I now have comprehensive material. Here is the full structured overview:
Prosthesis After Maxillectomy
Overview
Maxillectomy creates an oronasal/oroantral defect that impairs speech, swallowing, mastication, and facial aesthetics. Two broad reconstruction strategies exist: prosthetic obturation and free tissue transfer (microvascular reconstruction). Prior to the advent of reliable free flap surgery, obturation was the primary method of management. Today it remains a valuable option in specific clinical contexts, and the decision between the two approaches must be individualized and multidisciplinary.
Multidisciplinary Team (MDT)
Prosthetic rehabilitation should be led by the maxillofacial prosthodontist in close collaboration with:
- Head and neck surgeon
- Oncologist/radiation oncologist
- Speech and language therapist
- Dental hygienist
- Specialist dental/facial prosthetic technicians
- The patient's primary dental practitioner (in dentate patients)
Classification of Maxillectomy Defects
Two classification systems guide decision-making:
- Brown's classification - surgery-based; widely used to decide between surgical reconstruction and obturation. When the defect extends beyond level 2, obturation yields increasingly poor results and surgical reconstruction is preferred
- Okay's classification - more directed at the maxillofacial prosthodontist; guides obturator design based on the remaining dental configuration following surgery
General principle: The more extensive the defect, the stronger the case for free tissue transfer. Defects involving the orbital floor should be reconstructed surgically wherever possible to prevent inferior displacement of the globe.
Pre-surgical Assessment
All patients should be evaluated by the maxillofacial prosthodontist before surgery:
- Screening panoramic dental radiograph + detailed oral examination
- Decision-making on dental extractions, restorations, and pre-prosthetic preparation
- Impressions and dental models taken pre-operatively (mandatory for dentate patients; may not be required for edentulous patients already wearing a well-extended prosthesis)
- Planning for osseointegrated implant placement (primary at time of surgery or secondary)
- A clear explanation to the patient of the staged prosthetic process and follow-up requirements
The Three Stages of Obturator Provision
Stage 1: Surgical Obturator (Immediate)
Inserted at the time of surgery, prior to extubation.
Purpose:
- Separates oral and nasal/antral cavities immediately
- Supports cheek soft tissues
- Assists haemostasis
- Enables early speech and swallowing
Construction:
- Pre-operative dental models allow fabrication of a tooth-bearing obturator; alternatively a simple clear acrylic cover plate is used when time is limited
- Obturating material options: addition-cured silicone putty (preferred - engages undercuts, supports cheek, assists haemostasis), black gutta percha, foam products
Retention of surgical obturator:
- Small defects with sufficient remaining teeth: dental clasps suffice
- Larger defects: bone screws and/or circum-zygomatic wires
Post-operative management:
- Requires regular removal and modification as the defect heals and shrinks
- Small defects: managed in outpatient clinic
- Large defects (especially with circum-zygomatic wires): may require return to the operating room
- Generally left in situ for 6-8 weeks post-operatively
Stage 2: Interim Obturator
- Provided after wound healing, typically at ~6-8 weeks
- The defect continues to change shape during this phase; the interim obturator is adjusted as required
- Allows the patient to resume eating, speech rehabilitation continues
- Transition period lasting several months while the defect matures
Stage 3: Definitive Obturator
- Constructed once the defect has fully healed and stabilized (typically 3-6+ months post-surgery, longer if radiotherapy is given)
- A bespoke, carefully crafted prosthesis that restores form and function optimally
Surgical Modifications to Facilitate Obturator Provision
Several surgical techniques at the time of maxillectomy improve the quality of prosthetic rehabilitation:
- Bone cuts through edentulous areas or extraction sockets - preserves periodontal bone support of remaining abutment teeth, which are vital for obturator retention
- Palatal mucosal incisions made lateral to bone cuts - creates a keratinized mucosal flap that folds over the cut bone edge, cushioning the prosthesis during masticatory function
- Split-skin graft to the cheek defect - produces a scar band within the cheek that assists retention of the obturator (one of the few retentive surfaces available in conventional obturation)
- Removal of the inferior turbinate(s) - creates more vertical space for the obturator and prevents future trauma to prolapsed turbinate tissue
- Smoothing of sharp bony margins - essential for all prosthetic rehabilitation
Obturator Design
Simple Obturator
- For low-level partial maxillectomy defects
- A soft silicone bung engages natural undercuts in the defect for retention
Simple maxillary obturator prosthesis with integral soft bung to engage defect undercuts - Scott-Brown's Vol. 3
Multi-Part Obturator
- Used when trismus limits access for impressions or prosthesis insertion/removal
- Trismus is common post-maxillectomy, especially after radiotherapy
- Impressions are taken in several parts using a multi-part technique
- The definitive obturator has a separate obturator component that inserts directly into the defect and attaches to the overlying dental component via magnet linkage
2-part obturator: the obturator component (left) and dental prosthesis component (right), joined intra-orally by magnets - Scott-Brown's Vol. 3
Osseointegrated Implants in Maxillary Obturation
When conventional obturator retention is inadequate - particularly in:
- Extensive maxillary defects
- Edentulous patients
- Patients with severe trismus
- Patients with few or no remaining teeth
Osseointegrated implants dramatically improve retention and stability.
