I have all the material needed. Here are 25 USMLE-standard high-yield vignettes across both diseases:
USMLE High-Yield Vignettes: Multiple Sclerosis & SLE
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS — 13 Vignettes
MS Vignette 1 — Classic First Presentation
A 27-year-old woman presents with 4 days of painful blurring of vision in her right eye, worse when looking to the right. She notes colors appear washed out. On exam, a swinging flashlight test reveals the right pupil dilates when light is swung from the left eye. Fundoscopy is normal. The patient had an episode of left leg numbness 18 months ago that lasted 2 weeks and fully resolved.
What is the diagnosis, and what feature on fundoscopy would be expected if the optic nerve inflammation were anterior rather than retrobulbar?
Answer: Retrobulbar optic neuritis as the first clinical episode of multiple sclerosis. The relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD / Marcus Gunn pupil) localizes the lesion to the right optic nerve. The normal fundus reflects retrobulbar inflammation ("the patient sees nothing and the doctor sees nothing"). If the inflammation were anterior (papillitis), disc swelling/edema would be visible.
Teaching Point: Painful monocular vision loss + RAPD + normal fundus = retrobulbar optic neuritis. MS until proven otherwise in a young woman. Prior episode of neurologic deficit separated in time and place clinches dissemination in time and space.
MS Vignette 2 — Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia
A 25-year-old woman reports intermittent horizontal double vision for 3 weeks. On exam, when asked to look to the right, her LEFT eye fails to adduct. Her right eye abducts and shows nystagmus. When asked to converge, both eyes adduct normally. A similar milder finding is noted on left gaze as well.
Where is the lesion? What does bilateral involvement in a young woman suggest?
Answer: The lesion is in the medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) - bilaterally. Left-gaze INO = right MLF lesion; right-gaze INO = left MLF lesion. Convergence is intact because it uses a different pathway (the MLF is not required for convergence).
Teaching Point: Bilateral INO in a young woman = MS until proven otherwise. It is pathognomonic. The MLF connects the CN VI nucleus (PPRF) to the contralateral CN III nucleus. A lesion there = ipsilateral adduction palsy + contralateral abducting nystagmus on lateral gaze.
MS Vignette 3 — Uhthoff vs. True Relapse
A 30-year-old woman with known RRMS calls her neurologist. Every afternoon when she exercises at the gym, her vision in her right eye blurs dramatically and her right leg becomes weak, lasting 30-45 minutes each time. Symptoms completely resolve when she cools down. She also reports an electric shock sensation that runs from her neck down her spine when she looks down at her phone.
What are these two phenomena called, and do either require new treatment?
Answer: (1) Uhthoff phenomenon - transient worsening of prior neurologic symptoms with heat/exercise due to reversible conduction block in demyelinated axons when temperature rises even slightly. (2) Lhermitte sign - electric shock sensation radiating down the spine on neck flexion, caused by a demyelinating plaque in the dorsal cervical spinal cord.
Teaching Point: Neither represents a new relapse. Uhthoff is NOT treated (cooling helps). Lhermitte is a paroxysmal symptom, not a relapse. Both are among the most tested MS-specific phenomena on USMLE. True relapses last >24 hours.
MS Vignette 4 — CSF Findings
A 29-year-old man undergoes lumbar puncture after MRI shows multiple periventricular white matter lesions. CSF results: opening pressure normal, WBC 14 (lymphocytes), protein 60 mg/dL, glucose normal, IgG index elevated (0.82). Electrophoresis shows multiple discrete bands in the CSF gamma region NOT present in a simultaneously run serum sample.
What are these bands called? What is their sensitivity in MS, and what does their presence in BOTH CSF and serum indicate?
Answer: Oligoclonal IgG bands (OCBs) - present in >95% of patients with clinically definite MS. They represent intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis (Type 2 pattern = CSF only, absent in serum). If OCBs are present in BOTH CSF AND serum (Type 3 pattern), this indicates a systemic inflammatory process (e.g., sarcoidosis, CNS infection) rather than isolated CNS disease.
