Comparison chart between crvo , brco , hemi crvo & cilioretinal artery occlusion. Take reference from kanski

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
I now have enough comprehensive data from Kanski's to build the comparison chart. Let me compile it.

Comparison Chart: CRVO, BRVO, Hemi-CRVO & Cilioretinal Artery Occlusion

Reference: Kanski's Clinical Ophthalmology, A Systematic Approach, 10th Edition

Overview Table

FeatureCRVOBRVOHemi-CRVOCilioretinal Artery Occlusion
DefinitionOcclusion of the central retinal vein at or behind the lamina cribrosaOcclusion of a branch retinal vein, typically at an AV crossingOcclusion of one of the two trunks of the CRV (superior or inferior hemiretina)Occlusion of the cilioretinal artery (a branch of the posterior ciliary circulation)
Site of occlusionCentral retinal vein at lamina cribrosaAV crossing point (arteriovenous nicking)Proximal trunk of CRV (superior or inferior division)Cilioretinal artery — arises from PCA, not CRA
Quadrants affectedAll 4 quadrantsOne quadrant (most often superotemporal)One hemiretina (superior or inferior)Papillomacular bundle / limited macular territory
Most common associationHypertension, open-angle glaucoma, hyperviscositySystemic hypertension (#1 cause), hyperlipidaemiaSimilar to CRVOMay occur in isolation, with CRVO, or with CRAO

Symptoms & Visual Acuity

FeatureCRVOBRVOHemi-CRVOCilioretinal Artery Occlusion
OnsetSudden, painlessSudden, painless (peripheral may be asymptomatic)Sudden, painlessSudden, painless
Vision lossVariable — from mild blur to severe; depends on ischaemic vs non-ischaemicDepends on macular involvement; peripheral = asymptomaticSimilar to CRVO but affects only half the fieldCentral/paracentral scotoma if macular territory supplied
VA in non-ischaemic6/6 – 6/18 typicallyRanges from 6/9 to worseMild-moderate lossMay be profound if papillomacular bundle involved
VA in ischaemic≤6/60 (≤3/60 in severe cases)Less often ischaemic than CRVO≤6/60 if ischaemic
MetamorphopsiaPresent if CMOPresent if macular involvementPresentPresent

Fundus Signs

FeatureCRVOBRVOHemi-CRVOCilioretinal Artery Occlusion
HaemorrhagesFlame-shaped + dot/blot in all 4 quadrants ("stormy sunset")Flame-shaped + dot/blot confined to one quadrantFlame-shaped haemorrhages in one hemiretina (superior or inferior)Wedge/sector of superficial white retinal oedema in cilioretinal territory
DistributionAll quadrants, more marked in peripheryAlong distribution of occluded veinHemi-distribution (superior or inferior half)Papillomacular bundle territory
Vein dilatation/tortuosityAll retinal veins dilated and tortuousAffected venous segment onlyAffected hemiretinal veinsNot applicable (arterial occlusion)
Cotton-wool spotsCommonMay be presentPresentPresent in ischaemic area
Disc changesDisc swelling common; disc collaterals in chronic stageLess common; collaterals near non-perfused zoneSimilar to CRVODisc may appear normal or swollen if simultaneous CRVO
Macular oedema (CMO)Very common; centralCommon; if macula drained by occluded veinSimilar to CRVOCentral/paracentral
Cherry-red spotAbsentAbsentAbsentMay mimic CRAO if extensive; present if CRAO coexists
Collateral vesselsOpticociliary shunts on disc (chronic)Collaterals crossing horizontal rapheOpticociliary shuntsNot typically seen

FA / Investigations

FeatureCRVOBRVOHemi-CRVOCilioretinal Artery Occlusion
FA patternDelayed AV transit time; masking by haemorrhage; capillary non-perfusion; vessel wall stainingPeripheral + macular ischaemia; delayed venous filling; collaterals in established diseaseSimilar to CRVO but confined to hemiretinaDelayed filling/non-filling of cilioretinal artery territory; hypofluorescence from retinal swelling
Ischaemic threshold (FA)>10 disc areas of capillary non-perfusion → high NV risk>5 disc areas of non-perfusion → high NV risk>10 disc areas (hemiretina)
OCTQuantifies CMOQuantifies CMOQuantifies CMOMacular thickening in territory
ERGDepressed in ischaemic CRVO; used to assess NV riskLess commonly performed

