Role of immunotherapy in ca vulva. Give detailed overview from latest medical journal and evidence. Make flowcharts and tables.

Reading File
Now let me run parallel searches across the medical library and PubMed simultaneously.
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

vulvar cancer immunotherapy PD-1 PD-L1

Searching the Web

immunotherapy vulvar carcinoma 2024 2025 clinical trials checkpoint inhibitors pembrolizumab

Excellent data found. Now let me extract full content from the PMC systematic review and get more PubMed details in parallel.
Reading Web Page

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12294087

Searching PubMed

vulvar squamous cell carcinoma immunotherapy checkpoint inhibitor

Reading Article

PMID: 40282436

Now let me get the full details on the key clinical trials and scoping review.
Reading Article

PMID: 40723274

Reading Article

PMID: 39561273

Reading Article

PMID: 40068805

Reading Article

PMID: 40588522

Excellent - I now have comprehensive data. Let me also get the PD-L1 gynecological cancer review and search library for additional tumor microenvironment content.
Reading Article

PMID: 38295614

Finding Sources
I now have comprehensive data from the latest systematic review (2025), multiple phase II trials, and library content. Let me now compile the full detailed overview.Here is the comprehensive, evidence-based overview:

Immunotherapy in Carcinoma of the Vulva: A Comprehensive Overview


1. Background and Disease Context

Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) accounts for ~90% of all vulvar malignancies and represents ~5% of female genital tract cancers. Two distinct etiological pathways exist:
  • HPV-associated pathway (~30-40%): Driven by HPV 16/18 oncoproteins E5, E6, E7 - typically in younger women, arising from usual-type VIN
  • HPV-independent pathway (~60-70%): Associated with lichen sclerosus and differentiated VIN - older women, worse prognosis
In advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease, options are limited. Standard chemotherapy (platinum-based regimens adapted from cervical cancer) yields poor outcomes, creating a significant unmet need for novel agents. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as the primary immunotherapeutic strategy.

2. Immunological Rationale for ICIs in VSCC

2.1 Tumor Microenvironment (TME)

The TME in VSCC is characterized by a complex interplay of immune evasion mechanisms:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              VSCC TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT                        │
├───────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│   PRO-IMMUNE SIGNALS  │     IMMUNE EVASION MECHANISMS           │
├───────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ • CD8+ TIL infiltrate │ • PD-L1 overexpression (in ~40% VSCC)   │
│ • HPV-specific T cells│ • IDO (indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase)      │
│ • NK cell activity    │   production → tryptophan depletion      │
│ • MHC-I expression    │ • TGF-β signaling → T-cell suppression   │
│   (HPV+ tumors)       │ • CTLA-4 upregulation on Tregs           │
│                       │ • LAG-3 / Galectin-3 axis                │
│                       │ • MHC-I downregulation (HPV-neg tumors)  │
└───────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────────┘

2.2 Key Biomarker Landscape

BiomarkerPrevalence in VSCCClinical Significance
PD-L1 (CPS ≥1)~30-40%FDA-approved criterion for pembrolizumab; paradoxically correlates with worse prognosis but may predict ICI benefit
MSI-H / dMMRRare (<5%)Agnostic FDA approval for pembrolizumab
TMB-High (≥10 mut/Mb)~10-15%Agnostic FDA approval for pembrolizumab
HPV positivity30-40%Associated with better ICI response; more inflamed TME
EGFR overexpression~60-80%Potential target for combination strategies
NTRK fusionRareLarotrectinib/entrectinib eligible
LAG-3Present in VIN/VSCCEmerging target; correlates with immune suppression