Zygomatic Implants
- Particularly useful for large maxillary defects where there is insufficient alveolar bone for standard implants
- Achieve very high initial stability and can support the obturator at an early stage
- Multiple zygomatic implants are typically splinted together with a retentive bar, and the obturator clips or screws onto this bar
- Should ideally be placed at the time of primary resection if post-operative radiotherapy is planned, to allow osseointegration before radiotherapy-induced changes compromise implant success
- When implant-retained, the need for the prosthesis to deeply engage the defect undercuts is greatly reduced
Standard Dental Implants
- Placed in residual alveolar bone or in reconstructed bone (e.g., fibula flap)
- Can provide excellent retention in partially dentate patients with smaller defects
Facial Prostheses (Midfacial/Orbital Defects)
When maxillectomy extends to involve the midface, orbit, or nose, silicone-based facial prostheses are used. These are distinct from intra-oral obturators and address external facial defects.
Retention methods (evolution):
- Traditionally: skin adhesives, spectacle frames, mechanical undercuts
- Modern standard: osseointegrated craniofacial implants (last 30 years)
- Conventional adhesive-retained prostheses remain useful but are difficult to locate accurately, prone to dislodgement, and cause skin irritation
Pre-prosthetic surgical principles:
- Remove small areas of unsupported tissue to provide a solid margin
- Keep bulk of vascularized flaps in this area minimal (or debulk before prosthesis construction)
- Smooth sharp bony margins
- Use split-skin grafts within the orbit: provide a stable, hair-free, drier surface
- For rhinectomy: preserve nasal bones when oncologically safe - assists prosthesis retention
Obturator vs. Free Flap Reconstruction
| Factor | Obturator Favoured | Free Flap Favoured |
|---|
| Defect size | Small-moderate (level 1-2) | Large (level 3+) |
| Orbital floor involvement | No | Yes |
| Dental status | Dentate (good retention) | Edentulous |
| Oncologic surveillance | Obturator allows direct inspection | Flap obscures defect |
| Patient fitness | Poor surgical candidate | Good surgical candidate |
| HRQoL (large defects) | Worse (esp. if edentulous + XRT) | Better for complex resections |
HRQoL evidence: Obturator prosthesis is a highly positive and non-invasive approach for quality of life in maxillectomy defects. However, for large complex resections (palate + maxilla + sinuses + orbital content), microvascular reconstruction yields better HRQoL outcomes. Edentulous obturated patients have worse outcomes than dentate patients; adjuvant radiotherapy further worsens mouth opening and oral/swallowing function.
Complications and Challenges
- Trismus - limits access for impressions, insertion/removal; may necessitate extraction of additional teeth and multi-part obturator design
- Radiotherapy effects - xerostomia, trismus, mucositis, compromised implant osseointegration, increased risk of osteoradionecrosis with implants placed post-radiotherapy
- Retention difficulties - especially in edentulous patients and large defects; addressed with implants
- Globe displacement - inferior drop of globe if orbital floor not reconstructed
- Lip contracture - can occur after level 2 maxillectomy and obturation
- Speech and swallowing - incompletely restored by obturation in large defects; multidisciplinary support needed
Sources:
- Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery Vol. 3, pp. 543-547 (Prosthodontic Rehabilitation chapter)
- Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery Vol. 2, pp. 979 (HRQoL after maxillectomy)
- K.J. Lee's Essential Otolaryngology, p. 436
- Cummings Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, pp. 1945, 2437