Difficult airway algorithm

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching Images

difficult airway algorithm ASA flowchart

Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Loading Image
Loading Image
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
I now have comprehensive material to provide an excellent, well-illustrated answer. Here is the complete difficult airway algorithm:

Difficult Airway Algorithm

Definition

The ASA (2022) defines a difficult airway as "the clinical situation in which anticipated or unanticipated difficulty or failure is experienced by a physician trained in anesthesia care, including one or more of the following: face mask ventilation, laryngoscopy, ventilation using a supraglottic airway, tracheal intubation, extubation, or invasive airway access."

Step 1 — Pre-procedure Assessment

Assess the likelihood and clinical impact of:
ProblemAssessment Tools
Difficult mask ventilationMOANS mnemonic
Difficult supraglottic airway placementRODS mnemonic
Difficult laryngoscopy / intubationLEMON, SMART assessment
Difficult surgical airway accessSHORT mnemonic
Patient cooperation / consentClinical judgment
Key decisions to make before proceeding:
  1. Awake intubation vs. intubation after induction of general anesthesia
  2. Non-invasive vs. invasive initial approach
  3. Video-assisted laryngoscopy as the initial approach
  4. Preservation vs. ablation of spontaneous ventilation

ASA Difficult Airway Algorithm (2022)

ASA Difficult Airway Algorithm
The algorithm has three structural arms:

Arm 1 — Predicted Difficult Airway → Awake Intubation

  • Airway approached by noninvasive intubation (fiberoptic, video laryngoscopy)
  • If fails → Cancel case or consider other options or invasive airway access
  • Invasive airway access (a) is always an option

Arm 2 — Intubation After Induction (Non-emergency Pathway)

Used when mask ventilation is adequate but intubation fails.
  1. Call for help; consider returning to spontaneous ventilation; consider awakening the patient
  2. Alternative approaches to intubation (see note c below)
  3. If multiple attempts fail → Invasive airway access OR consider other options OR awaken patient
If face mask AND SGA ventilation both become inadequate → cross to Emergency Pathway

Arm 3 — Emergency Pathway (CICV)

"Can't Intubate, Can't Ventilate" (CICV/CICO)
  1. Face mask ventilation NOT adequate → Attempt SGA
  2. SGA adequate → "Stop and Think" (nonemergency pathway)
  3. SGA NOT adequate → Emergency pathway: call for help → Emergency noninvasive airway ventilation (SGA attempt) → If fails → Emergency invasive airway access

DAS Algorithm 2015 — Unanticipated Difficult Intubation in Adults

DAS Difficult Airway Algorithm 2015
The DAS algorithm uses four sequential Plans:
PlanFocusMax Attempts
Plan AFacemask ventilation + tracheal intubation3+1 (direct/video laryngoscopy)
Plan BSAD (supraglottic airway device) insertion3 attempts, prefer 2nd-generation
Plan CFacemask ventilation rescue2-person technique + adjuncts
Plan DFront-of-neck access (FONA) — scalpel cricothyrotomyDefinitive
Plan A details: optimize head/neck position, preoxygenate, adequate NMB, bougie, external laryngeal manipulation, remove cricoid pressure, maintain oxygenation.
Plan B success → "Stop and Think": wake up / intubate via SAD / proceed without intubating / tracheostomy.
Plan C success → Wake the patient.
Plan D (CICO declared)Scalpel cricothyrotomy (preferred over needle techniques in adults):
  • Palpable CTM: transverse stab incision → turn blade 90° → bougie via blade → railroad 6-mm cuffed tube → confirm with capnography
  • Impalpable CTM: 8–10 cm vertical skin incision → blunt dissection → identify larynx → proceed as above

Algorithm Notes (Footnotes)

NoteContent
(a) Other optionsSurgery under face mask/SGA anesthesia, regional/local anesthesia — limited value once emergency pathway reached
(b) Invasive airwaySurgical or percutaneous cricothyrotomy, tracheostomy, jet ventilation, retrograde intubation
(c) Alternative intubationVideolaryngoscopy, alternate blades, SGA as intubation conduit (±fiberoptic), fiberoptic intubation, intubating stylet/tube changer, light wand, blind oral/nasal
(d) Re-prepareConsider re-preparation for awake intubation or case cancellation
(e) Emergency noninvasiveSGA (preferred), rigid bronchoscope, transtracheal jet ventilation

