Here is a detailed interpretation of this ultrasound report for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, 37-year-old male:
Ultrasound Abdomen & Pelvis — Report Interpretation
Organ-by-Organ Findings
| Organ | Finding | Significance |
|---|
| Liver | 15.2 cm, increased echogenicity, no focal lesions; portal vein (PV) & common bile duct (CBD) normal; no biliary dilatation | Abnormal — Grade II fatty infiltration |
| Gallbladder | Distended, no stones/wall thickening/pericholecystic fluid | Normal |
| Pancreas | Head & body normal; tail obscured by bowel gas | Partially visualized — no concerning finding seen |
| Spleen | 9.1 cm, normal echo, no focal lesions | Normal |
| Right Kidney | 10.1 cm, normal, no calculi/hydronephrosis | Normal |
| Left Kidney | 9.8 cm, normal, no calculi/hydronephrosis | Normal |
| Urinary Bladder | Distended, no wall thickening, no calculi | Normal |
| Prostate | Normal size and echotexture | Normal |
| Free fluid | None | Normal |
Key Finding: Grade II Fatty Liver (Moderate Hepatic Steatosis)
This is the only abnormal finding. Fatty liver is graded on ultrasound based on echogenicity (brightness of liver compared to kidney):
| Grade | Sonographic Features | Fat Content (approx.) |
|---|
| Grade I (Mild) | Slightly increased liver echogenicity; diaphragm and vessels still visible | ~5–33% |
| Grade II (Moderate) | Moderately increased echogenicity; slightly obscured portal vein walls and diaphragm | ~33–66% |
| Grade III (Severe) | Markedly increased echogenicity; diaphragm and posterior liver poorly visualized | >66% |
At Grade II, fat makes up roughly one-third to two-thirds of the liver. The hallmark on ultrasound is diffuse increased echogenicity (the liver appears brighter than the kidney), with beginning obscuration of vessel margins. This is consistent with what the radiologist describes as "normal in size and increased echo-texture."
The liver measures 15.2 cm — this is within or at the upper limit of normal (normal sagittal span ~14–17 cm at the midclavicular line), so hepatomegaly is not present here (Yamada's Textbook of Gastroenterology).
What Causes Grade II Fatty Liver?
The most common causes in a 37-year-old male, in order of likelihood:
- Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) — strongly associated with insulin resistance, obesity, metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes
- Alcoholic fatty liver disease — requires clinical history
- Other: medications (steroids, amiodarone), hypothyroidism, hepatitis C
Clinical Implications
- Grade II is a warning stage — actionable but reversible with lifestyle changes
- The absence of focal lesions, normal portal vein, and no biliary dilatation is reassuring — no signs of cirrhosis or portal hypertension at this time
- Recommended next steps:
- Blood tests: Liver function tests (ALT, AST, GGT, ALP, bilirubin), fasting lipid profile, fasting glucose/HbA1c, TSH, Hepatitis B & C serology
- Fibroscan (transient elastography) or FIB-4 score to assess for underlying fibrosis/inflammation (NASH) — ultrasound alone cannot differentiate simple steatosis from steatohepatitis
- BMI and waist circumference assessment
- Lifestyle modification: Weight loss of 5–10% body weight significantly reduces hepatic fat; Mediterranean diet, alcohol avoidance, aerobic exercise (150–300 min/week)
- Follow-up ultrasound in 6–12 months to assess response
- No specific drug treatment is indicated at this stage unless metabolic co-morbidities (diabetes, dyslipidemia) are present
Summary
The scan is otherwise entirely normal. The only concern is moderate (Grade II) fatty liver, which is common in adults his age and is typically driven by metabolic factors. It is not an emergency, but warrants a metabolic workup and dedicated lifestyle intervention to prevent progression to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis, or cirrhosis.