Provide rescent stroke guideline

Checking Date & Time
Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"ischemic stroke" AND "guidelines"

Reading File
Reading File
Searching PubMed

"acute ischemic stroke" AND "mechanical thrombectomy"

Reading Article
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"hemorrhagic stroke" AND "management"

Searching PubMed

"stroke" AND "secondary prevention" AND "AHA"

Reading File
Reading File
Reading Article
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
I now have comprehensive information to provide a thorough stroke guideline summary. Let me compile this.

Recent Stroke Management Guidelines (2024–2025 Update)

Based on AHA/ASA Guidelines, textbook evidence (Rosen's EM, Bradley & Daroff's Neurology, Fuster's The Heart), and the most recent published guidelines as of April 2026.

1. ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE (AIS)

Initial Assessment & General Measures

  • Airway/Breathing/Circulation: Secure airway in obtunded patients; supplemental O₂ only if SpO₂ <94%
  • Blood pressure: Do not lower BP unless >185/110 mmHg (thrombolysis candidate) or >220/120 mmHg (non-thrombolysis); use labetalol or nicardipine IV
  • Blood glucose: Treat hyperglycemia to 140–180 mg/dL; treat hypoglycemia (<60 mg/dL) with IV dextrose
  • Fever: Treat sources of hyperthermia (>38°C); antipyretics recommended
  • NIHSS: Rapid neurological assessment with NIHSS score

IV Thrombolytic Therapy

Alteplase (primary FDA-approved agent)

Time WindowRecommendation
0–3 hoursIV alteplase 0.9 mg/kg (max 90 mg) over 60 min; initial 10% as bolus over 1 min. Recommended for all eligible patients ≥18 years regardless of age (≤80 or >80)
3–4.5 hoursRecommended for patients ≤80 years, no history of both DM + prior stroke, NIHSS ≤25, not on oral anticoagulants, <1/3 MCA territory involvement
Mild disabling strokeIV alteplase recommended even for mild but disabling deficits within 3 h
Severe strokeRecommended despite increased hemorrhagic transformation risk — net benefit proven
BP prerequisite: <185/110 mmHg before initiation (lower safely with antihypertensives first)

Tenecteplase (increasingly preferred)

  • 0.25 mg/kg IV single bolus (max 25 mg) — easier to administer than alteplase infusion
  • Comparable efficacy and safety to alteplase at 90 days (NIHSS, sICH, mortality)
  • Preferred over alteplase when the patient is eligible for mechanical thrombectomy (EXTEND-IA TNK: superior reperfusion rates)
  • A 2024 meta-analysis (PMID: 39413337, Neurology) confirms non-inferiority of tenecteplase vs. alteplase within 4.5 h across RCTs

Mechanical Thrombectomy (EVT)

FeatureRecommendation
IndicationLarge vessel occlusion (LVO) of anterior circulation, proven on CTA/MRA
Time window (early)0–6 hours from last known well — regardless of IV alteplase eligibility
Time window (late)6–24 hours with imaging-guided patient selection (DAWN / DEFUSE-3 criteria): small core infarct + large penumbra via perfusion imaging
IV alteplase first?Give IV alteplase before thrombectomy if eligible — do not delay thrombectomy for alteplase infusion
Device choiceStent retrievers or large-bore aspiration catheters (equivalent outcomes); balloon guide catheters improve first-pass reperfusion
Posterior circulationBasilar artery occlusion — EVT beneficial; evidence from ATTENTION and BAOCHE trials
Time is brain: Every 1-hour delay to reperfusion worsens disability outcomes. Target door-to-puncture ≤90 min.