Teaching Point: OCBs in CSF but NOT serum = intrathecal IgG synthesis = MS. The 2017 McDonald criteria allow CSF-specific OCBs to substitute for dissemination in time when DIS is already demonstrated. Markedly elevated CSF protein (>100 mg/dL) or very high WBC (>50) should prompt search for an alternative diagnosis.
MS Vignette 5 — Primary Progressive MS
A 51-year-old man presents with a 16-month history of slowly progressive bilateral leg stiffness, difficulty walking, and urinary urgency. He denies any discrete episodes of worsening or improvement. Exam reveals spastic paraparesis and hyperreflexia. MRI shows spinal cord T2 lesions with relatively few brain lesions. No gadolinium-enhancing lesions. CSF: oligoclonal bands positive.
What type of MS does he have, and which is the ONLY approved disease-modifying therapy?
Answer: Primary Progressive MS (PPMS) - progressive neurologic deterioration from onset for ≥1 year without discrete relapses or remissions. More common in middle-aged men with predominant spinal cord involvement. The only FDA-approved therapy for PPMS is ocrelizumab (anti-CD20 B-cell depleting monoclonal antibody), which reduces disability progression by ~25%.
Teaching Point: PPMS ≠ RRMS. PPMS = no relapses, progressive from onset, older/male, spinal cord dominant. Interferon-beta, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab - all approved for relapsing MS only. Ocrelizumab is the PPMS answer on USMLE.
MS Vignette 6 — Natalizumab Complication
A 36-year-old man with RRMS has been on natalizumab for 3 years. His JC virus antibody index has risen to 3.2. He now presents with 5 weeks of progressive cognitive slowing, right arm weakness, and aphasia. MRI reveals a large, non-enhancing, asymmetric white matter lesion in the left frontal and parietal lobes that crosses gyral boundaries and does not respect vascular territory.
What complication has occurred, and what should be done immediately?
Answer: Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML) caused by reactivation of JC virus (JC polyomavirus) - the most feared complication of natalizumab. PML lesions are large, asymmetric, non-enhancing (unlike MS plaques), cross gyral boundaries, and can be rapidly fatal.
Teaching Point: Risk stratification for PML in natalizumab patients: (1) JC antibody seropositivity, (2) antibody index >0.9, (3) duration >2 years, (4) prior immunosuppressant use. Immediate action = discontinue natalizumab + plasma exchange (PLEX) to accelerate drug removal. Monitor JC antibody index every 6 months. PML vs. MS relapse on MRI: PML = large, non-enhancing, asymmetric; MS plaque = small, oval, periventricular.
MS Vignette 7 — Fingolimod First Dose
A 28-year-old woman with RRMS is started on fingolimod (Gilenya). Six hours after her first dose, her ECG shows a heart rate of 46 bpm and a PR interval of 240 ms. She is asymptomatic.
Why is this happening, and what should be done?
Answer: First-dose bradycardia and AV block - a class effect of fingolimod, a sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator. S1P receptors are expressed on cardiac SA and AV nodal cells; fingolimod activation of S1P receptor subtype 1 on cardiac tissue causes transient bradycardia and AV conduction slowing.
Teaching Point: ALL patients starting fingolimod require 6-hour cardiac monitoring (telemetry) after the first dose. Asymptomatic first-dose bradycardia is an expected pharmacological effect - manage by monitoring. Other fingolimod side effects: macular edema (baseline ophthalmology exam required), pulmonary function changes, herpes encephalitis, lymphopenia. Mechanism = sequesters lymphocytes in lymph nodes by preventing egress.
MS Vignette 8 — Acute Relapse Management
A 33-year-old woman with known RRMS presents with acute onset left-sided weakness and left hemibody numbness for 6 days. MRI confirms a new gadolinium-enhancing lesion. Her neurologist starts high-dose IV methylprednisolone 1g/day × 5 days.
What should the patient be told about the expected outcome and the long-term impact of this treatment?
Answer: IV methylprednisolone will shorten the duration and severity of this relapse. However, it does NOT improve long-term neurologic disability or alter the natural history of MS. The patient may recover faster but is not less likely to accumulate disability over years.
