analyse_media
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching the Web
audiogram interpretation guide sensorineural conductive hearing loss thresholds
Reading File
Reading File
Now I have enough context. Let me provide a thorough interpretation of this audiogram based on all the information gathered.
Audiogram Report - Interpretation
Clinic: Perfect Hearing Solutions, Karan Nagar (Solar Building, Sheikh Ul Alam Hospital Lane, Karan Nagar - 190010)
What the Report Shows
This is a pure-tone audiogram - a standard hearing test that plots the softest sounds a person can detect at different frequencies (pitches), measured in decibels hearing level (dB HL). The x-axis shows frequency (125 Hz to 8000 Hz) and the y-axis shows hearing level from -10 dB (excellent) to 120 dB (profound loss). Louder sounds needed = worse hearing.
Audiogram Symbols Used (Standard)
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| O | Right ear, unmasked air conduction |
| X | Left ear, unmasked air conduction |
| < (pointing right) | Right ear, unmasked bone conduction |
| > (pointing left) | Left ear, unmasked bone conduction |
From the image, the plotted values appear to show X marks and < symbols in the mid-to-lower frequencies, with the audiogram lines dipping downward (worse hearing) at higher frequencies.
Reading the Audiogram Grid
The audiogram plotted in the image shows:
- Right ear (red, O symbols): Thresholds appear to fall around 40-70 dB HL across frequencies - this is in the moderate to moderately-severe range
- Left ear (blue, X symbols): Thresholds appear similarly affected, with a sloping or flat configuration
- The bone conduction markers (< and >) appear to roughly track the air conduction values, suggesting minimal or no air-bone gap
Degree of Hearing Loss (WHO/Standard Classification)
| Range | Classification |
|---|---|
| 0-25 dB HL | Normal |
| 26-40 dB HL | Mild |
| 41-55 dB HL | Moderate |
| 56-70 dB HL | Moderately Severe |
| 71-90 dB HL | Severe |
| >90 dB HL | Profound |
Based on the plotted points, both ears appear to fall in the moderate to moderately-severe range (roughly 40-70 dB HL).
Type of Hearing Loss
Because the bone conduction thresholds (< and >) appear to match the air conduction thresholds (O and X) with little to no gap between them, this pattern is consistent with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) - meaning the problem lies in the cochlea (inner ear) or auditory nerve, not the outer/middle ear.
- No significant air-bone gap = sensorineural (not conductive)
- A large air-bone gap would indicate conductive loss (outer/middle ear problem)
- Both types together = mixed hearing loss
Additional Tests Recorded (Lower Section)
The lower table records:
- Rinne test - comparing air vs. bone conduction with a tuning fork
- Weber test - lateralization test
- BING, ABG, WEBER, RINNE columns visible
- Recruitment - testing for abnormal loudness growth (suggests cochlear origin)
- SISI, SSI - speech/sensitivity tests
- LTS (Loudness Tolerance/Stapedius) values noted
Handwritten entries mention:
- "R2-1-" type notation (likely Rinne results)
- "Special [B?]" notes
- "Hot some" and "14 i/mnd" - possibly treatment/follow-up notes
- "No" under some correction columns, "5G 25" values under SRT/AVE fields
- Referred by Dr. [Nazar/Nazir?], Date visible
Remarks / Handwritten Notes
- "Pr" notation at top left
- "LHI" (possibly Left High-frequency impairment)
- "Courtesy" section with referral information
- "To consider" - likely indicating whether hearing aids are warranted
Clinical Summary
| Feature | Finding |
|---|---|
| Type | Likely Sensorineural (both ears) |
| Degree | Moderate to Moderately-Severe (~40-70 dB HL) |
| Configuration | Relatively flat or gently sloping |
| Bone conduction | Approximately matches air conduction |
| SRT/AVE | ~25 dB (noted in form) |
| Speech discrimination | Not clearly extractable from image |
What This Means Practically
- The patient likely has difficulty hearing conversational speech without amplification, especially in noisy environments
- Moderate SNHL in both ears typically warrants bilateral hearing aid fitting
- The noted SRT of ~25 dB suggests speech recognition threshold is borderline-mild, which may reflect the better-tested frequencies
- The "to consider" note in the remarks section likely refers to hearing aid candidacy
Note: This interpretation is based on visual analysis of a photographed audiogram. For precise threshold values and clinical decision-making, the original audiogram should be reviewed by the prescribing audiologist. The handwritten notes contain some details that are partially illegible in this image quality.
- K.J. Lee's Essential Otolaryngology, Chapter 14 - The Audiogram
- Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery Vol. 2 - The pure-tone audiogram
Type Ad
Finding Sources
Searching the Web
Type Ad tympanogram tympanometry classification Jerger meaning
Finding Sources
Reading Web Page
Type Ad tympanogram meaning causes clinical significance
Reading File
Type Ad Tympanogram
"Ad" stands for "A deep" - it is a subtype of the Type A tympanogram family, classified by Jerger.
