---

AUTOMATED BREAST VOLUME SCANNER (ABVS)

Comprehensive Exam Notes

---

1. DEFINITION

---

2. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

---

3. INDICATIONS

Primary Indications

1. Supplemental screening in women with dense breast tissue (ACR BI-RADS density C or D) — most important indication
2. Characterization of breast lesions detected on mammography or HHUS
3. Preoperative assessment — accurate lesion extent measurement for surgical planning
4. Monitoring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
5. Post-treatment follow-up after breast-conserving surgery (BCS)
6. High-risk screening — BRCA mutation carriers, family history, prior chest radiation
7. Difficult-to-examine breasts — large breasts where HHUS coverage is incomplete

Additional/Extended Indications

1. Evaluation of multi-focal/multi-centric disease
2. Screening in younger women (<40 years) where radiation exposure from mammography is a concern
3. Novel application: soft tissue tumor evaluation beyond the breast (Chen et al., 2015)

Contraindications / Limitations

• Open wounds or skin lesions over the breast
• Patients unable to maintain prone position
• Very small breasts (may not achieve adequate coupling)
• Not suitable as a standalone diagnostic tool — requires correlation with mammography/HHUS

---

4. INSTRUMENTATION

System Components (Siemens ACUSON S2000 ABVS)

A. Transducer

• Type: Wide-aperture (15.4 cm footprint), linear array transducer
• Frequency range: 5–14 MHz (high-frequency, broad bandwidth)
• Footprint: ~15 cm × 17 cm — much wider than HHUS transducers
• Contains hundreds of piezoelectric elements arranged in a linear array

B. Motorized Scanning Unit

• A flexible robotic arm holds the transducer
• Automated, motorized sweep mechanism moves the transducer across the breast at a constant, controlled speed
• Eliminates operator-dependent variability in angulation and pressure

C. Coupling Pad / Membrane

• A soft silicon membrane (coupling pad) is pre-filled with aqueous gel
• Conforms to breast contour, providing uniform acoustic coupling
• Ensures consistent stand-off distance across the entire breast surface

D. Touchscreen Interface

• Controls scan parameters, breast size selection, scan position
• Allows marking of breast position (LCC, LML, LMLO equivalent orientations)

E. 3D Workstation

• High-performance workstation with dedicated post-processing software
• Reconstructs 3D volume from raw data
• Generates multiplanar reconstructions (MPR) in all three planes
• Allows scrolling through volumetric dataset slice by slice
• Integrated with PACS for image storage and reporting

---

5. TECHNICAL PARAMETERS

Presettings Based on Breast Size

• Scan depth
• Focus zones
• Gain curves
• Number of scan positions required

Coupling Medium

• Aqueous gel inside a flexible silicon membrane pad
• Alternative: direct gel application + membrane

---

6. PATIENT POSITIONING TECHNIQUES

Standard Prone Position Protocol

1. Patient lies prone on a dedicated examination table with a breast aperture (hole in the table through which the breast hangs freely)
2. The affected breast hangs dependently through the aperture
3. The ABVS transducer (with coupling pad) is applied to the inferior surface of the breast from below
4. The motorized arm performs the automated sweep

This prone position ensures the breast is pendulous, maximally uncompressed, and well-separated from the chest wall — unlike the supine position used in HHUS.

Standard Scan Positions (3 scans per breast for complete coverage)

• For large breasts, 4–5 acquisitions may be needed
• The axilla/tail of Spence may require an additional dedicated scan
• Each scan takes ~90 seconds; total examination = ~10–15 minutes per breast

Positioning Variants

• Some protocols allow supine/semi-supine positioning with modified transducer application (used in certain commercial ABUS systems)
• Nipple must be marked to serve as an anatomical reference for MPR alignment

Patient Preparation

• No special preparation required
• Inform patient about prone positioning and mild transducer pressure
• Gel application to membrane or breast surface

---

7. MODES OF DISPLAY (Multiplanar Reconstruction — MPR)

A. Transverse (Axial) Plane

• Standard 2D cross-sectional view (equivalent to HHUS B-mode)
• Shows lesion shape, echogenicity, margins in the horizontal plane
• Familiar to sonographers accustomed to HHUS

B. Sagittal Plane

• Vertical cross-section from superior to inferior
• Complements the transverse plane for lesion characterization