Oxygen Delivery — Continuously Throughout

  • Preoxygenation with 100% O₂ (8 breaths of VC or 3–5 min tidal breathing)
  • Apneic oxygenation (high-flow nasal O₂ at 15 L/min) to extend safe apnea time
  • Confirm ventilation/intubation/SGA placement with exhaled CO₂ at every step

Emergency Department Context (Rosen's)

The ED algorithm (Walls Manual) adds the "Forced to Act" scenario: RSI may be justified even with a predicted difficult airway when:
  • Patient is rapidly deteriorating (anaphylaxis with angioedema, severe status asthmaticus, premature extubation)
  • Impending arrest or complete obstruction within seconds to minutes
  • No time for awake intubation preparation
In this scenario, optimize all other factors: use videolaryngoscopy, achieve maximal preoxygenation, cardiovascular optimization before induction. — Rosen's Emergency Medicine, p. 1.9

Other International Algorithms

OrganizationKey Features
DAS (UK, 2015)Plans A–D; scalpel cricothyrotomy as FONA standard
CAFG (Canada)Emphasizes awake technique for anticipated difficulty
SFAR (France)Similar stepwise approach
NAP4 dataHuman factors contribute to adverse outcomes in >40% of cases
All guidelines share these principles:
  • Do not repeat the same failed technique
  • Awake intubation for the anticipated difficult airway
  • SGA as rescue for difficult mask ventilation
  • Emergency invasive access (FONA) for CICO
  • Limit intubation attempts (typically ≤3 + 1 by a senior colleague)

Post-incident Follow-up

After any difficult airway event:
  • Document clearly in the medical record
  • Complete an airway alert form
  • Explain to the patient in person and in writing
  • Send written report to the primary care provider and local database
  • Urgent review of any cricothyrotomy site

Sources: Morgan and Mikhail's Clinical Anesthesiology, 7e, pp. 608–611 | Miller's Anesthesia, 10e, pp. 5824–5830 | Sabiston Textbook of Surgery | Rosen's Emergency Medicine | DAS Guidelines 2015 (Frerk et al., Br J Anaesth 2015)

Which is the most recent DAS guidelines

Checking Date & Time
Searching the Web

Difficult Airway Society DAS guidelines most recent update 2024 2025

Searching PubMed

Difficult Airway Society guidelines

Searching the Web

DAS 2025 guidelines unanticipated difficult tracheal intubation adults key changes British Journal Anaesthesia

Searching PubMed

"difficult airway society" AND "unanticipated difficult" AND intubation

Reading Article
Searching the Web

DAS 2025 guidelines key changes from 2015 Plan A B C D videolaryngoscopy eFONA summary

Searching the Web

site:trucorp.com OR site:nysora.com DAS 2025 guidelines Plan A videolaryngoscopy HFNO physiologically difficult airway eFONA recommendations

Searching the Web

DAS 2025 intubation guidelines 65 recommendations "physiologically difficult" obesity HFNO eFONA scalpel details

The most recent DAS guidelines are the 2025 edition, published in the British Journal of Anaesthesia (Vol. 136, Issue 1, January 2026) — open access article on ScienceDirect [PMID: 41203471]. They supersede the widely-used 2015 guidelines.

DAS 2025 Guidelines — Summary

Full title: "Difficult Airway Society 2025 Guidelines for Management of Unanticipated Difficult Tracheal Intubation in Adults" Authors: Ahmad I, El-Boghdadly K, Iliff H, et al. Process: Systematic review of 1,241 papers + 3-round Delphi consensus + 65 meetings over 3 years → 65 recommendations

What's Retained from 2015

The linear four-plan structure is maintained:
PlanFocus
ATracheal intubation (optimised)
BSupraglottic airway device (SAD) ventilation
CFacemask ventilation rescue
DEmergency front-of-neck airway (eFONA)

Key Changes / New Emphases in 2025

1. Shift in Philosophy — "Maximise Success, Not Just Manage Failure"

The 2015 guidelines focused on what to do when things go wrong. The 2025 update prioritises maximising first-pass intubation success from the outset.

2. Plan A — Videolaryngoscopy as the Default

  • Videolaryngoscopy (VL) is now integrated early in Plan A, not just as an alternative — reflecting strong evidence that it improves glottic view and reduces failed intubation rates vs. direct laryngoscopy.
  • Emphasis on: optimised patient positioning, adequate neuromuscular blockade, bougie use, and skilled VL technique.