Teaching Point: High-dose IV methylprednisolone = standard for acute MS relapse. Shortens duration only, does NOT change long-term outcome. Disease-modifying therapies (interferons, natalizumab, etc.) reduce future relapse frequency but do not treat acute attacks. The distinction "treats relapse vs. prevents future relapses" is heavily tested.
MS Vignette 9 — MS and Pregnancy Counseling
A 28-year-old woman with RRMS on interferon beta-1a informs her neurologist she is trying to conceive. She is worried her MS will worsen during pregnancy and asks whether she needs to stop her medication.
What should she be told about disease course during pregnancy and medication safety?
Answer: She should be counseled that MS relapses decrease during pregnancy - especially in the 3rd trimester (reduced by ~2/3), due to gestational immunosuppression. However, relapses rebound in the first 3-6 months postpartum. Pregnancy does NOT alter long-term disability. Interferon beta-1a is generally stopped before conception (a variable washout period is recommended); large-molecule DMTs like glatiramer acetate have minimal fetal risk but most neurologists advise stopping before conception.
Teaching Point: "MS gets better in pregnancy, worse after delivery" - the PRIMS pattern. Teriflunomide and mitoxantrone are teratogenic - require washout. Breastfeeding may reduce postpartum relapses. The child's lifetime risk of developing MS is ~3-5% (not zero but reassuringly low).
MS Vignette 10 — Marburg Variant
A 22-year-old woman with no prior neurologic history presents with rapidly progressive quadriparesis, obtundation, and respiratory distress developing over 3 weeks. MRI shows large, tumefactive demyelinating lesions with mass effect bilaterally. She had been in perfect health 1 month ago. No prior relapses. CSF positive for oligoclonal bands.
What is this aggressive form of MS, and what is the prognosis?
Answer: Marburg disease (Acute Progressive MS) - a rare, fulminant variant causing acute or subacute progressive neurologic deterioration in a patient with NO prior MS history, leading to severe disability or death within days to weeks. May progress to a quadriplegic, obtunded state with death from respiratory failure, aspiration, or intercurrent infection.
Teaching Point: Marburg variant = acute MS with tumefactive lesions + rapid deterioration + no prior relapses. Distinguish from ADEM (typically post-infectious, monophasic, children) and CNS lymphoma (ring enhancement, older patient). On USMLE, a rapid decline in a young patient with large demyelinating lesions and no relapsing history = think Marburg.
MS Vignette 11 — McDonald Criteria / Clinically Isolated Syndrome
A 24-year-old woman presents after a single episode of right leg weakness and urinary retention lasting 8 days that resolved. MRI brain shows 3 periventricular lesions and 1 infratentorial lesion. CSF shows oligoclonal bands in CSF only (not serum). There are no gadolinium-enhancing lesions.
Can MS be diagnosed? What criterion allows this with only one clinical attack?
Answer: Yes. Under 2017 McDonald Criteria: dissemination in space (DIS) is satisfied (periventricular + infratentorial lesions = ≥2 of 4 MS locations). Dissemination in time (DIT) is satisfied by the presence of CSF-specific oligoclonal bands, which can substitute for DIT per the 2017 revision. MS can be diagnosed after a single clinical attack if MRI + CSF criteria are met.
Teaching Point: The 2017 update allows OCBs to fulfill the DIT criterion. Pre-2017, a second clinical attack was required. The 4 MS locations for DIS: periventricular, cortical/juxtacortical, infratentorial, spinal cord. ≥2 of these = DIS. This is the most commonly tested McDonald criteria fact.
MS Vignette 12 — MS Mimic (NMOSD)
A 30-year-old woman presents with acute bilateral visual loss and severe weakness with a sensory level at T6. MRI spine shows T2 hyperintensity spanning 6 vertebral segments. Brain MRI shows no periventricular lesions. CSF: oligoclonal bands absent. Serum NMO-IgG (anti-aquaporin-4 antibody) is positive.
What is the diagnosis, and why does the treatment differ critically from MS?
Answer: Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) - the most important MS mimic. Key differences: bilateral/severe optic neuritis, longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (>3 vertebral segments), normal or non-MS pattern brain MRI, OCBs absent in ~80%, anti-AQP4+ in ~70-80%.