C. Coronal Plane ⭐ (UNIQUE to ABVS — Most Important)

• En face view of the breast from front to back
• Cannot be obtained by HHUS
• Shows the entire breast parenchymal architecture in one plane
• Allows visualization of lesion relationship to entire breast and chest wall
• Shows Cooper's ligaments converging toward the nipple ("convergence sign")

Key Coronal Plane Signs:

D. Volume Rendering / 3D Rendering Mode

• Produces a rendered 3D image of the breast volume
• Useful for surgical planning and lesion localization
• Less used in routine diagnosis

---

8. ANALYSIS — LESION CHARACTERIZATION

BI-RADS Descriptors Used with ABVS

Key Sonographic Features Assessed

Shape

• Oval / Round → Benign
• Irregular → Suspicious

Margins

• Circumscribed → Benign
• Spiculated / Angular / Microlobulated → Malignant
• Spiculated + stellate margin in coronal plane → High specificity for malignancy (Wang et al., 2012)

Orientation

• Parallel (wider-than-tall) → Benign
• Non-parallel (taller-than-wide) → Suspicious

Echogenicity

• Hyperechoic → Benign (lipoma, fat necrosis)
• Hypoechoic → Requires evaluation
• Anechoic → Cyst (if with posterior enhancement)
• Complex / Heterogeneous → Worrisome

Posterior Acoustic Features

• Enhancement → Cysts, high-grade tumors
• Shadowing → Fibrosis, malignancy
• No change → Indeterminate

Coronal Plane Specific Analysis

• Presence/absence of retraction phenomenon — single most important ABVS-specific feature
• Assessment of architectural distortion in the en face view
• Relationship of lesion to nipple, skin, chest wall

Measurement

• ABVS allows 3D volumetric measurement of lesion in all three planes simultaneously
• More accurate than 2D HHUS for preoperative extent assessment (Tozaki & Fukuma, 2010)

---

9. COMPARISON: ABVS vs. HAND-HELD ULTRASOUND (HHUS)

Wang et al. (2012): Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy were similar between ABVS and HHUS, but both were significantly superior to mammography in dense breasts.

---

10. PERFORMANCE METRICS (Evidence-Based)

---

11. ADVANTAGES OF ABVS

1. Operator independence — results are not dependent on sonographer skill/experience
2. Standardized, reproducible images — ideal for serial monitoring
3. Coronal plane — unique en face visualization unavailable with HHUS
4. 3D volumetric assessment — accurate lesion size/extent measurement
5. Complete breast coverage — standardized full-volume acquisition
6. No ionizing radiation — safer than mammography/CT for repeated use
7. Shorter per-patient time than HHUS for screening large populations
8. Better documentation — complete archived volume for retrospective review
9. Surgical planning — coronal view aids localization relative to Cooper's ligaments, chest wall
10. Telemedicine compatibility — stored volumes can be read remotely

---

12. LIMITATIONS / DISADVANTAGES

1. No real-time imaging — cannot perform dynamic maneuvers (compression, color Doppler during scan)
2. No Doppler during acquisition — vascular information not captured in automated sweep
3. Nipple shadowing artifact in coronal plane — can mimic architectural distortion (false positive)
4. Acoustic shadowing from ribs/chest wall — limits posterior visualization
5. Learning curve for coronal plane interpretation — radiologists unfamiliar with en face view
6. High initial cost of equipment and workstation
7. Longer reading time — large volumetric datasets take more time to review
8. Not real-time — cannot guide biopsies directly (biopsy still requires HHUS)
9. Positioning challenges for patients unable to lie prone
10. Limited axillary coverage — tail of Spence may need additional scan position
11. Inter-rater reliability — published studies show heterogeneous quality; more standardization needed

---

13. ARTIFACTS IN ABVS

---

14. CLINICAL APPLICATIONS

A. Breast Cancer Screening

• Primary role: Supplemental screening in dense breasts (BI-RADS C/D)
• Detects mammographically occult cancers — especially in dense glandular tissue
• Particularly valuable for invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) — which is notoriously difficult to detect on mammography

B. Lesion Characterization

• Distinguishes benign vs malignant based on BI-RADS descriptors
• Retraction phenomenon in coronal plane → highly specific for malignancy
• Cysts: white-wall sign in coronal plane