Contraindications to Thrombolytics (selected)

  • Active intracranial hemorrhage on CT
  • Recent intracranial/spinal surgery (<3 months)
  • Platelet count <100,000; INR >1.7 (on anticoagulants)
  • Serum glucose <50 mg/dL
  • Cerebral microbleeds >10 on MRI — benefit uncertain

2. INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE (ICH)

Blood Pressure Management

  • Target SBP 130–150 mmHg acutely (INTERACT2, ATACH-2 evidence)
  • Rapid lowering to <140 mmHg is safe and may modestly improve outcomes if started within 6 hours

Anticoagulant Reversal

Reverse immediately based on agent:
AgentReversal
WarfarinProthrombin complex concentrate (PCC) + Vitamin K; avoid rFVIIa
Alteplase-related sICHCryoprecipitate 10 U IV (target fibrinogen ≥150 mg/dL)
Direct thrombin inhibitorsIdarucizumab (dabigatran)
Factor Xa inhibitorsAndexanet alfa

ICP Management

  • GCS ≤8 or clinical herniation → ICP monitoring; target CPP 50–70 mmHg
  • External ventricular drain for hydrocephalus/intraventricular hemorrhage
  • Mannitol or HTS (3% or 23.4%) for elevated ICP — meta-analysis shows HTS slightly superior
  • No corticosteroids for ICP in ICH

Surgical Intervention

  • Cerebellar ICH with deterioration, brainstem compression, or hydrocephalus → urgent surgical evacuation (neurosurgical emergency)
  • Supratentorial ICH: Open craniotomy not routinely beneficial; consider for neurological deterioration, coma, midline shift, or refractory ICP
  • Minimally invasive surgery (catheter/MISTIE approach) shows mortality benefit in meta-analyses; ENRICH trial ongoing

3. PRIMARY PREVENTION OF STROKE

2024 AHA/ASA Guideline (PMID: 39429201, Stroke 2024) — replaces 2014 guideline
Key updates:
  • Aligns with Life's Essential 8 framework (BP, lipids, glucose, weight, smoking, sleep, physical activity, diet)
  • New: sex-specific recommendations — screening for gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, hormone therapy risks, atrial fibrillation in women
  • Hypertension control remains #1 modifiable risk factor
  • Statin therapy for patients with atherosclerotic CVD risk ≥10% (10-year)
  • Anticoagulation for AF — CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≥2 (men), ≥3 (women)

4. SECONDARY PREVENTION

Antiplatelet Therapy

  • Aspirin 75–325 mg/day for non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke/TIA
  • Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT): Aspirin + clopidogrel for 21 days after minor stroke/high-risk TIA (POINT and CHANCE trials) — then transition to monotherapy
  • Aspirin + ticagrelor (THALES trial) — alternative in first 30 days for non-cardioembolic minor stroke

Anticoagulation

  • Atrial fibrillation: Prefer DOAC over warfarin (dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban)
  • Initiation timing post-stroke: "1-3-6-12 rule" based on infarct size (minor: 1 day, moderate: 3 days, large: 6 days, hemorrhagic transformation: 12 days)
  • Cervical artery dissection (PMID: 38739383, JAMA Neurol 2024): Antiplatelet and anticoagulation equivalent in safety/efficacy — individualize

PFO Closure

2024 ESO Guidelines (PMID: 38752755):
  • PFO closure recommended for cryptogenic stroke patients ≤60 years after excluding other etiologies
  • Antithrombotic therapy (antiplatelet or anticoagulant) recommended if closure is deferred

Risk Factor Control

Risk FactorTarget
Blood pressure<130/80 mmHg
LDL-C<70 mg/dL (high-risk); consider <55 mg/dL for very high-risk
HbA1c<7% for most diabetic patients
Smoking cessationImmediate — doubles stroke risk

5. STROKE SYSTEMS OF CARE

  • Stroke unit care reduces mortality and dependency — strongest Level A evidence
  • Telestroke networks extend access to expert evaluation in non-comprehensive centers
  • Door-to-CT: ≤25 min | Door-to-needle (alteplase): ≤60 min | Door-to-groin puncture: ≤90 min

Key Recent Guidelines Referenced

GuidelineSourceYearPMID
Primary Prevention of StrokeAHA/ASA (Stroke)202439429201
PFO After StrokeEuropean Stroke Organisation202438752755
Ischaemic Cerebrovascular DiseaseChinese Stroke Association2023 update38158224
Reperfusion Therapy (AIS)Chinese Stroke Association202439832918
Tenecteplase vs. Alteplase Meta-AnalysisNeurology202439413337
Cervical Artery Dissection Antithrombotic RxJAMA Neurol202438739383
Global Stroke Guidelines SynthesisWorld Stroke Organization (Int J Stroke)202336725717
Textbook sources: Rosen's Emergency Medicine 9th Ed. (Table 87.5), Bradley & Daroff's Neurology in Clinical Practice, Fuster & Hurst's The Heart 15th Ed.

