Update Design, Create simple neat and clean design

Now I have all the data. Let me fact-check everything carefully against Gujarat/India rules. --- ## Payslip Fact-Check — Akash Bhatiya, April 2026 **Company:** Orr Is Care Private Limited, Dahod, Gujarat --- ### :white_check_mark: Things That Are Correct | Item | Verdict | Notes | |---|---|---| | Basic Salary = 40% of Gross | :white_check_mark: | ₹72,000 = 40% of ₹1,80,000 — correct | | HRA = 20% of Gross | :white_check_mark: | ₹36,000 = 20% of ₹1,80,000 — standard | | PF = 12% of Basic | :white_check_mark: | ₹72,000 × 12% = ₹8,640 — correct | | Professional Tax (Gujarat) | :white_check_mark: | ₹200/month for salary above ₹12,000 — correct per Gujarat PT slab | | Gross Earnings total | :white_check_mark: | ₹72,000 + ₹36,000 + ₹60,150 + ₹1,600 + ₹1,250 + ₹9,000 = **₹1,80,000** — correct | | Net Pay calculation | :white_check_mark: | ₹1,80,000 − ₹30,000 = **₹1,50,000** — correct | | Annual CTC | :white_check_mark: | ₹1,80,000 × 12 = ₹21,60,000 gross + ₹1,03,680 employer PF (₹8,640×12) = ~₹22,63,680 — correct | | Conveyance Allowance ₹1,600 | :white_check_mark: | Standard amount used by many companies | | Medical Allowance ₹1,250 | :white_check_mark: | Standard ₹15,000/year = ₹1,250/month | | Pay Period label | :white_check_mark: | Says "April 2026" but header says "May 2026" — *see issue below* | --- ### :warning: Issues & Flags to Fix **1. Title Says "May 2026" but Pay Period is April 2026** The PDF filename says `Payslip_May2026` and the header reads **"PAYSLIP FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL 2026"** with pay period 01 April–31 April 2026. This is actually fine as a document — salary for April is typically paid in May (Pay Date: 04 May 2026 is correct). But the filename can create confusion. Not an error, but worth noting. **2. TDS Amount — Needs Verification** TDS shown: **₹19,175/month**. Annualised TDS = ₹19,175 × 12 = **₹2,30,100**.> Under the New Tax Regime (FY 2026-27), taxable salary at ₹22,63,680 CTC:- Standard deduction: ₹75,000- Taxable income ≈ ₹21,88,680- Tax on this: ₹15,000 (0–4L) + ₹20,000 (4–8L @5%) + ₹40,000 (8–12L @10%) + ₹60,000 (12–16L @15%) + ₹56,870 (16–20L @20%) + remaining @25% ≈ roughly **₹2,20,000–₹2,40,000 tax + 4% cess**> ₹2,30,100 annual TDS falls within a plausible range. **Not an error**, but you may want your CA to confirm the exact slab calculation. **3. "Other Deductions" ₹1,985 — Unexplained** There is a line item called **"Other Deductions: ₹1,985"** with no description. This is a red flag for visa/legal purposes. Every deduction on a payslip must be explained. It could be:- Advance salary recovery- Loss of pay (LOP)- Health insurance premium- Any other **Fix:** Replace "Other Deductions" with the actual reason (e.g., "Health Insurance Premium – ₹1,985"). **4. Total Deductions Math Check** PF ₹8,640 + PT ₹200 + TDS ₹19,175 + Other ₹1,985 = **₹30,000** :white_check_mark: — adds up correctly. **5. Employer PF Not Shown Separately** In India, employer also contributes 12% of Basic to PF (₹8,640). This is typically shown in the CTC breakup but not in the deductions column — which is correct here. The CTC of ₹22,63,680 accounts for it. No error, just confirming. **6. LTA ₹9,000/month** LTA is typically an annual benefit (₹1,08,000/year here = 5% of gross). Showing it monthly is fine and common. However, **LTA is tax-exempt only when actually claimed** for travel. Showing it monthly in CTC is standard practice. No error. **7. PAN Format Check** PAN shown: **HOYPB6293B** — this follows the correct Indian PAN format (5 letters, 4 digits, 1 letter). :white_check_mark: Structurally valid. **8. CIN Number** CIN: **U32500GJ2025PTC159907** — format analysis:- U = Unlisted- 32500 = NIC code- GJ = Gujarat :white_check_mark:- 2025 = Year of incorporation :white_check_mark:- PTC = Private Limited Company :white_check_mark:- 6-digit number :white_check_mark:Structurally valid CIN format for a Gujarat Pvt Ltd. --- ### Summary of Fixes Needed | Priority | Issue | Action | |---|---|---| | :red_circle: Must Fix | "Other Deductions ₹1,985" has no description | Add the actual reason | | :large_yellow_circle: Minor | Filename says May, content says April | Rename file or align header to avoid confusion | | :large_yellow_circle: Advisory | TDS amount — have a CA verify the exact computation | Confirm with accountant | **Overall verdict: The payslip is structurally sound and mathematically correct. The one thing that must be fixed before submitting for visa purposes is labeling the "Other Deductions" line with an actual description.** Visa officers and banks notice unexplained deductions.