Based on the PDF you shared (EULAR 2022), here is a direct answer:
RTX vs CYC for Induction in GPA - Decision Guide
Both are equally effective for new-onset GPA
RTX was non-inferior to CYC in two high-quality RCTs (RAVE and RITUXVAS trials) for new-onset GPA/MPA.
Choose RITUXIMAB when:
| Situation | Reason |
|---|
| Relapsing disease | RTX is preferred (higher remission rates at 6 & 12 months vs CYC in relapsing patients - RAVE trial) |
| Childbearing potential (male or female) | CYC reduces ovarian reserve, causes premature ovarian failure, male infertility |
| Previous high CYC exposure | Cumulative CYC increases malignancy risk |
| Concern about long-term toxicity | CYC linked to bladder cancer, bone marrow failure, myelodysplastic syndrome, other malignancies |
| RTX already used for induction | Repeated CYC courses increase cancer risk further |
Choose CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE when:
| Situation | Reason |
|---|
| Severe renal failure (some centres prefer it) | RTX pharmacokinetics in severe renal failure are less studied; some task force members prefer CYC in this setting |
| Diffuse alveolar haemorrhage (DAH) with severe renal disease | Same reasoning as above (individual preference) |
| RTX contraindicated or unavailable | e.g., prior severe allergic reaction to RTX |
| Non-organ-threatening disease where RTX/MTX/MMF cannot be used | CYC is last-resort alternative in this setting |
Note: RTX and CYC have comparable outcomes in severe disease including renal involvement and DAH (PEXIVAS trial included both agents) - the preference for CYC in severe renal/DAH is not evidence-based but practice-based per the task force.
The Trend: RTX is Increasingly Preferred
The PDF explicitly states:
"There has been an increasing preference for RTX over CYC, mostly because of concerns about long-term safety of CYC."
"The use of RTX is lowering CYC exposure and reducing the risk of malignancy in patients with AAV."
Summary Algorithm (from the PDF)
New-onset GPA with organ/life-threatening disease
↓
RTX or CYC (both acceptable)
↓
Prefer RTX if: relapsing disease,
childbearing potential, prior CYC exposure,
safety concerns
Relapsing GPA → RTX preferred
Non-organ-threatening GPA → RTX recommended
(MTX or MMF as alternatives, NOT CYC first-line)
Bottom line from the PDF: For new-onset GPA, either agent is acceptable. RTX is the preferred choice in relapsing disease and whenever long-term toxicity is a concern. CYC should be reserved for situations where RTX cannot be used, except in selected severe renal/DAH cases where some clinicians still prefer it.