmich et al., Ann Rheum Dis 2024;83:30-47):

Treatment of GPA - EULAR 2022 Recommendations


REMISSION INDUCTION

A. Organ-threatening or Life-threatening GPA (Recommendation 3)

  • First-line: Combination of high-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) + Rituximab (RTX) OR Cyclophosphamide (CYC)
  • RTX is preferred in relapsing disease
  • RTX is also preferred in patients wishing to preserve fertility (male or female), and in those with previous high CYC exposure
  • RTX dosing (RAVE protocol): 375 mg/m² per week × 4 weeks OR 1 g at weeks 0 and 2 (both comparable efficacy)
  • RTX biosimilars have similar efficacy to the originator

B. Non-organ-threatening / Non-life-threatening GPA (Recommendation 4)

  • First-line: Combination of GCs + RTX
  • Alternatives to RTX:
    • Methotrexate (MTX) - can be continued if used to induce remission
    • Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) - especially if RTX is contraindicated/not tolerated
    • CYC is not first-line here; may be considered only when RTX, MTX, and MMF cannot be used

GLUCOCORTICOID DOSING (Recommendation 5)

Weeks<50 kg50-75 kg>75 kg
1*50 mg60 mg75 mg
225 mg30 mg40 mg
3-420 mg25 mg30 mg
5-615 mg20 mg25 mg
7-812.5 mg15 mg20 mg
9-1010 mg12.5 mg15 mg
11-127.5 mg10 mg12.5 mg
13-146 mg7.5 mg10 mg
15-185 mg5 mg7.5 mg
19-525 mg5 mg5 mg
(All doses are prednisolone equivalent/day) *Consider IV methylprednisolone 1-3 g on days 1-3 for severely active disease (eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m² and/or diffuse alveolar haemorrhage)
  • Target: 5 mg/day by 4-5 months
  • IV methylprednisolone pulses should be limited to severe organ-threatening disease (active renal involvement with eGFR <50, or DAH); no routine use

AVACOPAN (Recommendation 6) - NEW 2022

  • Avacopan 30 mg twice daily (oral C5a receptor inhibitor) + RTX or CYC may be considered as part of a strategy to substantially reduce GC exposure
  • Especially indicated in:
    • Patients at risk of GC-related adverse effects
    • Active glomerulonephritis with rapidly declining kidney function (better renal recovery shown vs GC in the ADVOCATE trial)
  • Remission at week 26: avacopan 72.3% vs GC 70.1% (comparable)
  • Sustained remission at week 52: avacopan 65.7% vs GC 54.9% (superior)
  • Stop avacopan after 6-12 months - no data beyond 1 year; longer-term use not recommended

PLASMA EXCHANGE (Recommendation 7)

  • May be considered in patients with serum creatinine >300 µmol/L due to active glomerulonephritis (reduced from >500 µmol/L threshold in 2016 guidelines)
  • Not routinely recommended for alveolar haemorrhage in GPA
  • PLEX reduces ESKD risk at 12 months but increases serious infections - use requires individual risk-benefit discussion
  • PLEX is recommended for patients with anti-GBM antibody overlap

REFRACTORY GPA (Recommendation 8)

  • Thorough reassessment of disease status and comorbidities
  • Consider switching from CYC to RTX or vice versa
  • RTX + CYC combination considered by many centres
  • IV immunoglobulins (IVIG) can be an option for persistent disease with increased infection risk
  • These patients should be managed at vasculitis expert centres

REMISSION MAINTENANCE

GPA/MPA Maintenance (Recommendation 9)

  • First-line: Rituximab - recommended after induction with either RTX or CYC
  • RTX regimen: 500 mg every 6 months (preferred fixed schedule); higher dose (1 g) or shorter interval (every 4 months) may be considered for patients who relapse on 500 mg q6 months
  • Alternatives to RTX:
    • Azathioprine (AZA)
    • Methotrexate (MTX)
    • MMF (if intolerance/contraindications to RTX, AZA, MTX)
    • Leflunomide (in GPA with intolerance to all above drugs)
  • T/S (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) does not reduce relapse risk; not recommended for relapse prevention
  • Belimumab + AZA: no benefit shown in RCT

Duration of Maintenance (Recommendation 10)