Note: The AHA/ASA 2024 Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment Guideline update (anticipated) had not been fully published as of the textbook editions available. The 2019 AHA/ASA criteria remain the current backbone for thrombolysis eligibility; tenecteplase has been increasingly incorporated as an equivalent alternative. Always verify local institutional protocols and the most current AHA/ASA full-text guidelines at AHA Professional Heart Daily.

Posterior circulation stroke management guideline

Checking Date & Time
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"posterior circulation stroke" AND "management"

Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"basilar artery occlusion" AND "thrombectomy"

Reading Article
Reading Article
Reading Article
Reading File
Reading File
Reading Article
Reading Article
Reading Article
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Searching PubMed

"posterior circulation" AND "ischemic stroke" AND "thrombolysis"

Reading Article
Reading Article
Finding Sources
I now have comprehensive, current evidence to compile a thorough guideline. Let me synthesize everything.

Posterior Circulation Stroke: Management Guidelines

Synthesized from ESO/ESMINT 2024 Guideline, landmark RCTs (ATTENTION, BAOCHE, BASICS, BEST), VERITAS meta-analysis 2025, TRACE-5 2026, and medical textbooks.

Anatomy & Clinical Framework

The posterior circulation comprises:
  • Proximal: Vertebral arteries → basilar artery (proximal/middle/distal segments)
  • Perforators: Anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA), posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA), superior cerebellar artery (SCA)
  • Distal: Posterior cerebral arteries (PCA)
Posterior circulation strokes account for ~20–25% of all ischemic strokes but ≤1–2% involve basilar artery occlusion (BAO) — the most catastrophic subtype with untreated mortality >80%.

1. RECOGNITION & DIAGNOSIS

Key Clinical Features by Territory

TerritoryClassic Presentation
Basilar arteryBilateral limb weakness, dysarthria, diplopia, oculomotor palsies, decreased consciousness; locked-in syndrome (bilateral ventral pontine lesion — paralysis except vertical gaze/blink)
Lateral medullary (Wallenberg/PICA)Ipsilateral facial numbness + Horner's, contralateral body pain/temp loss, vertigo, dysphagia, ataxia
Cerebellar (PICA/AICA/SCA)Vertigo, vomiting, gait ataxia, nystagmus, dysmetria; may mimic labyrinthitis
AICAVertigo, facial weakness, ipsilateral hearing loss, ataxia, Horner's
PCAContralateral homonymous hemianopia, amnesia, alexia without agraphia
Vertebrobasilar (proximal)Dizziness, nausea, headache, dysphagia, hemiataxia, Horner's
⚠️ Up to 25% of posterior fossa infarcts have a normal non-contrast CT — if posterior circulation stroke is suspected with normal CT, obtain urgent diffusion-weighted MRI. CTA/MRA is essential to identify vascular occlusion. — Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine

NIHSS Caveat

The standard NIHSS underscores posterior circulation deficits (vertigo, ataxia, cranial nerve signs). Use the pc-NIHSS or dedicated posterior circulation scoring where available. Patients can have severe BAO with deceptively low NIHSS scores.

2. ACUTE PHASE: GENERAL MANAGEMENT

Principles apply equally to anterior and posterior circulation:
  • Airway: Secure early — brainstem strokes impair airway reflexes faster than hemispheric strokes
  • BP: Permissive hypertension (do not lower unless >185/110 if thrombolysis candidate, or >220/120 otherwise); allow collateral flow
  • Glucose: Maintain 140–180 mg/dL; treat hypoglycemia (<60 mg/dL) with IV dextrose
  • Fever: Treat aggressively (>38°C)
  • Stroke unit admission: Reduces mortality and dependency (Level A evidence)

3. INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYSIS (IVT)

Alteplase

  • Standard dosing: 0.9 mg/kg IV (max 90 mg) over 60 min — applies to posterior circulation strokes within 4.5 hours
  • No separate posterior circulation contraindications beyond standard criteria
  • Meta-analysis (Knapen et al., J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2024 — PMID 38395096):
    • Pooled favorable outcome (mRS 0–2): 63% with IVT
    • Mortality 19%; sICH 4%
    • Standard window (<4.5 h): 77% favorable outcome vs 38% in extended window (>4.5 h)
    • IVT is safe and effective in both standard and extended time windows in posterior circulation strokes