C. Preoperative Staging

• Accurate 3D measurement of tumor extent
• Assessment of multifocality/multicentricity
• Tumor-to-nipple distance measurement for surgical planning

D. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Monitoring

• Serial volumetric measurements for treatment response assessment
• Standardized, reproducible follow-up scans

E. Post-Treatment Surveillance

• Follow-up after BCS and radiation
• Detecting local recurrence

F. High-Risk Screening

• Complementary to MRI in BRCA mutation carriers
• Alternative when MRI is contraindicated (pacemaker, claustrophobia)

G. Novel Applications

• Soft tissue tumors outside the breast (Chen et al., 2015)
• Photoacoustic hybrid ABVS (PAUS-ABVS) — experimental, combining optical and acoustic imaging for functional information

---

15. REPORTING SYSTEM — BI-RADS INTEGRATION

---

16. IMAGES

---

---

17. KEY EXAM POINTS TO REMEMBER

Mnemonic — ABVS = "A Beautiful View of the breast in 3D Space"

1. ABVS uses a 15 cm wide-footprint transducer at 5–14 MHz
2. Patient positioned prone (hanging breast through aperture)
3. 3 scan positions per breast = complete coverage
4. Coronal plane = unique feature, not available with HHUS
5. Retraction phenomenon / Sunburst sign on coronal = specific for malignancy
6. Nipple shadow = most common false positive artifact in coronal plane
7. Meta-analysis sensitivity = 92%, specificity = 84.9%
8. No real-time imaging — cannot guide biopsy directly
9. FDA cleared 2012 for supplemental screening in dense breasts
10. Combined with mammography + HHUS: accuracy reaches 96.4%
11. BI-RADS classification applies as with conventional ultrasound
12. Major advantage: operator independence and reproducibility

---

---

ABVS — PRINCIPLE AND INSTRUMENTATION

Detailed Exam Notes with Diagrams

---

PART 1: PRINCIPLE OF ABVS

A. Fundamental Physical Basis — Pulse-Echo Principle

Core Law: Sound waves travel through tissue, reflect at acoustic interfaces, and return to the transducer. The depth of the reflector is calculated from the time taken for the echo to return.

The Pulse-Echo Cycle (Step by Step):

• The piezoelectric crystals in the transducer receive a brief electrical impulse
• They vibrate and emit a short burst (pulse) of ultrasound waves at 5–14 MHz into breast tissue
• The pulse travels through breast tissue at approximately 1540 m/s (speed of sound in soft tissue)

• Wherever there is a change in acoustic impedance (Z = ρ × c, where ρ = density, c = speed of sound), part of the sound energy is reflected back as an echo
• Different tissue interfaces (skin–fat, fat–glandular, normal–lesion) produce echoes of varying amplitude
• Dense or solid tissues reflect more strongly → appear hyperechoic (bright)
• Fluid-filled structures reflect less → appear hypoechoic/anechoic (dark)

• The same piezoelectric crystals now act as receivers (alternating transmit/receive mode)
• Incoming echoes cause the crystals to vibrate → generate electrical signals proportional to echo amplitude

• d = depth of reflector (cm)
• c = speed of sound = 1540 m/s
• t = time elapsed between pulse and echo return
• Divided by 2 because the sound travels to the reflector AND back

• The amplitude of each echo is converted to brightness (B = Brightness)
• The position is mapped spatially using the depth (time-of-flight) and transducer element position
• Hundreds of scan lines side-by-side build up a single 2D B-mode image slice

---

B. What Makes ABVS Different From Conventional HHUS — The 3D Volumetric Principle

How 3D Volume is Built:

1. The wide-footprint transducer (15 cm) acquires a 2D B-mode image at Position 1
2. The motorized arm moves the transducer a fixed, precise distance (step increment)
3. Another 2D slice is acquired at Position 2
4. This continues automatically across the entire breast surface
5. Hundreds of parallel 2D slices, acquired at known intervals, are stacked together computationally to form a 3D volumetric dataset
6. The workstation then uses Multiplanar Reconstruction (MPR) to reconstruct any desired plane from this volume — including the unique coronal (en face) plane

