attachment
attachment

interpret; this is my answer - Resistance is elevated at 5 Hz and 20 Hz. Resistance appears to be frequency dependent. Reactance is normal Resonant frequency is elevated. There is an obstructive airway pattern with a significant peripheral/small-airway component. Postbronchodilator study showed significant response with 56% improvement in resistance and 88% decrease in area of reactance.

Reading File
analyse_media
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

oscillometry AND bronchodilator

Searching the Web

ERS technical standard respiratory oscillometry bronchodilator response R5 AX interpretation

Reading File
Reading Web Page

https://publications.ersnet.org/content/erjor/11/6/00398-202…

Reading File
Your interpretation is broadly correct, with two refinements:
  • Resistance is elevated across all measured frequencies, not only R5 and R20:
    • R5 0.88, 203% predicted, z-score +3.44
    • R20 0.65, 173% predicted, z-score +2.50
  • There is marked frequency dependence of resistance: R5-R20 is 0.76 pre-bronchodilator, falling to 0.37 post-bronchodilator. This supports a peripheral/small-airway component, but R20 elevation also indicates increased resistance in more central conducting airways. So it is not purely small-airway disease.
  • Reactance at 5 Hz (X5) is within the reference range pre-bronchodilator (z-score about -0.08), so saying “reactance is normal” is reasonable. However, AX is substantially elevated (4.43) and Fres is high (40.19 Hz), both supporting abnormal peripheral airway mechanics.
  • The study shows a very large bronchodilator response:
    • R5 decreases 56%: 0.88 to 0.39
    • R20 decreases 46%: 0.65 to 0.35
    • R5-R20 decreases 52%
    • Fres decreases 53%: 40.19 to 18.88 Hz
    • AX decreases 88%: 4.43 to 0.55
A more polished report would read:
Abnormal impulse oscillometry with increased respiratory resistance at 5-20 Hz and marked frequency dependence of resistance (elevated R5-R20), consistent with airflow obstruction involving both central and peripheral airways, with a prominent small-airway component. X5 is within normal limits; however, Fres and AX are elevated, further supporting peripheral airway dysfunction. Following bronchodilator, there is a marked response, with reductions in R5 (56%), R20 (46%), R5-R20 (52%), Fres (53%), and AX (88%). Findings demonstrate significant reversible airway obstruction. Clinical correlation with spirometry and the overall clinical setting is advised.
Avoid claiming that IOS alone establishes a specific diagnosis such as asthma. It demonstrates reversible obstructive physiology, which can support asthma when the history and other pulmonary function results fit. Recent ERS expert consensus similarly emphasizes R5, R5-R20, X5, and AX for oscillometry interpretation, with R5 and AX abnormalities assessed against reference-based z-scores and bronchodilator response commonly assessed as percent change (ERS interpretation study).
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.