Tenecteplase — Extended Window for BAO (NEW 2026)

TRACE-5 Trial (Lancet, Feb 2026 — PMID 41655588):
  • Tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg IV bolus (max 25 mg) within 24 hours of BAO onset
  • Primary outcome (mRS 0–1 or return to baseline): 38% tenecteplase vs 29% standard treatment (aRR 1.50; 95% CI 1.09–2.08; p=0.014)
  • sICH: 2% vs 3% (non-significantly lower with tenecteplase)
  • Mortality at 90 days: similar between groups (~29–31%)
  • Conclusion: Tenecteplase within 24 h after BAO onset significantly improves functional outcomes compared to standard medical treatment
🔑 Key ESO/ESMINT 2024 expert consensus: IVT (including beyond 4.5 h) is suggested for BAO patients up to 24 hours unless contraindicated, given the very poor natural history of untreated BAO.

4. ENDOVASCULAR THROMBECTOMY (EVT) FOR BASILAR ARTERY OCCLUSION

Landmark Evidence

TrialDesignTime WindowPrimary Outcome (mRS 0–3 at 90d)Thrombectomy vs Control
ATTENTION (NEJM 2022, PMID 36239644)RCT, 340 pts, China0–12 h46% vs 23%aRR 2.06 (p<0.001); mortality 37% vs 55%
BAOCHE (NEJM 2022, PMID 36239645)RCT, 217 pts, China6–24 h46% vs 24%aRR 1.81 (p<0.001); trial stopped early for superiority
BASICSRCT, Europe/Brazil0–6 hNon-significant overall benefitBenefit in moderate-severe NIHSS ≥10
BESTRCT, China0–8 hNon-significant overallHigh crossover rate

VERITAS Meta-Analysis (Lancet, Jan 2025 — PMID 39674187)

Individual patient data from ATTENTION, BAOCHE, BASICS, BEST (n=988):
  • mRS 0–3: 45% EVT vs 30% control (aOR 2.41; 95% CI 1.78–3.26; p<0.0001)
  • Functional independence (mRS 0–2): 35% vs 21% (aOR 2.52; p<0.0001)
  • Mortality: 36% vs 45% (aOR 0.60; p<0.0001)
  • sICH: 5% vs <1% (significantly higher with EVT)
  • Key subgroup findings:
    • NIHSS ≥10: Clear benefit from EVT
    • NIHSS <10 (mild strokes): Uncertain benefit — BMT non-significantly better and safer than EVT
    • Proximal/middle BAO: Greater benefit than distal BAO

1-Year Outcomes (ATTENTION Extension, JAMA Neurol 2024 — PMID 39186280)

  • mRS 0–3 at 1 year: 44.6% thrombectomy vs 19.4% control (aRR 2.23)
  • Excellent outcome (mRS 0–1) at 1 year magnified vs 90-day benefit (27.9% vs 8.3%)
  • Mortality continues to increase in both groups at 1 year; thrombectomy advantage sustained

5. ESO/ESMINT 2024 GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BAO

(PMID 38752743 — Strbian D et al., Eur Stroke J 2024)
Clinical SituationRecommendation
IVT vs no IVTExpert Consensus: Suggest IVT up to 24 hours unless contraindicated
IVT + EVT vs direct EVTSuggest IVT + EVT over direct EVT (bridging preferred)
EVT within 0–6 h (NIHSS ≥10)Suggest EVT + BMT over BMT alone (very low certainty of evidence)
EVT within 6–24 h (NIHSS ≥10)Suggest EVT + BMT over BMT alone (BAOCHE data)
NIHSS <10 (mild stroke)No evidence to recommend EVT — BMT non-significantly better + safer
Extensive bilateral/brainstem ischaemic changesExpert Consensus: against reperfusion therapy
Collateral scoresReperfusion therapy regardless of collateral score (insufficient evidence to restrict)
Thrombectomy deviceSuggest direct aspiration over stent retriever as first-line (limited evidence)
Failed EVTExpert Consensus: rescue PTA/stenting considered
Antithrombotic during/after EVTSuggest add-on antithrombotic if: no concurrent IVT AND EVT complicated (failed, imminent re-occlusion, or stenting required)

6. CEREBELLAR INFARCTION — SPECIAL MANAGEMENT

Cerebellar infarcts carry a unique risk of space-occupying edema and herniation — the most feared complication.