3. Continuous Oxygenation / "Peroxygenation"

  • High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) now explicitly recommended throughout airway management to extend safe apnoea time.
  • Term "peroxygenation" used to describe oxygen delivery throughout the procedure (pre-, during, and post-attempt), not just pre-oxygenation.

4. The Physiologically Difficult Airway — New Dedicated Section

  • Explicit recognition that physiological derangement (haemodynamic instability, severe hypoxaemia, metabolic acidosis, right heart failure) increases airway risk as much as anatomical difficulty.
  • Specific guidance on how to optimise physiology before intubation in these patients.
  • Awake tracheal intubation (ATI) is a priority in the physiologically compromised patient.

5. Obesity — Specific Recommendations

  • Obesity elevated from a footnote to a distinct clinical phenotype with dedicated guidance.
  • Early use of a second-generation SAD (better seal, intubation conduit option).
  • ATI considered a physiological priority in complex obese patients.

6. Plan D — eFONA (Emergency Front-of-Neck Airway)

  • Scalpel cricothyrotomy remains the preferred technique (over needle/cannula) for adults.
  • Updated technical details: scalpel held in dominant hand, incisions made away from non-dominant hand.
  • The vertical eFONA technique is largely unchanged from 2015; alternative scalpel–bougie–tube techniques also acceptable.
  • Acknowledges ongoing debate around impalpable cricothyroid membrane management.

7. New Topic Areas (Not in 2015)

New AreaKey Points
Rapid Sequence Induction (RSI)Dedicated recommendations for RSII
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)For pre-procedural airway assessment and CTM identification
Human factorsExplicit recommendations on cognitive load, team communication, CRM
DocumentationStandardised documentation requirements post-event
Education & trainingStructured, simulation-based, multidisciplinary airway training
Post-intubation careHandover, waveform capnography, monitoring requirements

8. Waveform Capnography — Mandatory at Every Step

Confirmation of tube/SAD placement must use waveform capnography (not just colorimetric CO₂ detection).

9. Team-Based Approach Formalised

  • Pre-procedure team briefing mandatory.
  • Airway strategy must be communicated with the anaesthetic assistant.
  • History of previous difficulty must guide planning.

Other Current DAS Guidelines (Full Suite)

The 2025 intubation guidelines are one of several current DAS documents:
GuidelineYear
Unanticipated difficult tracheal intubation in adults2025
Awake tracheal intubation (ATI)2020
Extubation guidelines2012 (under review)
VideolaryngoscopySeparate guidance
Obstetric airwaySeparate guidance
Paediatric airwaySeparate guidance
All current guidelines are available at das.uk.com/guidelines.

Bottom line: The DAS 2025 guidelines are the current standard, published in Br J Anaesth 2026;136:283–307 [PMID 41203471]. They retain the Plan A–D framework but significantly modernise it — with VL as the default, HFNO throughout, dedicated sections on physiological difficulty and obesity, POCUS, and a stronger human factors emphasis.

Extubation criteria

Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
I now have comprehensive material for a thorough answer. Here it is:

Extubation Criteria

Extubation should never be treated as a benign procedure — it carries its own set of potential complications including laryngospasm, aspiration, airway obstruction, and cardiovascular stress. Planning is mandatory before, during, and after extubation.

The Two Core Questions

Before extubating any patient, answer both:
  1. Can the patient maintain a patent upper airway and protect it?
  2. Can the patient sustain adequate oxygenation and ventilation independently?
Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, p. 939

I. Criteria for Extubation — Post-operative / Routine Anesthesia

Neurological / Level of Consciousness

CriterionDetail
Follows commandsOpens eyes, squeezes hand on request
Purposeful movementSpontaneous or to stimulation
Airway protective reflexesIntact cough and gag
Pain adequately controlledPrevents splinting/agitation post-extubation
Non-combativeAble to cooperate with positioning

Respiratory

CriterionDetail
Spontaneous ventilationAdequate rate and depth
Tidal volume> 5 mL/kg
Respiratory rate< 25 breaths/min
Negative inspiratory force (NIF)More negative than −20 cmH₂O
Vital capacity> 10 mL/kg
Minute ventilation< 10 L/min
FiO₂ requirement< 0.50 to maintain adequate SpO₂
Neuromuscular blockadeFully reversed (TOF ratio ≥ 0.9)