Teaching Point: MS therapies can WORSEN NMOSD - particularly interferon-beta and natalizumab. NMOSD is treated with rituximab (anti-CD20), eculizumab, inebilizumab, or satralizumab. Confusing NMOSD for MS is a dangerous clinical error. The USMLE distinguishes them by: LETM (>3 segments) + no OCBs + anti-AQP4+ = NMOSD.
MS Vignette 13 — Symptomatic Management
A 40-year-old man with long-standing RRMS has developed severe fatigue ("the most disabling thing in my life"), leg spasms and stiffness that limit walking, and urinary urgency with incontinence. He is asking about medication options for each of these issues.
What is the first-line pharmacologic treatment for each symptom?
Answer:
- Fatigue: Amantadine (first-line) or modafinil
- Spasticity: Baclofen (oral; 5-160 mg/day in divided doses) or tizanidine; intrathecal baclofen pump for severe cases
- Urinary urgency/incontinence (overactive bladder/detrusor hyperreflexia): Oxybutynin or tolterodine (anticholinergics)
- Neuropathic pain: gabapentin, carbamazepine, tricyclics (amitriptyline)
Teaching Point: Fatigue is the most common and often most disabling symptom of MS. Amantadine is first-line, not stimulants. Baclofen = spasticity. Oxybutynin = overactive bladder (urgency/incontinence). If the patient has urinary RETENTION (detrusor areflexia = different mechanism), treat with bethanechol or intermittent self-catheterization.
SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS — 12 Vignettes
SLE Vignette 1 — Classic Presentation / Serology
A 22-year-old African-American woman presents with 3 months of joint pain in her hands and wrists, facial rash across her cheeks sparing the nasolabial folds, painful mouth sores, and profound fatigue. CBC shows hemoglobin 9.0 g/dL (Coombs-positive), WBC 2,400, platelets 85,000. ANA 1:1280, anti-dsDNA positive, anti-Smith positive, C3 and C4 both low.
What is the diagnosis? Which antibody is most specific? Which should be monitored for disease activity?
Answer: SLE - meets ≥10 points on 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria. Anti-Smith is most specific (55-100% specificity) for SLE. Anti-dsDNA should be monitored for disease activity - its titer correlates with flares, especially lupus nephritis. ANA is the best screening test (sensitivity ~95%) but is NOT specific.
Teaching Point: ANA = sensitive, not specific. Anti-Sm = most specific, doesn't fluctuate with activity. Anti-dsDNA = specific + tracks activity. Low complement (C3, C4) = complement consumption by immune complexes = active disease. The classic "butterfly rash" spares nasolabial folds (distinguishes from rosacea and seborrheic dermatitis which involve nasolabial folds).
SLE Vignette 2 — Lupus Nephritis Flare Recognition
A 28-year-old woman with SLE returns for follow-up feeling well with no complaints. Her labs show: anti-dsDNA risen from 1:80 to 1:640; C3 fallen from 92 to 44 mg/dL; C4 from 18 to 6 mg/dL; creatinine risen from 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL; urinalysis: 2+ protein, 15 RBCs/hpf, occasional granular casts.
What do these findings indicate, and what is the next step?
Answer: Subclinical lupus nephritis flare - the patient is asymptomatic, but rising anti-dsDNA + falling complement + hematuria/proteinuria/casts = active glomerulonephritis. Next step: renal biopsy to classify the lesion (Class III, IV, or V) because treatment differs significantly. Waiting until symptoms appear risks irreversible renal scarring.
Teaching Point: "Rising anti-dsDNA + falling C3/C4 = lupus nephritis incoming" is the most high-yield pattern in SLE monitoring. A patient feeling well does NOT exclude active organ damage. Always biopsy before starting aggressive immunosuppression for nephritis (MFF vs cyclophosphamide decision depends on class).
SLE Vignette 3 — Wire-Loop Nephritis (Pathology)
A 24-year-old woman with SLE undergoes renal biopsy for nephrotic-range proteinuria and rising creatinine. Light microscopy shows global endocapillary proliferation in >60% of glomeruli with thickened capillary walls (wire-loop appearance). Immunofluorescence shows "full house" pattern (IgG, IgM, IgA, C3, C1q). Electron microscopy shows massive subendothelial deposits.