3. Approved Immunotherapeutic Agents

3.1 Regulatory Approvals Summary

AgentClassIndication in VSCCApproval
Pembrolizumab (Keytruda)Anti-PD-1PD-L1+ (CPS≥1), MSI-H, or TMB-H recurrent/metastatic VSCC after prior chemoFDA-approved (biomarker-driven)
Nivolumab (Opdivo)Anti-PD-1HPV-related VSCC (NCCN: useful in certain circumstances)NCCN category 2B
Pembrolizumab + Chemo ± BevacizumabCombinationRecurrent/metastatic VSCC (1st line)NCCN preferred regimen
LarotrectinibTRK inhibitorNTRK fusion-positive VSCCFDA agnostic approval
EntrectinibTRK inhibitorNTRK fusion-positive VSCCFDA agnostic approval
Note: The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has NOT yet approved ICIs specifically for VSCC as of 2025, highlighting ongoing unmet need.

4. Key Clinical Trials

4.1 Trial Results Summary Table

TrialPhaseAgent(s)N (VSCC)ORRmPFSmOSKey Notes
KEYNOTE-028IbPembrolizumab monotherapy2 (PD-L1+)~50% (1 PR/2 pts)NRNREarly signal; PD-L1+ selection
KEYNOTE-158IIPembrolizumab monotherapy10110.9%2.1 mo6.2 moLow ORR but durable responses in responders
CheckMate 358I/IINivolumab monotherapy520% (1 PR)NRNR3/5 stable disease; 2 HPV+, 3 HPV-
SWOG S1609 (DART)IIIpilimumab + Nivolumab1618.8%2.2 mo7.6 moCBR 25%; 3 durable responses >1 year
PEVOsqIIPembrolizumab + Vorinostat (HDAC-i)21 (vulvar/vaginal)19%4.0 mo17.5 moBest OS signal; HDAC inhibition as immunotherapy enhancer
Yeku et al.IIPembrolizumab + CRT (IMRT)975% (locally advanced)NRNRNeoadjuvant/concurrent use; highest ORR
Sources: Maiorano et al. Cancers 2025 [PMID: 40723274]; Arenhardt et al. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2025 [PMID: 40068805]; Chae et al. Clin Cancer Res 2025 [PMID: 39561273]; Borcoman et al. Nat Cancer 2025 [PMID: 40588522]

4.2 Meta-Analysis Pooled Outcomes (Maiorano et al., Cancers 2025)

Based on 6 trials, 181 patients:
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│         META-ANALYSIS RESULTS (2025, N=181 patients)       │
├─────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Pooled ORR          │ 21% (all regimens)                   │
│ Monotherapy ORR     │ 11% (95% CI: 6-18%)                  │
│ Combination ORR     │ 46% (p not significant vs mono)      │
│ Median PFS          │ 2.2 months                           │
│ Median OS           │ 6.4 months                           │
│ Any-grade AE        │ 73%                                  │
│ Grade ≥3 AE         │ 23%                                  │
│ Treatment-related   │ 3%                                   │
│   death             │                                      │
├─────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────────┤
│ PD-L1+ vs PD-L1- ORR: SIMILAR (not predictive)            │
│ HPV+ vs HPV- response: HPV+ shows more favorable profile  │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