Haemodynamic / Systemic

CriterionDetail
Haemodynamic stabilityNo active vasopressor dependence for extubation
Adequately resuscitatedNo ongoing haemorrhage, fluid deficit corrected
NormothermicShivering impairs gas exchange and increases O₂ demand
No signs of sepsisOngoing sepsis impairs respiratory reserve
Low likelihood of urgent return to OREnsures airway won't need to be re-secured imminently
Miller's Anesthesia, 10e (Box 62.11, Trauma Extubation Criteria); Barash Clinical Anesthesia, 9e

II. ICU Extubation — Weaning & Liberation Protocol

In mechanically ventilated ICU patients, extubation follows a two-step screening → trial process.

Step 1 — Daily Screening (Pass all of the following)

Screening CriterionThreshold
PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio> 200
PEEP≤ 5 cmH₂O
FiO₂≤ 0.40–0.50
Cough and airway reflexesIntact
No continuous vasopressor infusionOr weaning
Minimal/no sedationOr pass SAT (Spontaneous Awake Trial)
Cause of respiratory failureResolving or resolved

Step 2 — Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT)

The SBT is the single best predictor of successful extubation.
Method: Place patient on minimal ventilator support for 30–120 minutes:
  • PSV 5–8 cmH₂O + PEEP 5 cmH₂O, or
  • T-piece (CPAP 5 cmH₂O), or
  • Pressure support 7 cmH₂O / PEEP 5 cmH₂O
Note: Any level of pressure support underestimates the resistance a patient will encounter after extubation, because post-extubation supraglottic work is approximately equal to endotracheal tube resistance. For borderline patients, a brief T-piece trial with zero support is more stringent. — Fishman's Pulmonary Diseases, p. 2617
SBT FAILS if any of the following occur:
Failure Criterion
RR > 35/min for > 5 minutes
SpO₂ < 90%
HR > 140/min or ≥ 20% change from baseline
SBP < 90 mmHg or > 180 mmHg
Increased agitation, anxiety, or diaphoresis
If the SBT is passed, proceed to extubation assessment.

Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI)

  • RSBI = RR (breaths/min) ÷ Tidal Volume (litres)
  • RSBI < 105 is classically used as a predictor of successful extubation
  • Caution: recent meta-analyses show only moderate sensitivity and poor specificity — do not use in isolation — Sabiston Textbook of Surgery

Other Respiratory Mechanics (ancillary)

ParameterTarget
NIF (MIP)More negative than −20 cmH₂O
Tidal Volume> 5 mL/kg
Vital Capacity> 10 mL/kg
Minute Ventilation< 10 L/min
SBT oxygenationPaO₂ > 80 mmHg on FiO₂ 0.4 + CPAP 5 cmH₂O
Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 22e; Goldman-Cecil Medicine; Sabiston Textbook of Surgery

III. Cuff Leak Test

Performed to assess for laryngeal/subglottic oedema before extubation — especially after prolonged intubation, head/neck surgery, trauma, or prone positioning.
  • Deflate ETT cuff → measure volume/audible leak on ventilation
  • Expected leak: 10–20% of ventilated tidal volume
  • No cuff leak → suggests airway oedema → risk of post-extubation stridor/obstruction
  • Management if no leak: IV dexamethasone (e.g. 0.1–0.2 mg/kg), reassess in 24 hours
  • A persistent absent cuff leak over multiple days is not an absolute contraindication — extubation can proceed with preparations for reintubation in place

IV. Awake vs Deep Extubation

FeatureAwake ExtubationDeep Extubation
Airway reflexesIntactSuppressed
Coughing/strainingMore likelyMinimised
ICP/IOP/BP responseIncreasedReduced
Laryngospasm riskLower (reflexes intact)Higher (intermediate depth)
Aspiration riskLowerHigher
Preferred inDifficult airway, full stomach, OSA, neurosurgery, thoracic surgeryAirway surgery where coughing risks haemostasis or bronchospasm
Contraindications to deepCopious secretions, difficult airway, OSA, high aspiration risk, inadequately trained PACU staff
Avoid extubating during Stage 2 anaesthesia (excitatory phase) — highest risk of laryngospasm, breath-holding, and obstruction.