What class is this? What is the treatment?
Answer: Class IV - Diffuse Proliferative Lupus Nephritis - the most severe class, highest risk of ESRD. Full-house IF + wire-loop lesions + diffuse global involvement on LM. Treatment: induction with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) OR IV cyclophosphamide + high-dose corticosteroids, followed by maintenance with MMF or azathioprine + hydroxychloroquine.
Teaching Point: Class IV = most common cause of ESRD in SLE. Wire-loop = subendothelial deposits (compared to Class V membranous = subepithelial "spike and dome" on EM). Full-house immunofluorescence (IgG + IgM + IgA + C3 + C1q) is pathognomonic for lupus nephritis. MMF is preferred over cyclophosphamide in African-American and Hispanic patients.
SLE Vignette 4 — Drug-Induced Lupus
A 65-year-old man with hypertension has been on hydralazine for 5 years. He presents with bilateral arthralgia, pleuritis, and a mild rash. Labs: ANA positive, anti-histone antibodies positive, anti-dsDNA NEGATIVE, C3 and C4 NORMAL, creatinine normal, no CNS symptoms.
What is this condition, and how does it differ from true SLE?
Answer: Drug-Induced Lupus (DIL). Key distinguishing features: anti-histone antibodies are the hallmark (vs. anti-dsDNA in true SLE), complement is NORMAL (no immune complex organ deposition), renal and CNS involvement are ABSENT. Most importantly: it resolves when the causative drug is stopped.
Teaching Point: Classic DIL drugs = Procainamide (most common), Hydralazine, Isoniazid, Sulfonamides, Minocycline (PHISM). DIL = anti-histone+ / anti-dsDNA− / complement normal / no renal or CNS. True SLE = anti-dsDNA+ / complement low / can involve any organ. DIL resolves off the drug; true SLE does not.
SLE Vignette 5 — APS Paradox
A 32-year-old woman with SLE presents with a DVT in her left leg. Her aPTT is prolonged at 65 seconds; PT is normal. Platelets are 90,000. She has had two first-trimester miscarriages. Tests for lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin IgG, and anti-β2-GP1 are positive on two occasions 12 weeks apart.
Explain the apparent paradox of a prolonged aPTT in a patient with thrombosis, not bleeding.
Answer: Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). The "lupus anticoagulant" paradoxically prolongs aPTT in vitro (it interferes with phospholipid-dependent clotting assays in the test tube) but is strongly PRO-thrombotic in vivo (promotes clot formation by interfering with natural anticoagulant pathways, activating platelets, and promoting endothelial dysfunction). This paradox is one of the most tested USMLE concepts.
Teaching Point: Lupus anticoagulant = prolonged aPTT + NOT corrected by mixing study + thrombosis + recurrent pregnancy loss. Treatment: aspirin + heparin in pregnancy; warfarin (INR 2-3) for non-pregnant thrombosis. DOACs are inferior to warfarin in triple-positive APS (lupus anticoagulant + anticardiolipin + anti-β2-GP1). Warfarin is TERATOGENIC - switch to LMWH in pregnancy.
SLE Vignette 6 — Libman-Sacks Endocarditis
A 27-year-old woman with SLE and antiphospholipid antibodies has a routine echocardiogram. It shows small, irregular, flat vegetations on both the atrial and ventricular surfaces of the mitral valve. She is afebrile; three blood cultures are negative; no leukocytosis.
What is this finding? How is it distinguished from infective endocarditis and rheumatic heart disease?
Answer: Libman-Sacks endocarditis - sterile verrucous vegetations found on BOTH surfaces of heart valves (atrial AND ventricular), classically on the mitral valve. Associated with SLE and antiphospholipid antibodies.
| Libman-Sacks | Infective Endocarditis | Rheumatic Fever |
|---|
| Surface | Both (atrial + ventricular) | Destructive, irregular | Atrial surface only |
| Culture | Negative | Positive | Negative |
| Size | Small, flat | Large, bulky | Small, at line of closure |
Teaching Point: Libman-Sacks = SLE/APS. Main complication = systemic EMBOLISM (stroke). Does NOT require antibiotics. Treat underlying SLE + anticoagulate (especially if APS). The "both surfaces" detail is the key USMLE distinguisher.