---

C. The Coronal Plane — The Defining Principle of ABVS

• Not possible with HHUS (2D transducer cannot acquire this plane)
• Requires a full 3D volumetric dataset reconstructed computationally
• Shows Cooper's ligaments, parenchymal architecture, and tumor relationships in the en face view
• The retraction phenomenon / sunburst sign — visible only on the coronal plane — is highly specific for malignancy

---

Diagram 1: ABVS Pulse-Echo Principle + Automated Sweep → 3D Volume

1. Draw a rectangular transducer at top with small boxes inside = piezoelectric elements
2. Draw zigzag arrows going DOWN = transmitted pulses (label: 5–14 MHz)
3. Draw layers below: Skin / Fat / Glandular Tissue / Lesion
4. Draw arrows going UP from lesion back to transducer = reflected echoes
5. Write the formula box: d = (c × t) / 2, c = 1540 m/s
6. Below: draw transducer moving sideways → generating parallel vertical lines into tissue → these build up into stacked "2D Slice 1, 2, 3..." → arrow → "3D Volume" box

---

Diagram 2: Full ABVS System Diagram — Principle + Instrumentation + Planes

---

PART 2: INSTRUMENTATION IN DETAIL

Overview of ABVS System Components

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  ABVS SYSTEM COMPONENTS                         │
│  1. Wide-Footprint Linear Array Transducer      │
│  2. Motorized Robotic Arm                       │
│  3. Gel-Filled Silicon Coupling Membrane        │
│  4. Touchscreen Control Unit                    │
│  5. 3D Workstation (Post-Processing)            │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

---

Component 1: Wide-Footprint Linear Array Transducer ⭐

How It Works:

• Contains hundreds of piezoelectric elements arranged side by side in a linear row
• Each element can independently transmit and receive ultrasound pulses
• Elements fire in rapid sequence (electronic focusing) to build a 2D B-mode image
• The 15 cm footprint means each single sweep captures a wide tissue area — far more than HHUS
• Broadband (5–14 MHz): lower frequencies penetrate deeper; higher frequencies give better resolution of superficial lesions. The system automatically optimizes based on depth

Piezoelectric Effect (Core Physics):

• Direct piezoelectric effect: mechanical pressure → electrical signal (reception of echoes)
• Reverse piezoelectric effect: electrical signal → mechanical vibration (transmission of pulses)
• Material: usually PZT (Lead Zirconate Titanate) crystals
• Each element is electrically pulsed for ~1 microsecond → sends out a short pulse → then switches to receive mode

---

Component 2: Motorized Robotic Arm

• The arm ensures uniform pressure across the entire breast surface
• Prevents the operator variability inherent in HHUS (different sonographers apply different angles/pressures)
• The transducer position is continuously tracked by the system, which maps each 2D slice to its exact spatial location in the 3D volume

---

Component 3: Gel-Filled Silicon Coupling Membrane (Acoustic Coupling Pad)

• Without the membrane: air between transducer and skin would reflect virtually all ultrasound (acoustic impedance mismatch) — no image possible
• With the membrane: smooth acoustic coupling across the entire 15 cm footprint
• The membrane also protects the transducer from direct skin contact and contamination

---

Component 4: Touchscreen Control Unit

• Presets automatically configure: scan depth, time-gain compensation, focus zones, and compression based on breast size
• The nipple marker is critical for post-processing MPR alignment — it anchors the coronal plane reconstruction

---

Component 5: 3D Workstation (Post-Processing & Display Unit)

Functions:

1. Volumetric reconstruction: stacks all 2D slices into a seamless 3D dataset
2. Multiplanar Reconstruction (MPR): generates transverse, sagittal, and coronal planes
3. Scrolling: radiologist scrolls through each plane slice by slice
4. 3D rendering: surface or volume rendering for surgical planning
5. Measurement tools: 3D lesion size measurement in all three planes simultaneously
6. PACS integration: stores and transmits studies
7. BI-RADS reporting template: integrated reporting tools

Display Layout on Workstation:

┌──────────────┬──────────────┐
│  TRANSVERSE  │   SAGITTAL   │
│   (axial)    │  (vertical)  │
├──────────────┼──────────────┤
│   CORONAL    │  3D RENDER   │
│  (en face)   │   / INFO     │
└──────────────┴──────────────┘
     Quad-view MPR display