5. Treatment Flowcharts

5.1 Overall ICI Decision Algorithm for Advanced/Recurrent VSCC

                    ADVANCED / RECURRENT / METASTATIC VSCC
                                      │
                    ┌─────────────────▼──────────────────┐
                    │   Biomarker Testing (MANDATORY)     │
                    │  • PD-L1 (CPS, IHC 22C3 assay)     │
                    │  • MSI / MMR status (IHC/PCR)       │
                    │  • TMB (NGS panel)                  │
                    │  • HPV status                       │
                    │  • NTRK fusion (NGS)                │
                    └─────────────────┬──────────────────┘
                                      │
              ┌───────────────────────┼───────────────────────┐
              │                       │                       │
    ┌─────────▼──────────┐  ┌────────▼────────┐   ┌─────────▼──────────┐
    │ 1st LINE THERAPY   │  │ NTRK FUSION +   │   │ MSI-H / dMMR       │
    │                    │  │                 │   │ TMB-High ≥10 mut/Mb │
    │ Pembrolizumab +    │  │ Larotrectinib   │   │                     │
    │ Paclitaxel +       │  │   OR            │   │ Pembrolizumab       │
    │ Cisplatin/Carbo    │  │ Entrectinib     │   │ (any line)          │
    │ ± Bevacizumab*     │  │                 │   │                     │
    │ (PD-L1+ preferred) │  └─────────────────┘   └─────────────────────┘
    └─────────┬──────────┘
              │
    ┌─────────▼──────────┐
    │   PROGRESSION /    │
    │   2nd LINE+        │
    │                    │
    │ PD-L1+ (CPS≥1):    │
    │ Pembrolizumab mono │
    │                    │
    │ HPV+:              │
    │ Nivolumab          │
    │                    │
    │ PD-L1+ or -:       │
    │ Nivo + Ipi         │
    │ (DART regimen)     │
    │                    │
    │ Any SCC:           │
    │ Pembro + Vorinostat│
    │ (PEVOsq data)      │
    └─────────┬──────────┘
              │
    ┌─────────▼──────────┐
    │ MONITORING &       │
    │ RESPONSE ASSESS    │
    │                    │
    │ RECIST v1.1 q8-12w │
    │ irAE surveillance  │
    │ PD-L1 re-biopsy if │
    │ initial -ve        │
    └────────────────────┘

*Bevacizumab + pembrolizumab may be continued as maintenance after response

5.2 Locally Advanced (Unresectable) VSCC - Perioperative Immunotherapy

         LOCALLY ADVANCED UNRESECTABLE VSCC (Stage III-IVA)
                              │
              ┌───────────────▼───────────────┐
              │    MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM      │
              │     (Gyn-Onc + Rad-Onc)        │
              └───────────────┬───────────────┘
                              │
         ┌────────────────────┼────────────────────┐
         │                    │                    │
┌────────▼───────┐  ┌────────▼────────┐  ┌────────▼───────┐
│ NEOADJUVANT   │  │ CONCURRENT CRT  │  │ MITO VULVA-01  │
│ CHEMOTHERAPY  │  │ IMMUNOTHERAPY   │  │ (Ongoing Trial) │
│               │  │                 │  │                 │
│ Carboplatin + │  │ Pembrolizumab + │  │ Lenvatinib +    │
│ Paclitaxel    │  │ Cisplatin +     │  │ Pembrolizumab   │
│ ± Bevacizumab │  │ IMRT (68.4 Gy) │  │ x4 cycles then  │
│               │  │ (Yeku trial:   │  │ Pembro maint.   │
│               │  │  ORR 75%)      │  │ x35 cycles      │
└────────┬───────┘  └────────┬────────┘  └────────┬───────┘
         │                   │                    │
         └───────────────────┼────────────────────┘
                             │
              ┌──────────────▼──────────────┐
              │  RESPONSE ASSESSMENT        │
              │  (MRI ± biopsy at 8-12 wks) │
              └──────────────┬──────────────┘
                             │
              ┌──────────────┴──────────────┐
              │                             │
    ┌─────────▼──────┐           ┌──────────▼─────┐
    │ COMPLETE /     │           │ STABLE / PD    │
    │ PARTIAL        │           │                │
    │ RESPONSE       │           │ Consider       │
    │                │           │ exenteration   │
    │ Surgical       │           │ or palliative  │
    │ resection OR   │           │ care           │
    │ continued ICI  │           │                │
    │ maintenance    │           │                │
    └────────────────┘           └────────────────┘