SLE Vignette 7 — Neonatal Lupus
A 26-year-old anti-Ro/SSA-positive woman delivers a healthy-appearing baby. At 3 weeks of age, the infant develops a photosensitive circular rash on the face and scalp. Neonatology notes that a fetal echocardiogram performed at 24 weeks had detected complete AV block.
Which features of neonatal lupus are transient and which are permanent?
Answer: Neonatal Lupus Erythematosus (NLE) due to transplacental anti-Ro/SSA (and anti-La/SSB) IgG antibodies. Transient (resolve by 6-8 months as maternal antibodies clear): cutaneous rash, hepatic abnormalities, thrombocytopenia. Permanent: congenital complete AV block (CHB) - anti-Ro antibodies cause inflammatory destruction and fibrosis of the fetal AV node, which does not regenerate. CHB may require a permanent pacemaker.
Teaching Point: Congenital CHB risk = ~2% if mother is anti-Ro+; ~15-20% if prior affected child. Hydroxychloroquine in the mother reduces CHB risk. Fetal echocardiography every 1-2 weeks from 16-26 weeks gestation in anti-Ro+ mothers. Rash resolves - heart block does not.
SLE Vignette 8 — Neuropsychiatric SLE
A 20-year-old woman with known SLE presents to the ER with new-onset auditory hallucinations and disorganized thinking over 48 hours. She is on prednisone 60 mg/day for a recent lupus flare. Workup including cultures, LP, and brain MRI are unremarkable. Anti-dsDNA is unchanged; complement levels are stable.
What are the two most important diagnoses to rule out before attributing this to neuropsychiatric SLE?
Answer: (1) Glucocorticoid-induced psychosis - high-dose steroids (especially prednisone >40 mg/day) can cause psychosis, mania, and depression. (2) Infectious encephalitis - immunosuppressed SLE patients are at high risk. Because complement and anti-dsDNA are stable (no lupus flare marker), steroid-induced psychosis is the leading diagnosis here; manage by dose reduction or adding an antipsychotic rather than increasing immunosuppression.
Teaching Point: NPSLE is a diagnosis of exclusion. Neuropsychiatric features in SLE = always rule out: steroid toxicity, infection, CNS vasculitis, antiphospholipid stroke. Common NPSLE manifestations: seizures (20%), cognitive dysfunction, mood disorders, psychosis, headache. Anti-ribosomal P antibodies are associated with neuropsychiatric lupus specifically.
SLE Vignette 9 — False-Positive VDRL in SLE
A 23-year-old woman with SLE is found to have a positive VDRL during routine screening. She denies sexual risk factors. The FTA-ABS (fluorescent treponemal antibody) confirmatory test is NEGATIVE.
What explains this finding, and what is its clinical significance?
Answer: False-positive VDRL/RPR in SLE - 8-20% of SLE patients have a false-positive VDRL or RPR. The test detects antibodies to cardiolipin (a phospholipid), and antiphospholipid antibodies in SLE cross-react with the VDRL antigen. The FTA-ABS (treponemal-specific) is negative, confirming no syphilis infection.
Teaching Point: False-positive VDRL = antiphospholipid antibodies. This is actually a clue to test for APS. A chronic false-positive VDRL/RPR in a young woman should prompt evaluation for SLE and antiphospholipid syndrome. Similarly, the PT/aPTT paradox (prolonged aPTT + thrombosis not bleeding) is the lab signature of APS.
SLE Vignette 10 — SLE Medications in Pregnancy
A 30-year-old woman with SLE and biopsy-proven Class IV lupus nephritis in remission is taking mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 2g/day and hydroxychloroquine. She is now 7 weeks pregnant.
What immediate medication change is required, and which medication must be continued at all costs?
