How to arrive to a pathological and suspicious and normal ctg

Reading File
Now let me search the medical library for CTG classification content in parallel:
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching the Web

CTG classification normal suspicious pathological FIGO 2015 criteria fetal heart rate

Finding Sources
Reading Web Page

https://www.sigo.it/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Linee-Guida-F…

Finding Sources
Searching Images

CTG cardiotocography classification normal suspicious pathological fetal heart rate

Reading File
Loading Image
Loading Image
I now have comprehensive information to give a complete answer. Let me also fetch the pathological CTG image:
Loading Image
Here is a comprehensive guide to CTG (cardiotocography) classification using the FIGO 2015 guidelines — the current international standard that divides tracings into Normal, Suspicious, and Pathological.

CTG Classification: Normal, Suspicious, and Pathological

Step 1 — Evaluate the Four Core CTG Features

Before classifying, assess each of these independently:
FeatureWhat to measure
Baseline FHRMean FHR over a 10-min window (excluding accelerations/decelerations)
VariabilityAmplitude of beat-to-beat fluctuation around the baseline
AccelerationsTransient rises in FHR ≥15 bpm lasting ≥15 sec
DecelerationsTransient falls in FHR — classify by timing and shape

Step 2 — Define Each Feature (Normal Ranges)

Baseline FHR

  • Normal: 110–160 bpm
  • Tachycardia: >160 bpm
  • Bradycardia: <110 bpm (100–110 bpm = intermediate/suspicious zone)

Baseline Variability

  • Normal: 5–25 bpm amplitude
  • Reduced: <5 bpm
  • Increased (saltatory): >25 bpm
  • Sinusoidal: smooth, undulating sine-wave pattern ≥30 min — always pathological

Accelerations

  • Presence = reassuring (fetus without hypoxia/acidosis)
  • Absence during labour is not itself pathological, but is of uncertain significance

Decelerations — Types

TypeOnsetCauseSignificance
EarlyGradual, mirrors contractionHead compressionBenign
VariableAbrupt (<30 sec to nadir)Cord compressionContext-dependent
LateGradual, begins after contraction peak; nadir >30 sec after onsetUteroplacental insufficiency → fetal hypoxemiaMost concerning
ProlongedSingle deceleration lasting ≥2 minVariousDuration determines severity

Step 3 — Classify the Tracing (FIGO 2015)

FeatureNormalSuspiciousPathological
Baseline110–160 bpmLacks ≥1 normal feature, but no pathological feature<100 bpm
Variability5–25 bpmReduced <5 bpm for >50 min, or increased >25 bpm for >30 minSinusoidal pattern ≥30 min
DecelerationsNo repetitive decelerationsRepetitive decelerations present (but don't meet pathological criteria)Repetitive late or prolonged decelerations for >30 min (or >20 min if variability is also reduced), OR a single prolonged deceleration >5 min
Clinical meaningNo hypoxia/acidosisLow probability of hypoxia/acidosisHigh probability of hypoxia/acidosis
"Repetitive" = occurring with ≥50% of contractions over a 20–30 min window.

Step 4 — Management by Category

ClassificationAction
NormalNo intervention needed for fetal oxygenation; continue monitoring
SuspiciousCorrect reversible causes (maternal position, hydration, oxytocin reduction), close monitoring, consider additional fetal assessment (e.g. scalp pH/lactate, fetal pulse oximetry)
PathologicalImmediate action: correct reversible causes + additional fetal assessment OR expedite delivery. In acute situations (cord prolapse, uterine rupture, placental abruption) → immediate delivery

ACOG Three-Tier System (used in the USA)

The USA uses a parallel Category I/II/III system:
CategoryEquivalentCriteria
Category I (Normal)NormalBaseline 110–160 bpm, moderate variability, ± accelerations, no late/variable decelerations
Category II (Indeterminate)SuspiciousEverything not in I or III — requires continued observation
Category III (Abnormal)PathologicalAbsent variability WITH: recurrent late decelerations, recurrent variable decelerations, bradycardia, OR sinusoidal pattern
(Barash, Clinical Anesthesia 9e)

Visual Examples

Normal vs. Suspicious CTG:
Normal CTG (left) shows high variability and multiple accelerations; Suspicious CTG (right) shows reduced variability and fewer accelerations
Left (a): Normal — high beat-to-beat variability with multiple accelerations. Right (b): Suspicious — flattened trace with reduced variability.

Pathological vs. Normal comparison:
Pathological CTG (top) shows frequent deep decelerations with minimal accelerations; Normal CTG (bottom) shows small decelerations and prominent accelerations
Top: Pathological trace (pH < 7.05) — frequent, deep decelerations, minimal accelerations. Bottom: Normal — reactive pattern with accelerations.

Pathological — deep variable decelerations:
CTG strip with deep variable decelerations reaching below 100 bpm coinciding with uterine contractions
Deep, prolonged variable decelerations (>60 bpm depth, >60 sec duration) with frequent contractions — pathological by FIGO criteria.

Key Pitfalls

  • Absent accelerations alone do not make a trace suspicious during labour — this is of uncertain significance
  • Reduced variability is only suspicious if present for >50 minutes continuously; short periods may reflect fetal sleep cycle (~20 min)
  • A single prolonged deceleration >5 min = pathological regardless of other features
  • CTG has significant inter-observer variability — the suspicious/pathological boundary has the lowest agreement among clinicians
  • A normal CTG effectively excludes current hypoxia/acidosis; however, suspicious and pathological traces have a high false-positive rate for metabolic acidosis

Sources: FIGO 2015 Consensus Guidelines on Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring; Barash, Cullen & Stoelting's Clinical Anesthesia 9e (Table 41-8); NICE CTG classification framework.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.