6. Mechanisms of Action: ICI Classes Used in VSCC

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    ICI MECHANISMS IN VSCC                           │
├─────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ DRUG CLASS      │ MECHANISM                                         │
├─────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Anti-PD-1       │ Blocks PD-1 receptor on T cells → prevents        │
│ (Pembrolizumab, │ PD-L1/PD-L2 binding → restores T-cell activation  │
│  Nivolumab,     │ and cytotoxic killing of tumor cells              │
│  Cemiplimab)    │                                                   │
├─────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Anti-CTLA-4     │ Blocks CTLA-4 on T cells/Tregs → disinhibits      │
│ (Ipilimumab)    │ T-cell priming phase in lymph nodes → enhances    │
│                 │ systemic anti-tumor immune activation             │
├─────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Anti-PD-L1      │ Blocks PD-L1 on tumor/APCs → prevents engagement  │
│ (Atezolizumab,  │ with PD-1 on T cells; also preserves PD-L2 signal │
│  Avelumab,      │ for peripheral tolerance                         │
│  Durvalumab)    │                                                   │
├─────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Dual PD-1 +     │ Synergistic: CTLA-4 block expands T-cell pool;    │
│ CTLA-4 block    │ PD-1 block re-activates exhausted TILs in TME     │
│ (Nivo + Ipi)    │ → higher ORR (18.8% DART; CBR 25%)               │
└─────────────────┴───────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

7. Predictive Biomarkers: What We Know (and Don't Know)

7.1 Current Biomarker Summary Table

BiomarkerTest MethodThresholdPredictive ValueRecommendation
PD-L1 CPSIHC (22C3 clone)CPS ≥1Uncertain - ORR similar in PD-L1+ vs - in meta-analysisRequired for FDA-approved 2nd-line pembrolizumab
PD-L1 TPSIHC (28-8 clone)TPS ≥1%Used in CheckMate 358Less well-validated in VSCC
MSI-H / dMMRIHC (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) + PCRAny MSI-HHigh - agnostic approvalTest all advanced VSCC
TMBNGS (324-gene panel)≥10 mut/MbModerateTest all advanced VSCC
HPV statusPCR / p16 IHCHPV+Favorable signal (more inflamed TME)Not yet a selection criterion
HDAC activation signatureWES / transcriptomicsResearch onlyPromising in PEVOsqInvestigational
HLA expressionIHC / sequencingResearch onlyPredicts pembro+vorinostat response (PEVOsq, ESMO 2025)Investigational
LAG-3 / Galectin-3IHCResearch onlyImmune suppression markerInvestigational target

7.2 Biomarker Testing Flowchart

          NEW DIAGNOSIS OF ADVANCED/RECURRENT VSCC
                           │
            ┌──────────────▼──────────────┐
            │   TISSUE BIOPSY (REQUIRED)  │
            │   Fresh or archival FFPE    │
            └──────────────┬──────────────┘
                           │
         ┌─────────────────┼─────────────────┐
         │                 │                 │
┌────────▼───────┐ ┌───────▼────────┐ ┌─────▼──────────┐
│ STANDARD IHC   │ │  MMR STATUS    │ │   NGS PANEL    │
│                │ │                │ │                │
│ PD-L1 (22C3)  │ │ MLH1, MSH2     │ │ TMB (≥10       │
│ → CPS score   │ │ MSH6, PMS2     │ │ mut/Mb)        │
│               │ │ → IHC loss     │ │                │
│ p16/HPV status│ │ → MSI-PCR      │ │ NTRK1/2/3      │
│               │ │   if IHC +ve   │ │ fusions        │
└────────┬───────┘ └───────┬────────┘ └─────┬──────────┘
         │                 │                 │
         └─────────────────▼─────────────────┘
                           │
            ┌──────────────▼──────────────┐
            │  TREATMENT DECISION MATRIX  │
            │  (See Section 5 flowchart)  │
            └─────────────────────────────┘

8. Combination Strategies: Emerging Evidence

8.1 ICI + Chemotherapy

  • Pembrolizumab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + Paclitaxel ± Bevacizumab: NCCN Category 1 preferred first-line for recurrent/metastatic VSCC (extrapolated from KEYNOTE-826 cervical cancer data)
  • Rationale: chemotherapy induces immunogenic cell death (ICD), increases tumor antigen presentation, potentially synergizing with ICI

