How do i separate this outline to 8 people, first of all is this outline okay for undergraduates or should I be for Bailey and love oriented *Seminar 2: Upper Gastro intestinal Bleed* 1. Anatomy of Upper gastro-intestinal tract 2. Causes of upper GI Bleed 3. Emergency Management of acute GI bleeding episode 4. Brief discussion of management of hemorrhage due to Ulcers (Oesophageal Gastric Duodenal)/ Erosions (Oesophageal Gastric Duodenal) / Mallory–Weiss tear / Oesophageal varices / Tumour (Oesophageal Gastric)/ Vascular lesions /any other lesions eg. Hemobilia etc. by remaining speakers

Asking for Preferences
Here's my honest assessment and the split:

Is the outline appropriate for undergraduates?

Yes — the outline is well-suited for early clinical undergraduates (Year 3–4), and you do NOT need Bailey & Love depth. Bailey & Love is a surgical reference text aimed at trainees and surgeons. For a 40-minute undergraduate seminar, you want:
  • Conceptual understanding, not operative technique
  • Recognise → stabilise → investigate → refer thinking
  • Clinical principles over procedural detail
The one adjustment I'd suggest: point 4 is currently one massive topic assigned to "remaining speakers." It needs to be broken into individual speaker slots — which is exactly what the split below does.

Division Among 8 Speakers (~5 min each)

#SpeakerTopicKey Points to Cover
1Speaker 1Anatomy of the Upper GI TractOesophagus, stomach, duodenum up to ligament of Treitz; blood supply (left gastric, splenic, hepatic arteries); venous drainage & portosystemic connections
2Speaker 2Causes & Classification of Upper GI BleedVariceal vs. non-variceal; common causes by frequency (PUD most common); Rockall / Blatchford score mention as risk tools
3Speaker 3Emergency Management — ResuscitationABCDE approach; 2 large-bore IV lines, fluid resuscitation, blood transfusion targets; nil by mouth, catheter, monitoring
4Speaker 4Emergency Management — Investigation & EscalationBloods (FBC, U&E, coagulation, G&S), NG tube debate, urgent OGD timing, surgical/ITU escalation
5Speaker 5Peptic Ulcer Disease Bleeding (Gastric & Duodenal)Causes (H. pylori, NSAIDs), Forrest classification, endoscopic haemostasis (injection, clips, APC), PPI infusion
6Speaker 6Oesophageal Varices & Portal HypertensionPathophysiology of portal HTN, Sengstaken-Blakemore tube, terlipressin, banding vs. sclerotherapy, TIPSS mention
7Speaker 7Mallory–Weiss Tear & Oesophageal/Gastric ErosionsMechanism (vomiting → longitudinal mucosal tear), usually self-limiting, when intervention needed; erosions vs. ulcers distinction
8Speaker 8Tumours, Vascular Lesions & Rare CausesOesophageal/gastric malignancy as bleeding source; angiodysplasia, Dieulafoy lesion, haemobilia; brief overview only

Practical Tips

  • Speakers 1–2 set the foundation — everyone else builds on them, so they should present first.
  • Speakers 3–4 work as a pair covering emergency management and flow naturally together.
  • Speakers 5–8 each own a specific cause — they should use a consistent mini-template: What is it → Why it bleeds → How you manage it.
  • For a 5-minute slot, 2–4 slides maximum per speaker is the right target.
  • Avoid operative surgical detail (e.g., oversewing vessels, Whipple) — that's Bailey & Love territory and beyond scope.

Any repetition in this flow or anyone getting too much of work

Good question. Here's an honest audit:

Repetition Risks

OverlapBetweenFix
"Emergency management" could bleed into cause-specific managementSpeakers 3–4 vs. Speakers 5–8Speakers 3–4 stick to generic resuscitation only — no cause-specific treatment. Speakers 5–8 own their specific management.
Erosions vs. ulcers distinctionSpeaker 5 (PUD) and Speaker 7 (erosions)Speaker 5 defines ulcers, Speaker 7 defines erosions — but they must not both explain the difference. Assign that definition clearly to Speaker 7 only.
Portal hypertension pathophysiologyCould creep into Speaker 2 (causes) and Speaker 6 (varices)Speaker 2 names varices as a cause only. Speaker 6 explains the pathophysiology. Draw that line explicitly.

Workload Imbalance

SpeakerLoad Assessment
Speaker 8Overloaded — tumours (2 sites), vascular lesions (angiodysplasia, Dieulafoy), AND rare causes (haemobilia, etc.) is too much for 5 minutes
Speaker 7Underloaded — Mallory–Weiss + erosions is relatively light content
Speakers 3 & 4Roughly equal but could overlap on "when to scope" — clarify that Speaker 4 owns OGD timing

Suggested Fixes

1. Redistribute Speaker 8's load onto Speaker 7:
Speaker 7 (revised): Mallory–Weiss tear + Erosions + Vascular lesions (angiodysplasia, Dieulafoy) Speaker 8 (revised): Tumours (oesophageal + gastric) + Rare causes (haemobilia, aortoenteric fistula) — this is now more balanced since tumours alone carry enough clinical content for 5 minutes
2. Give each cause-specific speaker (5–8) a shared template:
  • What is it / how common?
  • Why/how it bleeds
  • One or two key management points
This prevents some speakers going deep on pathophysiology while others rush through management.

Revised Clean Split

#SpeakerTopic
1Speaker 1Anatomy of upper GI tract
2Speaker 2Causes & classification (overview only, no management)
3Speaker 3Emergency resuscitation (ABCDE, IV access, transfusion)
4Speaker 4Investigations, OGD timing & escalation
5Speaker 5Peptic ulcer bleeding (gastric + duodenal)
6Speaker 6Oesophageal varices
7Speaker 7Mallory–Weiss + Erosions + Vascular lesions
8Speaker 8Tumours (oesophageal/gastric) + Rare causes
This gives a cleaner, more balanced flow with no significant repetition if each speaker respects their lane.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.