Monitoring Protocol

  • Serial neurological exams every 1–2 hours in acute phase — watch for:
    • Decreasing consciousness / deteriorating GCS
    • New gaze palsy (VI nerve palsy or conjugate gaze paresis) — sentinel sign of brainstem compression
    • Hemiparesis ipsilateral to ataxia
    • Worsening headache + vomiting
  • Early neurosurgical consultation for all cerebellar infarcts

Imaging

  • Repeat CT/MRI at any sign of deterioration to assess edema, brainstem compression, hydrocephalus
  • Even small cerebellar edema can compress the 4th ventricle → obstructive hydrocephalus

Treatment of Cerebellar Edema & Herniation

InterventionIndication
Hypertonic saline (3% or 23.4%) or mannitolSymptomatic ICP elevation as bridge to surgery; HTS slightly superior in meta-analysis
External ventricular drain (EVD)Acute obstructive hydrocephalus
Suboccipital craniectomy (posterior fossa decompression)Onset of brainstem compression or hydrocephalus — should be performed promptly, not delayed; "ventricular drainage alone is usually inadequate" — Adams & Victor's Neurology
⚠️ Ventricular drainage alone is inadequate for cerebellar herniation — surgical decompression of swollen tissue is required as soon as edema becomes clinically apparent. A brief observation period is acceptable only if 4th ventricle and perimesencephalic cisterns remain open and patient is awake. — Adams & Victor's Principles of Neurology, 12th Ed.

7. SECONDARY PREVENTION IN POSTERIOR CIRCULATION STROKE

Cause-Directed Therapy

EtiologyManagement
Cardioembolic (AF)DOAC (apixaban preferred); initiate within 1–14 days based on infarct size
Large artery atherosclerosis (vertebral/basilar)DAPT (aspirin + clopidogrel) for 21–90 days → single antiplatelet; high-intensity statin (LDL <70 mg/dL); aggressive BP control
Intracranial atherosclerosisDAPT for ≥3 months; consider intracranial angioplasty/stenting only if refractory
Small vessel disease (lacunar)Single antiplatelet; strict BP control (target <130/80 mmHg)
Vertebral artery dissectionAntiplatelet or anticoagulation — equivalent efficacy (CADISS trial); anticoagulation for 3–6 months then reassess
Subclavian stealSurgical/endovascular revascularization if symptomatic

Risk Factor Targets

FactorTarget
Blood pressure (long-term)Systolic <130 mmHg
LDL cholesterol<70 mg/dL (atherosclerotic etiology); <55 mg/dL (very high risk)
HbA1c<7%
Physical activity150 min moderate/week
SmokingCessation

8. REVASCULARIZATION STRATEGY COMPARISON

Network meta-analysis (Shu et al., BMC Neurol, 2025 — PMID 41257736, 18,215 patients):
StrategymRS 0–2 Ranking (SUCRA)sICH RiskMortality
EVT + IVTBest (0.83)HighestIntermediate
EVT aloneIntermediate (0.36)IntermediateHighest
IVT aloneLowest (0.30)LowestLowest
Combined EVT + IVT has the highest probability of best functional outcome for posterior circulation LVO. However, IVT alone is safest (lowest sICH, lowest mortality). Individualize based on patient profile.