V. DAS Extubation Guidelines (2012, under revision)

The DAS Extubation Guidelines stratify patients into:
CategoryDescription
Low riskNormal airway, no complicating factors
At-riskDifficult intubation history, airway surgery, obesity, aspiration risk, obstructive pathology, reduced conscious level
Recommended approach for at-risk extubation:
  1. Optimise the patient before extubation
  2. Formulate a plan for failure (airway exchange catheter, senior backup present)
  3. Perform extubation in a controlled, senior-supervised environment
  4. Have a post-extubation management plan ready

VI. Post-Extubation Management

InterventionIndication
High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO)Prevention of post-extubation failure in low-risk; after prolonged ventilation
NIV / BiPAP immediately post-extubationHigh-risk patients: age > 65, COPD, cardiac disease, chronic hypercapnia, >24h intubation — start before ARF develops
NIV for rescueOnce post-extubation ARF develops, evidence is weak — may delay reintubation and worsen mortality (Esteban trial)
Prompt reintubationIf any doubt — do not delay with failed NIV rescue
10–20% of patients who pass an SBT fail extubation. Mortality among reintubated patients is >6 times higher than those who tolerate extubation — likely reflecting underlying severity of illness, not the reintubation itself. — Fishman's Pulmonary Diseases

VII. Failure to Wean — Causes to Exclude

If unable to liberate from ventilation after 48–72 hours of resolved underlying disease:
  • Residual neuromuscular blockade
  • Critical illness myopathy/polyneuropathy
  • Acid-base disturbance (metabolic alkalosis → blunted drive; non-AG acidosis → compensatory tachypnoea)
  • Delirium, anxiety, PTSD
  • Unresolved sepsis or infection
  • Nutritional depletion (diaphragm weakness)
  • Small ETT (increased resistance)

Sources: Barash Clinical Anesthesia, 9e | Miller's Anesthesia, 10e | Sabiston Textbook of Surgery | Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 22e | Goldman-Cecil Medicine | Fishman's Pulmonary Diseases | Washington Manual of Medical Therapeutics

I want the extubation criteria solely from Millers

Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Here is the extubation content directly from Miller's Anesthesia, 10e:

Extubation — Miller's Anesthesia, 10e

General Preparations for Extubation

Before attempting extubation, ensure all of the following:
  • Adequate reversal or recovery from neuromuscular blockade
  • Haemodynamic stability
  • Normothermia
  • Adequate analgesia
  • Preoxygenate with 100% FiO₂
  • Consider alveolar recruitment manoeuvres
  • Suction the pharynx (and trachea if indicated)
  • Remove throat packs
  • Place a bite block (rolled gauze between molars — not an OPA)
  • Inspect pilot balloon to confirm complete cuff deflation before removal (inflated cuff can cause vocal cord injury or arytenoid dislocation)
  • If high-pressure mask ventilation was used → pass orogastric tube and suction to reduce aspiration risk

Box 62.11 — Criteria for OR or PACU Extubation of the Trauma Patient

Mental Status

  • Resolution of intoxication
  • Able to follow commands
  • Non-combative
  • Pain adequately controlled

Airway Anatomy and Reflexes

  • Appropriate cough and gag
  • Ability to protect airway from aspiration
  • No excessive airway oedema or instability

Respiratory Mechanics

  • Adequate tidal volume and respiratory rate
  • Normal motor strength
  • Required FiO₂ < 0.50

Systemic Stability

  • Adequately resuscitated
  • Small likelihood of urgent return to OR
  • Normothermic, without signs of sepsis

Complications Associated with Extubation (Box 40.5)

  • Laryngospasm and bronchospasm
  • Upper airway obstruction
  • Hypoventilation
  • Respiratory drive failure (residual anaesthetic, decreased CO₂/O₂ response)
  • Hypoxia (atelectasis)
  • Vocal fold obstruction (laryngospasm, oedema, paralysis)
  • Tracheal obstruction (subglottic oedema, tracheomalacia)
  • Aspiration
  • Hypertension, tachycardia
  • Increased ICP / IOP / pulmonary artery pressure
  • Increased bronchial stump pressure (post-pulmonary resection)

Awake vs Deep Extubation

AwakeDeep
Airway reflexesIntact — better airway maintenanceSuppressed
Coughing/haemodynamic responsePresentAvoided
RiskLaryngospasm on ETT removalUpper airway obstruction, hypoventilation
  • Stage II anaesthesia (excitatory phase) must be avoided — highest risk of laryngospasm
  • The Bailey manoeuvre (exchange ETT for SGA under deep anaesthesia) is an alternative