---

Summary Flowchart: ABVS — From Patient to Diagnosis

PATIENT (prone position, breast hanging through aperture)
           ↓
COUPLING MEMBRANE applied to breast surface
           ↓
TRANSDUCER (15 cm, 5–14 MHz) activated
           ↓
PIEZOELECTRIC CRYSTALS fire ultrasound pulses (5–14 MHz)
           ↓
PULSES penetrate breast tissue → reflect at acoustic interfaces
           ↓
ECHOES return → d = (c × t) / 2
           ↓
MOTORIZED ARM sweeps transducer → 2D Slice 1 → 2 → 3 → ... (hundreds)
           ↓
3D VOLUMETRIC DATASET assembled in workstation
           ↓
MPR RECONSTRUCTION: Transverse + Sagittal + CORONAL planes
           ↓
RADIOLOGIST reviews → BI-RADS classification → DIAGNOSIS

---

Key Exam Points for Principle & Instrumentation

---

---

STITCH RADIOGRAPHY

Detailed Exam Notes

---

1. DEFINITION

The term "stitch" refers to the process of digitally sewing together multiple images at their overlapping borders — analogous to stitching pieces of fabric.

• Long-length radiography
• Full-length radiography
• Teleoroentgenography (historical term for long-leg films)
• Slot-scan radiography (EOS system)
• Whole-spine radiography
• Panoramic radiography

---

2. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

• The full spine (cervical to sacrum = ~60–70 cm)
• Full lower limbs from hip to ankle (~90–100 cm)
• Full upper limb

---

3. PRINCIPLE OF STITCH RADIOGRAPHY

Core Concept:

Step-by-Step Process:

STEP 1: Patient positioned → does NOT move throughout entire examination
           ↓
STEP 2: First X-ray field captured (e.g., cervical + upper thoracic spine)
           ↓
STEP 3: X-ray tube/detector shifts to next position (patient stationary)
           ↓
STEP 4: Second X-ray field captured — with deliberate overlap of ~10–15%
           ↓
STEP 5: Repeat for 3rd field if needed (e.g., lumbar + pelvis)
           ↓
STEP 6: Dedicated software identifies common anatomical landmarks in overlap zones
           ↓
STEP 7: Software aligns and blends all fields → seamless composite image
           ↓
FINAL: Single long-format image on workstation/PACS for measurement

The Overlap Zone — Critical Principle:

• Each adjacent field must overlap by 10–15% (approximately 4–6 cm)
• The overlap region contains identical anatomy visible in both images
• Software uses this shared anatomy as registration/reference points to align the two fields precisely
• Poor overlap → misalignment ("stitching artifact") → distorted measurements

Key Physical Principle — Geometric Magnification Control:

• The X-ray tube is kept at a standardized focus-to-detector distance (FDD) — usually 150–180 cm
• Longer FDD reduces geometric magnification distortion
• Same FDD for all exposures ensures consistent magnification factor across all fields
• A calibration marker (metal ball of known diameter) is placed at the level of the hips to calculate the exact magnification factor for length measurements

---

Diagram for Notebook:

---

4. INDICATIONS

A. Spinal Indications (Most Common)

1. Scoliosis — measurement and monitoring of Cobb angle (most important indication)
2. Kyphosis — measurement of thoracic kyphosis angle
3. Spondylolisthesis — full spinal alignment assessment
4. Spinal deformity pre/post surgery — evaluation of correction achieved
5. Spinal fusion surgery planning — assessment of global spinal balance
6. Sagittal imbalance assessment — SVA (Sagittal Vertical Axis) measurement
7. Degenerative disc disease — overall spinal alignment
8. Congenital spine deformity — monitoring in children

B. Lower Limb Indications

1. Leg length discrepancy (LLD) — accurate measurement of femoral and tibial lengths
2. Lower limb alignment — Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) mechanical axis assessment
3. Varus/valgus deformity — genu varum (bow legs) / genu valgum (knock knees)
4. Pre-operative planning for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) — mechanical axis calculation
5. High tibial osteotomy (HTO) planning — correction angle calculation
6. Post-operative assessment — alignment after osteotomy or joint replacement
7. Perthes disease / DDH — lower limb development monitoring