  • 24-48 months for new-onset disease
  • Longer duration should be considered in:
    • Relapsing patients
    • Those with increased relapse risk (GPA > MPA; PR3-ANCA positive; ANCA positivity persisting in remission; B cell repopulation <12 months after RTX; respiratory tract involvement)
  • Balance against patient preferences and immunosuppression risks

MONITORING DURING TREATMENT

Recommendation 15

  • Structured clinical assessment (using BVAS scoring) should drive treatment decisions - not ANCA or CD19+ B cell testing alone
  • ANCA/B cell counts have insufficient predictive value to guide individual patient decisions

Recommendation 16

  • Measure serum immunoglobulin levels before each course of RTX to detect secondary immunodeficiency (hypogammaglobulinaemia develops in 21% after 36 months of RTX)

INFECTION PROPHYLAXIS (Recommendation 17)

  • Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (T/S) 800/160 mg on alternate days or 400/80 mg daily is recommended for all GPA patients receiving:
    • CYC
    • RTX
    • GCs ≥30 mg/day for ≥4 weeks
  • Purpose: Prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) and other infections
  • Continue T/S for ~3 months after last CYC dose; ~6 months after last RTX dose or until B cell reconstitution
  • Alternatives if T/S not tolerated: dapsone, atovaquone, aerosolised pentamidine

OVERARCHING PRINCIPLES

  • Shared decision-making between patient and physician (considering efficacy, safety, costs)
  • Patient education on disease, warning symptoms, treatment side effects
  • Periodic screening for treatment-related adverse effects and comorbidities (cardiovascular risk, osteoporosis, CKD, bladder cancer if on CYC)
  • Multidisciplinary management at centres with vasculitis expertise; access to clinical trials important for relapsing/refractory disease

Source: Hellmich B, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2024;83:30-47.

In induction phase which to choose rtx or cyc

Based on the PDF you shared (EULAR 2022), here is a direct answer:

RTX vs CYC for Induction in GPA - Decision Guide


Both are equally effective for new-onset GPA

RTX was non-inferior to CYC in two high-quality RCTs (RAVE and RITUXVAS trials) for new-onset GPA/MPA.

Choose RITUXIMAB when:

SituationReason
Relapsing diseaseRTX is preferred (higher remission rates at 6 & 12 months vs CYC in relapsing patients - RAVE trial)
Childbearing potential (male or female)CYC reduces ovarian reserve, causes premature ovarian failure, male infertility
Previous high CYC exposureCumulative CYC increases malignancy risk
Concern about long-term toxicityCYC linked to bladder cancer, bone marrow failure, myelodysplastic syndrome, other malignancies
RTX already used for inductionRepeated CYC courses increase cancer risk further

Choose CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE when:

SituationReason
Severe renal failure (some centres prefer it)RTX pharmacokinetics in severe renal failure are less studied; some task force members prefer CYC in this setting
Diffuse alveolar haemorrhage (DAH) with severe renal diseaseSame reasoning as above (individual preference)
RTX contraindicated or unavailablee.g., prior severe allergic reaction to RTX
Non-organ-threatening disease where RTX/MTX/MMF cannot be usedCYC is last-resort alternative in this setting
Note: RTX and CYC have comparable outcomes in severe disease including renal involvement and DAH (PEXIVAS trial included both agents) - the preference for CYC in severe renal/DAH is not evidence-based but practice-based per the task force.

The Trend: RTX is Increasingly Preferred

The PDF explicitly states:
"There has been an increasing preference for RTX over CYC, mostly because of concerns about long-term safety of CYC."
"The use of RTX is lowering CYC exposure and reducing the risk of malignancy in patients with AAV."

Summary Algorithm (from the PDF)

New-onset GPA with organ/life-threatening disease
        ↓
   RTX or CYC (both acceptable)
        ↓
   Prefer RTX if: relapsing disease, 
   childbearing potential, prior CYC exposure,
   safety concerns

Relapsing GPA → RTX preferred
Non-organ-threatening GPA → RTX recommended
   (MTX or MMF as alternatives, NOT CYC first-line)

Bottom line from the PDF: For new-onset GPA, either agent is acceptable. RTX is the preferred choice in relapsing disease and whenever long-term toxicity is a concern. CYC should be reserved for situations where RTX cannot be used, except in selected severe renal/DAH cases where some clinicians still prefer it.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.