What It Looks Like
A Type Ad tympanogram has:
- Peak pressure: Normal (near 0 daPa, same as Type A)
- Peak compliance (height): Abnormally HIGH / exaggerated - the peak is very tall and sharp, often going off the top of the scale (>2.0 mL, sometimes referred to as >1.75-2.0 mmho)
- The pressure at which the peak occurs is normal, but the amplitude of tympanic membrane movement is excessive
What It Means - Causes
A Type Ad pattern indicates hypercompliance - the middle ear system is too mobile/too floppy. Classic causes:
| Cause | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Ossicular chain discontinuity | Disruption between malleus, incus, or stapes removes the dampening resistance, allowing the TM to move excessively |
| Flaccid/atrophic tympanic membrane | Healed perforation site, thin atrophic segment, or monomeric membrane (fibrous layer absent) |
| Post-traumatic ossicular disruption | Head injury, temporal bone fracture |
| Incus necrosis | Chronic otitis media eroding the long process of the incus |
The most clinically significant cause is ossicular chain discontinuity, which produces a characteristic pattern of:
- Type Ad on tympanometry
- Significant conductive hearing loss (30-60 dB air-bone gap) on the audiogram
- Absent or reduced stapedial reflexes
"A type Ad tympanogram may suggest ossicular discontinuity as a cause of conductive hearing loss." - Cummings Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
Jerger Classification - Full Context
| Type | Compliance | Pressure | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Normal | Normal | Normal middle ear |
| As | Low (shallow) | Normal | Stiffness - otosclerosis, tympanosclerosis |
| Ad | High (deep/tall) | Normal | Hypermobility - ossicular discontinuity, flaccid TM |
| B | Flat (no peak) | N/A | Effusion, perforation, cerumen blockage |
| C | Normal/low | Negative | Eustachian tube dysfunction, negative middle ear pressure |
Clinical Relevance
- Type Ad alone does not always indicate pathology - it can occasionally occur in normal ears, particularly in children with very compliant eardrums
- When paired with a conductive hearing loss on pure-tone audiogram and an absent stapedial reflex, ossicular discontinuity becomes the most likely diagnosis
- High-resolution CT of the temporal bones is the imaging of choice to confirm ossicular chain integrity
- Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology notes: "A tympanogram may show unusually high compliance, with a high-peaked Type AD tympanogram, although this may occur in normal ears"
Treatment
Finding Sources
Searching the Web
ossicular chain discontinuity treatment ossiculoplasty tympanoplasty surgical management
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Treatment of Type Ad Tympanogram (Ossicular Discontinuity / Hypercompliance)
Treatment depends on the underlying cause and whether the finding is causing significant conductive hearing loss. There are two main pathways: surgical and non-surgical (amplification).
1. Surgical Treatment - Ossiculoplasty (First-line for Ossicular Discontinuity)
Ossiculoplasty (ossicular chain reconstruction, OCR) is the definitive treatment when Type Ad is caused by ossicular discontinuity. The goal is to restore continuity between the tympanic membrane and the cochlea.
Types of Prostheses Used
| Prosthesis | Full Name | Used When |
|---|---|---|
| PORP | Partial Ossicular Replacement Prosthesis | Stapes head/suprastructure is intact (M+, S+) - bridges malleus to stapes head |
| TORP | Total Ossicular Replacement Prosthesis | Stapes suprastructure absent (M+/M-, S-) - bridges TM/malleus directly to footplate |
| Autograft incus | Patient's own reshaped incus | Incudostapedial dislocation - resculpted as an interposition graft |
| Hydroxylapatite cement | Bone cement | Small lenticular process erosions |
- PORP achieves air-bone gap closure within 20 dB in ~49-57% of cases
- Titanium and hydroxylapatite prostheses show equivalent functional results and stability
- Presence of the manubrium, better preoperative hearing, and canal-wall-up technique are positive prognostic factors
Tympanoplasty Type III (Myringostapediopexy)
When the space between the stapes capitulum and manubrium is small, a cartilage "shield" graft placed medially acts as a de facto Type III tympanoplasty - this achieves an air-bone gap under 25 dB in ~79% of cases, often without needing any prosthesis.
2. Addressing the Underlying Cause First
Before ossiculoplasty, any active disease must be controlled:
| Cause | Specific Management |
|---|---|
| Chronic otitis media | Medical treatment (ear drops, antibiotics) + tympanomastoidectomy to achieve a dry, disease-free ear before reconstruction |
| Cholesteatoma | Canal-wall-up or canal-wall-down mastoidectomy; ossicular reconstruction typically staged (2nd look at 6-12 months) |
| Traumatic dislocation | Timing depends on stability; can repair acutely or electively |
| Flaccid/atrophic TM | Myringoplasty (tympanic membrane repair) ± ossiculoplasty |
3. Non-Surgical Options - Hearing Amplification
For patients who:
- Are not surgical candidates (only hearing ear, poor general health)
- Have mixed hearing loss where the sensorineural component limits surgical benefit
- Are children (defer surgery until age ~10+ to reduce SNHL risk from post-op AOM)
- Prefer non-surgical management
Options include:
- Conventional air-conduction hearing aid - first choice for bilateral moderate conductive hearing loss
- Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid (BAHA) - ideal when air-conduction aids are unsuitable (chronically draining ear, recurrent otitis externa, canal stenosis); delivers sound via osseointegrated titanium implant directly through the skull
- Bone-conduction hearing aid (non-implantable) - softband BAHA for children too young for implant
4. Pre-operative Workup
Before any surgery:
- High-resolution CT temporal bones - mandatory to identify ossicular defect type, middle/inner ear anomalies, and plan reconstruction
- Full audiometric evaluation - to assess sensorineural reserve and set realistic expectations
- Eustachian tube function - poor ET function predicts poorer outcomes
Prognosis
Surgical results depend heavily on the type of defect and middle ear status:
- Best results: intact stapes suprastructure, dry ear, no cholesteatoma
- Worst results: total stapes loss, active infection, poor sensorineural reserve
- Overall, ~50-57% of patients achieve the success criteria (dry ear, no extrusion, ABG ≤20 dB)
"Better hearing before surgery, presence of the manubrium, tympanoplasty alone, and canal-wall-up tympanomastoidectomy were factors associated with successful hearing results." - Shambaugh Surgery of the Ear
- Shambaugh Surgery of the Ear - Ossicular Reconstruction Techniques and Results
- Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery Vol. 2 - Principles of Management
- Cummings Otolaryngology - Audiometry and Hearing Loss
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.