Answer: MMF must be stopped immediately - it is teratogenic (causes external ear anomalies, cleft lip/palate, digit abnormalities) and is contraindicated in pregnancy. It should be switched to azathioprine, which is safe in pregnancy. Hydroxychloroquine must be continued - stopping it is associated with increased lupus flares, preeclampsia risk, and neonatal CHB in anti-Ro+ mothers. It has no fetal teratogenicity.
Teaching Point: SLE pregnancy medication rules: Continue = HCQ + azathioprine + low-dose steroids + low-dose aspirin (for preeclampsia prevention). Stop = MMF, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, warfarin, NSAIDs (3rd trimester). MMF is one of the most-tested pregnancy-contraindicated drugs on USMLE.
SLE Vignette 11 — Discoid Lupus vs. SLE
A 45-year-old woman presents with a 3-year history of scarring plaques on her face, ears, and scalp with central hypopigmentation and alopecia. She denies arthralgia, fever, or fatigue. ANA is weakly positive (1:80); anti-dsDNA negative; complement normal; urinalysis normal; CBC normal.
What is the diagnosis, and what is her risk of developing systemic lupus?
Answer: Discoid Lupus Erythematosus (DLE) - the most common form of chronic cutaneous lupus. DLE involves scarring, follicular plugging, dyspigmentation. Crucially, most DLE patients do NOT have systemic disease - ~5-10% progress to SLE. Her normal labs (complement, anti-dsDNA, CBC, urinalysis) and minimal ANA support isolated cutaneous disease.
Teaching Point: DLE = scarring alopecia + follicular plugging + scarring + face/ears/scalp. SCLE (subacute cutaneous lupus) = annular or papulosquamous rash, photosensitive, NON-scarring, associated with anti-Ro. ACLE (acute cutaneous lupus) = malar butterfly rash, occurs with systemic flares. DLE can occur in isolation. SCLE is associated with anti-Ro/SSA and can cause neonatal lupus.
SLE Vignette 12 — Shrinking Lung Syndrome
A 35-year-old woman with long-standing SLE develops progressive dyspnea on exertion. CXR shows small lung volumes bilaterally and elevated hemidiaphragms. PFTs show a restrictive pattern with reduced FVC and TLC but normal DLCO and no obstructive pattern. CT chest shows no parenchymal infiltrates or fibrosis. Pleural surfaces are clear.
What is this pulmonary complication of SLE, and what is its mechanism?
Answer: Shrinking Lung Syndrome (SLS) - a rare but classic SLE pulmonary complication characterized by reduced lung volumes, elevated hemidiaphragms, and dyspnea WITHOUT parenchymal lung disease. The mechanism involves diaphragmatic dysfunction (phrenic nerve involvement or myopathic process causing diaphragm weakness) leading to reduced inspiratory capacity and restrictive ventilatory pattern.
Teaching Point: Shrinking lung = SLE + small lung volumes + elevated hemidiaphragms + restrictive PFTs + NO parenchymal disease on CT. This distinguishes it from lupus pneumonitis (ground-glass infiltrates), pulmonary HTN (normal PFTs, elevated PA pressure), and pleural disease (effusions). Seen in late/chronic SLE. Tested as the bizarre restrictive pattern with no infiltrates.
