Recent trials in pancreatic cancers

Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"Pancreatic Neoplasms"[MeSH Terms] AND "Clinical Trial"[Publication Type]

Searching PubMed

"Pancreatic Neoplasms"[MeSH Terms] AND "immunotherapy"

Searching PubMed

"Pancreatic Neoplasms"[MeSH Terms] AND "Systematic Review"[Publication Type]

Searching the Web

recent phase 3 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma trials 2024 2025 2026 results

Searching PubMed

"pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma" AND "Phase III"

Reading Article

PMID: 41915391

Reading Article

PMID: 39106081

Reading Article

PMID: 38040420

Reading Web Page

https://www.esmo.org/oncology-news/daraxonrasib-prolongs-sur…

Reading Article

PMID: 41187298

Reading Article

PMID: 38232341

Reading Article

PMID: 37708904

Reading Article

PMID: 37903909

Reading Article

PMID: 39540844

Recent trials in pancreatic cancer

Most recent advances are in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Outcomes differ markedly by stage, so the trials are grouped accordingly.

1. Metastatic PDAC - established first-line advance

  • NAPOLI-3, Phase III, 2023: first-line NALIRIFOX (liposomal irinotecan, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, 5-FU) versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in 770 untreated patients with metastatic PDAC.
    • Median overall survival: 11.1 vs 9.2 months
    • HR for death: 0.83
    • Grade 3+ adverse events: 87% vs 86%
      This supports NALIRIFOX as a first-line option for patients with good performance status, alongside established FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Wainberg et al., Lancet, 2023, PMID: 37708904

2. Second-line metastatic PDAC - mostly negative Phase III results

  • TRYBECA-1, Phase III, 2025: eryaspase plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone after progression on first-line therapy, n=512.
    • Overall survival: 7.5 vs 6.7 months, HR 0.92, p=0.374
    • No significant improvement in progression-free survival or response rate.
    • Conclusion: does not support further eryaspase development in PDAC.
      Hammel et al., JCO, 2025, PMID: 41187298
  • GEMPAX, Phase III, 2024: gemcitabine plus paclitaxel versus gemcitabine after prior FOLFIRINOX in metastatic PDAC, n=211.
    • Overall survival: 6.4 vs 5.9 months, not significant
    • PFS: 3.1 vs 2.0 months, significant
    • Response: 17.1% vs 4.2%
      The regimen did not meet its survival endpoint and had substantially more grade 3+ toxicity, including thrombocytopenia and neuropathy. De La Fouchardière et al., JCO, 2024, PMID: 38232341
  • RASolute 302, Phase III, reported 2026: daraxonrasib, an oral RAS(ON) multiselective inhibitor, was reported to improve overall and progression-free survival over investigator-choice chemotherapy in previously treated metastatic PDAC. This is a potentially important targeted-therapy result, particularly because most PDACs contain RAS pathway mutations. Full peer-reviewed numerical results and regulatory status should be checked before applying it clinically. ESMO report

3. Biomarker-selected and precision approaches

  • GV1001 plus gemcitabine/capecitabine, Phase III, 2024: in a selected group with high serum eotaxin, the telomerase peptide vaccine GV1001 improved median overall survival: 11.3 vs 7.5 months and time to progression: 7.3 vs 4.5 months. This was a 148-patient biomarker-selected study and needs external confirmation before becoming standard care. The paper also has a published erratum. Jo et al., British Journal of Cancer, 2024, PMID: 37903909
  • AVATAR, Phase III, 2025: whole-exome sequencing plus patient-derived organoids/mouse avatars to direct therapy versus conventional care in advanced PDAC.
    • Median OS: 8.6 vs 8.7 months, no intention-to-treat benefit.
    • The logistical problem was major: only 4 of 39 patients receiving second-line treatment in the experimental arm actually received a matched personalized treatment.
      This shows that precision oncology can be useful for a minority, but the turnaround time is often incompatible with rapidly progressive PDAC. Sarno et al., Clinical Cancer Research, 2025, PMID: 39540844

4. Immunotherapy combinations - no broad breakthrough yet

PDAC is generally resistant to checkpoint blockade because of its fibrotic and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.
  • Oleclumab plus durvalumab plus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, randomized Phase Ib/II, 2024: targeting CD73 and PD-L1 did not meet the primary response endpoint in unselected metastatic PDAC. Response was 32.9% with the triplet versus 29.0% with chemotherapy; OS HR was 0.75 but the confidence interval crossed 1. A high-CD73 subgroup signal was exploratory only. Coveler et al., Clinical Cancer Research, 2024, PMID: 39106081
  • Pembrolizumab plus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, randomized Phase II, 2023: in resectable or borderline-resectable PDAC, addition of pembrolizumab was feasible but did not convincingly increase intratumoral CD8+ T cells. Median OS was 27.8 versus 24.3 months, but the small trial was not designed to establish a survival benefit. Katz et al., JITC, 2023, PMID: 38040420
Clinical implication: immunotherapy is not routine for unselected PDAC. It remains relevant for rare actionable settings, such as MSI-high/dMMR tumors, and in clinical trials.

5. Locally advanced PDAC - local ablation did not improve survival

  • PELICAN, randomized trial, 2026: radiofrequency ablation plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone after disease control on induction chemotherapy in unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer, n=188.
    • Overall survival from randomization: 12.1 vs 11.6 months, HR 1.07
    • More serious grade 3+ adverse events: 27% vs 11%
    • Worse quality-of-life trajectory with radiofrequency ablation.
      Therefore, RFA should not be added routinely to chemotherapy in this setting. Seelen et al., JAMA Network Open, 2026, PMID: 41915391

Practical summary

SettingRecent signalCurrent interpretation
First-line metastaticNALIRIFOX improved OS vs gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxelValid regimen for fit patients
Second-line metastaticEryaspase and GEMPAX did not improve OSNo new broadly practice-changing option
RAS-mutant previously treated diseaseDaraxonrasib Phase III reported positivePromising, verify publication and approval status
Biomarker selectionGV1001 benefit in eotaxin-high subgroupInteresting but needs validation
ImmunotherapySeveral combinations negative or inconclusive in unselected PDACTrial-based, except rare biomarker-defined indications
Locally advanced diseaseRFA plus chemotherapy negative and more toxicDo not use routinely
Personalized modelsAVATAR negative overall due to feasibility delaysMolecular profiling still matters, but rapid turnaround is essential
For context, pancreatic cancer textbooks still emphasize surgery plus systemic therapy as the only potentially curative approach for localized disease, with neoadjuvant treatment increasingly used for borderline-resectable disease. Goldman-Cecil Medicine, p. 2470.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.