8.2 ICI + HDAC Inhibitors (PEVOsq Trial - Nat Cancer 2025)

The PEVOsq trial [PMID: 40588522] - a phase 2 basket trial of pembrolizumab + vorinostat in recurrent/metastatic SCC:
  • Vulvar/vaginal cohort ORR: 19%
  • Median OS: 17.5 months (best OS data in the field)
  • 91% had any-grade treatment-related AE; 39% grade 3+
  • Vorinostat dose reduction required in 66% due to toxicity
  • Biomarker analysis: HDAC activation signatures, HLA expression predict response (ESMO 2025 presentation)
  • Mechanism: HDAC inhibition reverses epigenetic silencing of immune genes, re-sensitizes "cold" tumors to PD-1 blockade

8.3 ICI + Radiation (CRT + Immunotherapy)

  • Yeku et al. (Phase II): Pembrolizumab (200 mg IV q3w x12 cycles) + weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m²) + IMRT (68.4 Gy primary; 45 Gy pelvic/inguinal)
  • ORR 75% in locally advanced setting - highest reported ORR in VSCC
  • Rationale: radiation induces abscopal effect, enhances tumor antigenicity and PD-L1 upregulation, creating an "in situ vaccine" effect

8.4 ICI + Anti-Angiogenics

  • Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab (MITO VULVA-01, NCT07290894 - recruiting):
    • 3 cohorts: locally advanced treatment-naive, recurrent/metastatic chemo-naive, 2nd-line+
    • Lenvatinib 20 mg/day + pembrolizumab 200 mg q3w
    • Rationale: VEGFR/FGFR inhibition normalizes vasculature, reduces immunosuppressive M2 macrophages in TME

8.5 Dual Checkpoint Blockade (SWOG S1609 DART)

  • Ipilimumab (1 mg/kg q6w) + Nivolumab (240 mg q2w) [PMID: 39561273]
  • N=16, ORR 18.8%, CBR 25%, 3 durable responses >1 year
  • Median OS 7.6 months; Grade 3-4 AE in 25%; one grade 5 death
  • All responders had squamous histology; correlative biomarker studies ongoing

9. Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) in VSCC Immunotherapy

9.1 irAE Profile Table

irAE CategoryCommon EventsFrequency (VSCC trials)Management
GastrointestinalDiarrhea, colitis25% (DART)Grade 1-2: loperamide; Grade 3+: corticosteroids, hold ICI
DermatologicPruritus, rash25% (DART)Topical steroids; antihistamines
EndocrineHypothyroidism, adrenal insufficiencyVariableHormone replacement; rarely requires ICI discontinuation
HepaticTransaminase elevation, immune hepatitisRare but grade 5 reported (PEVOsq)Corticosteroids; mycophenolate if refractory
PulmonaryPneumonitisRareHold ICI; corticosteroids
RenalNephritis, CKDRare (PEVOsq)Hold ICI; corticosteroids
FatigueAsthenia25%+ all trialsSupportive care
Overall grade ≥3All types23% (meta-analysis pooled)Individualized per organ system
Treatment-related death3%-

10. Special Considerations

10.1 HPV+ vs HPV- VSCC: Differential ICI Response

┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│              HPV STATUS AND ICI RESPONSE                      │
├──────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┤
│ HPV-POSITIVE VSCC        │ HPV-NEGATIVE VSCC                  │
├──────────────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────┤
│ • Inflamed TME           │ • "Desert" or "excluded" TME       │
│ • Higher TIL density     │ • Lower TIL density                │
│ • MHC-I expression       │ • MHC-I downregulation common      │
│   preserved              │ • Lichen sclerosus associated      │
│ • HPV oncoproteins E6/E7 │ • PD-L1 positivity paradoxically   │
│   as neoantigens         │   more frequent but less ICI       │
│ • More favorable ICI     │   responsive                       │
│   response (emerging)    │ • Lower overall ICI response       │
│ • UCPVax vaccine target  │ • May need combination strategies  │
│   (telomerase CD4 TH1    │   to overcome "cold" TME           │
│   inducer; VolATIL trial)│                                    │
└──────────────────────────┴────────────────────────────────────┘