Complete Vignette Index at a Glance
MS Vignettes (13)
| # | Scenario | Key Teaching Point |
|---|
| 1 | Retrobulbar optic neuritis | Painful monocular vision loss + RAPD + normal fundus |
| 2 | Bilateral INO | MLF lesion; bilateral = pathognomonic MS |
| 3 | Uhthoff + Lhermitte | Neither = relapse; both = transient/paroxysmal |
| 4 | CSF oligoclonal bands | Type 2 OCBs = intrathecal synthesis; 2017 McDonald DIT criterion |
| 5 | PPMS - ocrelizumab | Only PPMS therapy; middle-aged men; no relapses |
| 6 | Natalizumab → PML | JC virus reactivation; large non-enhancing lesion |
| 7 | Fingolimod first-dose | S1P modulator → bradycardia → 6h cardiac monitoring |
| 8 | Acute relapse treatment | IV methylprednisolone shortens relapse only, NOT disability |
| 9 | MS in pregnancy | Relapses ↓ in pregnancy, ↑ postpartum; teriflunomide teratogenic |
| 10 | Marburg variant | Acute fulminant MS; tumefactive lesions; no prior relapses |
| 11 | McDonald criteria | One attack + DIS on MRI + CSF OCBs = MS diagnosis |
| 12 | NMOSD mimic | Anti-AQP4+, LETM >3 segments; interferons WORSEN NMOSD |
| 13 | Symptomatic management | Amantadine/baclofen/oxybutynin for fatigue/spasticity/bladder |
SLE Vignettes (12)
| # | Scenario | Key Teaching Point |
|---|
| 1 | Classic presentation | Anti-Sm = most specific; anti-dsDNA = monitors activity |
| 2 | Subclinical nephritis flare | Rising anti-dsDNA + falling C3/C4 → biopsy regardless of symptoms |
| 3 | Class IV wire-loop nephritis | Diffuse proliferative LN; subendothelial deposits; MMF/CYC induction |
| 4 | Drug-induced lupus | Anti-histone+ / complement normal / no renal-CNS / resolves off drug |
| 5 | APS paradox | Prolonged aPTT in vitro = thrombotic in vivo; heparin in pregnancy |
| 6 | Libman-Sacks endocarditis | Both valve surfaces; sterile; embolism risk; no antibiotics |
| 7 | Neonatal lupus | Anti-Ro → rash (transient) + CHB (permanent pacemaker) |
| 8 | Neuropsychiatric SLE | Rule out steroid psychosis + infection before diagnosing NPSLE |
| 9 | False-positive VDRL | Cross-reacts with antiphospholipid antibodies; FTA-ABS negative |
| 10 | SLE in pregnancy | Stop MMF → azathioprine; continue hydroxychloroquine always |
| 11 | Discoid lupus | Scarring + follicular plugging; mostly no systemic disease |
| 12 | Shrinking lung syndrome | Diaphragm dysfunction; restrictive PFTs + no parenchymal CT findings |
*Sources: Goldman-Cecil Medicine 2025, Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine 22E, Adams and Victor's Principles of Neurology 12th Ed., Bradley and Daroff's Neurology, Creasy & Resnik's Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Brenner & Rector's The Kidney, Robbins Pathology, Katzung's Pharmacology 16th Ed.*Here is the complete set of 25 USMLE-style vignettes - 13 from MS and 12 from SLE - structured as short clinical scenarios with a targeted answer and a dedicated teaching point for each.
How they're organized:
Each vignette follows the USMLE format:
- A 2-4 sentence clinical scenario (age, sex, symptoms, labs/findings)
- A focused question (diagnosis, mechanism, next step, treatment decision)
- A concise answer
- A "Teaching Point" summarizing exactly what USMLE expects you to know
What's covered across the 25 vignettes:
| MS (13) | SLE (12) |
|---|
| Retrobulbar optic neuritis + RAPD | Classic presentation + antibody hierarchy |
| Bilateral INO → MLF localization | Subclinical nephritis (asymptomatic flare) |
| Uhthoff phenomenon + Lhermitte sign | Class IV wire-loop nephritis + treatment |
| CSF oligoclonal bands (Type 2 pattern) | Drug-induced lupus (hydralazine/procainamide) |
| PPMS + ocrelizumab as only therapy | APS paradox (prolonged aPTT + thrombosis) |
| Natalizumab → PML (JC virus) | Libman-Sacks endocarditis |
| Fingolimod first-dose bradycardia | Neonatal lupus (CHB permanent, rash transient) |
| Acute relapse → IV methylprednisolone | Neuropsychiatric SLE vs. steroid psychosis |
| MS in pregnancy (PRIMS pattern) | False-positive VDRL |
| Marburg variant (acute fulminant MS) | MMF contraindicated in pregnancy → azathioprine |
| McDonald 2017 criteria (one attack) | Discoid lupus (mostly no systemic disease) |
| NMOSD mimic (anti-AQP4, LETM) | Shrinking lung syndrome |
| Symptomatic management (amantadine/baclofen/oxybutynin) | |