Key Guidelines Summary Table

Guideline / StudySourceYearPMID
ESO/ESMINT BAO Acute ManagementEur Stroke J202438752743
VERITAS Individual Patient Meta-AnalysisLancet202539674187
TRACE-5: Tenecteplase in BAO (24h window)Lancet202641655588
ATTENTION Trial (EVT 0–12h BAO)NEJM202236239644
BAOCHE Trial (EVT 6–24h BAO)NEJM202236239645
ATTENTION 1-year follow-upJAMA Neurol202439186280
IVT for Posterior Circulation StrokeJ Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis202438395096
Revascularization Network Meta-analysisBMC Neurol202541257736
Textbook sources: Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine, Adams & Victor's Principles of Neurology 12th Ed., Bradley & Daroff's Neurology in Clinical Practice, Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine 22nd Ed. (2025)

Practice Pearls

  1. Do not withhold thrombolysis in posterior circulation stroke — the natural history of untreated BAO carries >80% mortality/severe disability
  2. Tenecteplase up to 24 hours is now supported by Phase 3 evidence (TRACE-5) for BAO
  3. EVT benefits moderate-severe BAO (NIHSS ≥10) in both 0–12 h and 6–24 h windows; evidence for mild stroke (NIHSS <10) is uncertain
  4. Cerebellar infarcts require urgent neurosurgical consultation — edema can cause fatal herniation within hours; do not delay decompression
  5. MRI DWI is mandatory if CT is negative and posterior stroke is clinically suspected
  6. NIHSS underestimates posterior circulation deficits — use clinical judgment alongside scoring

Posterior circulation stroke management guideline

The answer to this question is already in our conversation above. Here is a concise summary of the key points from the detailed response provided:

Posterior Circulation Stroke Management — Key Points

Recognition

  • Up to 25% of posterior fossa infarcts have a normal CT → order DWI-MRI if clinically suspected
  • NIHSS underscores posterior circulation deficits — use clinical judgment
  • Watch for: bilateral weakness, diplopia, dysarthria, vertigo, ataxia, crossed cranial nerve signs, decreased consciousness

IV Thrombolysis

ScenarioRecommendation
<4.5 h (standard)Alteplase 0.9 mg/kg or tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg — same criteria as anterior circulation
4.5–24 h (BAO)ESO/ESMINT 2024 Expert Consensus: Suggest IVT up to 24 h unless contraindicated
Tenecteplase in BAO within 24 hTRACE-5 trial (Lancet 2026): mRS 0–1 rate 38% vs 29% (aRR 1.50, p=0.014) — superior to standard treatment

Endovascular Thrombectomy (EVT) for Basilar Artery Occlusion

Time WindowEvidenceRecommendation
0–12 hATTENTION trial: 46% vs 23% mRS 0–3 (p<0.001)Recommend EVT + best medical treatment (NIHSS ≥10)
6–24 hBAOCHE trial: 46% vs 24% mRS 0–3 (p<0.001)Recommend EVT + best medical treatment (NIHSS ≥10)
NIHSS <10VERITAS meta-analysis (Lancet 2025, n=988): no benefitNo EVT recommendation — BMT safer
Extensive bilateral/brainstem ischemiaESO/ESMINT 2024Against reperfusion therapy
Preferred EVT strategy: Direct aspiration over stent retriever as first-line (ESO/ESMINT 2024)
Bridging: IVT + EVT preferred over direct EVT when eligible

Cerebellar Infarction — Critical Steps

  1. Early neurosurgical consultation for all cerebellar infarcts
  2. Monitor every 1–2 h for: new gaze palsy, decreasing consciousness, worsening headache
  3. Obstructive hydrocephalus → external ventricular drain
  4. Cerebellar edema + brainstem compressionurgent suboccipital craniectomy (do not delay; EVD alone is insufficient)
  5. Bridge with mannitol or hypertonic saline while preparing for surgery

Secondary Prevention

EtiologyTreatment
Atrial fibrillationDOAC (apixaban preferred)
Vertebral/basilar atherosclerosisDAPT × 21–90 days → single antiplatelet; statin (LDL <70); BP <130/80
Vertebral artery dissectionAntiplatelet or anticoagulation × 3–6 months (equivalent — CADISS)
Small vessel diseaseSingle antiplatelet; BP control

Key Guidelines

SourceYearPMID
ESO/ESMINT BAO Guideline202438752743
VERITAS IPD Meta-analysis (Lancet)202539674187
TRACE-5 Tenecteplase in BAO (Lancet)202641655588
ATTENTION RCT — EVT 0–12h (NEJM)202236239644
BAOCHE RCT — EVT 6–24h (NEJM)202236239645
Scroll up for the full detailed guideline with clinical syndromes, dosing tables, and management algorithms.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.