10.2 Cemiplimab in VSCC

  • Cemiplimab (anti-PD-1) has been reported in case reports for VSCC - including a notable case of induction chemotherapy with cemiplimab in a patient with coexistent vulvar cancer and autoimmune disease [PMID: 39252763]
  • Demonstrates feasibility of ICI even in select autoimmune disease patients with careful monitoring
  • No large trial data specific to VSCC yet; NCCN lists as "useful in certain circumstances" for some vulvar tumor subtypes

10.3 Therapeutic Vaccines (Emerging)

  • UCPVax (telomerase-specific CD4 TH1-inducer cancer vaccine) + atezolizumab - VolATIL study (Phase II): targets HPV+ cancers including vulvar; aims to combine active vaccination with ICI to overcome low neoantigen load
  • Therapeutic HPV vaccines targeting E6/E7 in HPV+ VSCC - preclinical and early clinical development

11. Current Ongoing Trials (Active as of 2025-2026)

Trial NameNCTAgent(s)SettingStatus
MITO VULVA-01NCT07290894Pembrolizumab + LenvatinibLocally advanced, recurrent/metastatic VSCCRecruiting (2025)
VolATILPhase IIUCPVax + AtezolizumabHPV+ cancers including vulvarReported 2022
PEVOsqNCT04357873Pembrolizumab + VorinostatRecurrent/metastatic SCC (vulvar/vaginal cohort)Completed - Results in Nat Cancer 2025
SWOG S1609 DARTNCT02834013Ipilimumab + NivolumabRare tumors basket (vulvar cohort)Published Clin Cancer Res 2025

12. Limitations and Future Directions

12.1 Current Limitations

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    KEY LIMITATIONS                              │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Small sample sizes (most VSCC ICI trials: <20 vulvar pts)    │
│ 2. No randomized controlled trials in VSCC-specific ICI         │
│ 3. PD-L1 NOT reliably predictive in meta-analysis (ORR similar  │
│    in PD-L1+ and PD-L1- subgroups)                             │
│ 4. HPV status association not yet validated for selection        │
│ 5. Short mPFS (2.2 mo) despite durable responses in minority    │
│ 6. EMA has NOT approved ICIs for VSCC                           │
│ 7. Vorinostat combination: high toxicity (66% dose reduction)   │
│ 8. Lack of head-to-head comparisons                             │
│ 9. No validated predictive biomarker panel for VSCC             │
│10. Disease rarity limits accrual to biomarker-stratified RCTs   │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

12.2 Future Directions

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                 FUTURE RESEARCH PRIORITIES                      │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ BIOMARKER DEVELOPMENT                                           │
│ • Validate HLA expression and HDAC signatures as predictors     │
│ • Multiplex IHC for immune contexture (TIL density, CD8/Treg   │
│   ratio)                                                       │
│ • Integrate spatial transcriptomics of TME                      │
│                                                                 │
│ COMBINATION STRATEGIES                                          │
│ • ICI + LAG-3 inhibitors (relatlimab)                          │
│ • ICI + EGFR inhibitors (cetuximab - EGFR overexpressed 60-80%)│
│ • ICI + PARP inhibitors (DNA damage → immunogenic cell death)  │
│ • ICI + therapeutic HPV vaccines (neoantigen-directed)          │
│                                                                 │
│ CLINICAL TRIAL DESIGN                                           │
│ • Biomarker-stratified RCTs (urgently needed)                   │
│ • Window-of-opportunity trials (neoadjuvant ICI)                │
│ • Basket trials stratified by molecular subtype                 │
│ • International collaboration (due to rarity of VSCC)          │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