Position for extubation:

  • Sniffing position — standard; optimal for airway rescue if needed
  • Head-up — preferred in morbid obesity and high aspiration risk
  • Lateral decubitus — when aspiration risk is high

Extubation of the Difficult Airway (Box 40.6)

Factors Associated with Increased Extubation Risk:
Airway Risk Factors:
  • Known difficult airway
  • Airway deterioration (bleeding, oedema, trauma)
  • Restricted airway access
  • Obesity and obstructive sleep apnoea
  • Aspiration risk
General Risk Factors:
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Respiratory disease
Management of difficult extubation:
  • Preferred technique: Airway Exchange Catheter (AEC)
    • Placed through ETT before extubation, kept in situ until reintubation risk has passed
    • Can connect to capnograph for respiratory monitoring
    • Oxygen insufflation is possible but carries significant barotrauma risk — if used in emergency, limit to 2 L/min as a temporising measure only
    • Smaller AECs (11 Fr) are well-tolerated by awake patients — secure with tape, label clearly
  • Extubation plan must always include a reintubation strategy formulated in advance

"Although considerable emphasis is placed on the problems that can arise during induction and intubation, the risk of complications can potentially be higher during extubation of the trachea." — Miller's Anesthesia, 10e, p. 5962
Miller's Anesthesia, 2-Volume Set, 10e, pp. 5962–5968 (Ch. 40) & p. 9483–9484 (Box 62.11)

Please include what commands he should be following

Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Miller's Anesthesia does not provide a specific named list of "commands to follow before extubation" in one place — rather it distributes this across neuromuscular blockade and emergence chapters. Here is what it explicitly states, consolidated:

Commands & Clinical Tests for Extubation Readiness — Miller's Anesthesia, 10e

The criterion "able to follow commands" is assessed through the following specific clinical manoeuvres described in Miller's:

Commands / Clinical Tests (in an Awake Patient)

TestWhat to Ask/DoSignificance per Miller's
Open eyes widely"Open your eyes"Possible at TOF ~0.6, but NMB still significant
Stick out your tongue"Stick out your tongue"Possible at TOF ~0.6
Lift legs off the bed"Lift your legs"General motor strength assessment
5-second head lift"Lift your head off the pillow and hold it"Historically the gold standard — correlates with TOF ~0.60; insensitive — should NOT be used alone
Grip strength"Squeeze my fingers"Still ~60% of normal at TOF 0.70–0.75 — unreliable in isolation
Bite against a tongue depressorOppose incisor teeth against depressorMost reliable clinical indicator of pharyngeal muscle tone; correlates with TOF ratio ~0.85 — preferred over head lift

Important Caveats from Miller's

  • None of these tests alone are sufficient to confirm adequate NMB reversal. Objective quantitative TOF monitoring is required:
    • TOF ratio ≥ 0.9 (MMG/EMG) or ≥ 1.0 (AMG) to exclude residual block
  • The 5-second head lift, despite being the "gold standard," is remarkably insensitive — patients can perform it at a TOF ratio as low as 0.60, at which point pharyngeal and upper oesophageal function remains impaired
  • Opposing incisor teeth against a tongue depressor correlates with a TOF ~0.85 and is a more reliable indicator of airway-protective muscle tone than the head lift
  • At TOF ≤ 0.4: patient is unable to lift the head or arm at all
  • At TOF ~0.6: patient can open eyes, stick out tongue, and lift head for 3 seconds — but vital capacity and inspiratory force are still reduced
  • At TOF 0.7–0.75: can cough and sustain head lift for 5 seconds, but grip strength still ~60% of normal
  • At TOF ≥ 0.8: vital capacity and inspiratory force return to normal — but diplopia, blurred vision, and facial weakness may persist

"The ability to strongly oppose the incisor teeth against a tongue depressor is a more reliable indicator of pharyngeal muscle tone... correlating with an average TOF ratio of 0.85 as opposed to 0.60 for the sustained head lift." — Miller's Anesthesia, 10e, p. 11569
Miller's Anesthesia, 2-Volume Set, 10e, pp. 5781–5783 (Ch. 39) & pp. 11568–11569 (Ch. 76)
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.