Classification

FeatureCRVOBRVOHemi-CRVOCilioretinal Artery Occlusion
TypesNon-ischaemic (perfused) vs Ischaemic (non-perfused)Major BRVO vs Macular BRVOIschaemic vs Non-ischaemicIsolated / with CRAO / with CRVO
Non-ischaemic featuresVA >6/60; capillary perfusion intact; disc collaterals may formMilder presentation; better VAVA preserved; milder course
Ischaemic featuresVA ≤6/60; RAPD; >10 DA non-perfusion; NVI risk high>5 DA non-perfusion; NVE risk ~8% at 3 yearsSimilar to ischaemic CRVO

Complications

FeatureCRVOBRVOHemi-CRVOCilioretinal Artery Occlusion
Neovascularization~5% retinal NV; iris/angle NV (rubeosis) in ~20–30% of ischaemicNVE ~8% at 3 years; NVI/NVG much less common (2–3%)Similar to CRVO but slightly lower risk (opticociliary collaterals may be protective)Low risk
Neovascular glaucomaHigh risk in ischaemic CRVO2–3% at 3 yearsLower risk if opticociliary shunts developRare
Chronic CMOVery common; major cause of visual lossMost common cause of persistent poor VACommonCommon if macular territory involved
Vitreous haemorrhageOccurs; severe haemorrhage can occur (~5% NVE)From NVE/NVDSimilarUncommon
Tractional RDRare, secondary to NVRare, secondary to NVERareRare
Epiretinal membrane / RPE changesChronic atrophic changes, RPE hyperplasiaChronic changesSimilar

Management

FeatureCRVOBRVOHemi-CRVOCilioretinal Artery Occlusion
Macular oedema RxIntravitreal anti-VEGF (ranibizumab/aflibercept/bevacizumab); Dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex); IVT triamcinoloneAnti-VEGF; dexamethasone implant; IVT triamcinolone; adjunctive macular laserSimilar to CRVOAnti-VEGF for CMO if present
Laser for CMONot beneficial for VA (CRVO)Macular grid laser (adjunctive; less popular post-anti-VEGF era)Similar to CRVOFocal/grid laser (adjunctive)
NV managementPRP (1500–2000 burns) without delay for NVI/NVA; anti-VEGF adjunctSector photocoagulation for NVE/NVDPRP as per CRVORarely needed
ObservationIf VA good and non-ischaemic: observe; 3-monthly follow-up × 2 yrsVA 6/9 or better/improving: observe; 3-monthly × 2 yrsSimilarSimilar
Key trials (CMO)CRUISE (ranibizumab), COPERNICUS (aflibercept), GENEVA (Ozurdex), COMRADE, SCOREBRIGHTER, VIBRANT (aflibercept), GENEVA
Systemic workupBP, FBC, lipids, glucose, ESR, coag screen, ACE, autoantibodies; carotid duplexBP, lipids; further workup if <50 yrs, bilateral, or recurrentSame as CRVOUrgent systemic workup (cardiovascular + GCA screen)

Prognosis

FeatureCRVOBRVOHemi-CRVOCilioretinal Artery Occlusion
Visual outcomeVariable; non-ischaemic better; ischaemic poorGenerally better than CRVO; collaterals = favourable signIntermediate between CRVO and BRVOGood if isolated (small territory); poor if CRAO coexists
Conversion risk~30% non-ischaemic → ischaemic within 3 yrsLow conversionModerate
Resolution of acute signs9–12 months6–12 monthsSimilar to CRVOWeeks to months

All data sourced from Kanski's Clinical Ophthalmology: A Systematic Approach, 10th Edition (Elsevier), Chapter 13.

Key Distinguishing Points (Kanski's Pearls):
  • CRVO is the most severe — all-quadrant "stormy sunset" fundus, highest NVG risk
  • BRVO most commonly affects the superotemporal quadrant; hypertension is the #1 cause
  • Hemi-CRVO behaves like a "half CRVO" — opticociliary shunts that form may be protective against neovascularization
  • Cilioretinal artery occlusion in isolation (without CRVO or CRAO) often carries a good prognosis since the territory supplied is limited; when it occurs with CRVO, it signals a more complex ischaemic event
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.