13. Summary Evidence Table

ParameterEvidence LevelKey Finding
Pembrolizumab 2nd-line (PD-L1+/MSI-H/TMB-H)FDA-approved (KEYNOTE-158)ORR 10.9%; durable responses
Nivolumab monotherapyPhase I/II (CheckMate 358)ORR 20% (small n); stabilization in HPV+ and HPV-
Dual ICI (nivo+ipi)Phase II RCT (DART)ORR 18.8%; durable (>1yr) in all 3 responders
Pembro + vorinostatPhase II basket (PEVOsq, Nat Cancer 2025)ORR 19% vulvar/vaginal; best mOS 17.5 mo
Pembro + CRTPhase II (Yeku)ORR 75% locally advanced - promising neoadjuvant signal
Pooled ICI efficacySR + MA 2025 (Maiorano et al.)Pooled ORR 21%; mPFS 2.2 mo; mOS 6.4 mo
PD-L1 as predictorSR + MA 2025NOT reliably predictive; ORR similar in PD-L1+ vs -
HPV status as predictorEmerging evidenceHPV+ likely more ICI-responsive; not yet practice-changing
ICI safetyPooled data73% any AE; 23% grade ≥3; 3% treatment-related death

Key References

  1. Maiorano MFP et al. Immunotherapy and Advanced Vulvar Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival and Safety Outcomes. Cancers. 2025 Jul;17(14):2392. PMID: 40723274
  2. Chae YK et al. A Phase II Basket Trial of Dual Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors SWOG S1609: Vulvar Cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2025 Jan 17. PMID: 39561273
  3. Borcoman E et al. Efficacy of pembrolizumab and vorinostat combination in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinomas: a phase 2 basket trial. Nat Cancer. 2025 Aug. PMID: 40588522
  4. Arenhardt MP et al. Efficacy and safety of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in advanced vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: A scoping review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2025 Jun. PMID: 40068805
  5. Zafar M et al. Advances and Challenges in the Treatment of HPV-Associated Lower Genital Tract Cancers by Immune Checkpoint Blockers. Cancers. 2025 Apr. PMID: 40282436
  6. Santoro A et al. The emerging and challenging role of PD-L1 in patients with gynecological cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2024 May. PMID: 38295614
  7. MITO VULVA-01 Trial. Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib in Vulvar Cancer. NCT07290894. 2025.
---Here is a summary of what this overview covers:

What This Overview Covers

This is a comprehensive, evidence-based synthesis drawn from 7 key publications (2022-2025), including the most up-to-date systematic review + meta-analysis (Maiorano et al., Cancers 2025, N=181 patients across 6 trials) and multiple Phase II trials reported as recently as August 2025.

Key Takeaways:

Efficacy: ICIs show modest but real activity in VSCC - pooled ORR 21% (monotherapy 11%, combination 46%). The best results come from combination approaches, particularly pembro + CRT (ORR 75% in locally advanced disease) and pembro + vorinostat (mOS 17.5 months - best survival data in the field).
Biomarkers: This is the critical gap. PD-L1 is required for FDA-approved second-line pembrolizumab use, but meta-analysis shows PD-L1 does NOT reliably predict response. MSI-H/dMMR and TMB-High remain the most actionable biomarkers. HPV status appears to influence TME immunogenicity favorably but is not yet a selection criterion.
Safety: Manageable but not trivial - 23% grade ≥3 AEs, 3% treatment-related death in pooled data.
Regulatory status: FDA-approved for pembrolizumab (biomarker-driven), NCCN-listed for nivolumab; EMA has NOT yet approved ICIs for VSCC.
Most urgent need: Biomarker-stratified, randomized controlled trials - which do not yet exist for VSCC-specific ICI use.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.