C. Other Indications

1. Full-body weight-bearing assessment — global posture and alignment
2. Limb lengthening (Ilizarov/fixator) — monitoring lengthening progress
3. Soft tissue sarcoma — extent of long bone involvement
4. Skeletal dysplasias — full-body skeletal survey

---

5. METHODS / TECHNIQUES OF STITCH RADIOGRAPHY

Method 1: Single Long Cassette (Conventional Method)

Method 2: Multiple Exposure Digital Stitching ⭐ (Most Common Modern Method)

Sub-variants:

• Motorized Bucky / Moving Detector: detector moves automatically on a motorized track while tube shifts correspondingly
• Fixed Detector, Moving Tube: only the X-ray tube shifts to the next field position

Method 3: EOS Slot-Scan System (Most Advanced)

---

6. TECHNICAL PARAMETERS

Exposure Factors

Critical Technical Requirements:

1. Patient must be absolutely still between exposures — any movement causes misalignment
2. Consistent FDD across all exposures — ensures uniform magnification
3. Calibration marker placement — essential for accurate length measurement
4. Beam centering — central ray must be perpendicular to detector for each exposure
5. Overlap zone — 10–15%, never less than 3 cm
6. No rotation — patient position must not change between exposures

---

7. PATIENT POSITIONING TECHNIQUES

A. Spinal Stitch Radiography

• In PA position, the spine is closer to the detector → less magnification, sharper image
• Reduces radiation dose to radiosensitive anterior structures (thyroid, breast, gonads)
• PA = standard for scoliosis monitoring (Nash-Moe protocol)

• Patient stands straight, weight equally distributed on both feet
• No shoes with heels — bare feet or flat shoes
• Knees extended (full extension)
• For scoliosis: hands resting on supports at shoulder height
• Reference markers placed on posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) or femoral heads

• Average adult: 2 fields (upper: skull/C-spine → T12; lower: T10/L1 → sacrum/pelvis)
• Taller patients: 3 fields (cervical, thoracic, lumbar-pelvis)
• Generous overlap at each junction (~T6–T8 region)

B. Lower Limb Stitch Radiography

• From femoral heads to ankle mortice (some protocols include pelvis to feet)
• Typically 2 exposures: upper (pelvis to mid-tibia) + lower (mid-femur to ankle)
• Overlap at knee level

C. Upper Limb Stitch Radiography

• Less common; used for limb lengthening assessment
• Patient seated or standing; arm fully extended against detector
• AP or lateral view

---

8. DIGITAL STITCHING PROCESS — SOFTWARE WORKFLOW

Automatic Stitching Algorithm:

1. Input: 2–4 separate digital radiographic fields
2. Overlap detection: Software identifies the overlapping region in adjacent images
3. Feature matching: Identifies matching anatomical landmarks (vertebral endplates, cortical bone edges, disc spaces) in the overlap zone
4. Geometric correction: Corrects for any minor parallax distortion or magnification differences
5. Image blending: Overlap zone is blended (feathering algorithm) — eliminates visible seam
6. Concatenation: Fields joined into a single long-format image
7. Output: Single composite image available for measurement tools

Types of Stitching Errors (Artifacts):

---

9. MEASUREMENTS PERFORMED ON STITCH RADIOGRAPHS

A. Spinal Measurements

B. Lower Limb Measurements

---

10. CLINICAL APPLICATIONS IN DETAIL

A. Scoliosis Management

• Initial diagnosis: full-spine PA + lateral stitch radiograph
• Monitoring: serial Cobb angle measurement (treatment threshold: >10° = scoliosis; >25° = bracing; >45° = surgery)
• Brace effectiveness: comparing Cobb angle in/out of brace
• Post-surgical evaluation: instrumented correction assessment

B. Preoperative TKA Planning

• Full lower limb stitch required for:
  • Measuring mechanical axis (Hip-Knee-Ankle angle)
  • Planning component alignment to restore neutral mechanical axis
  • Calculating required tibial/femoral resection angles
• Without correct mechanical axis data → TKA component malalignment → early failure

C. High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO)

• Required to determine varus correction angle
• Calculates Fujisawa point (target for weight-bearing line post-correction)
• Post-operative: verifies achieved correction

D. Limb Length Discrepancy

• Scanogram (orthoroentgenogram): 3 separate exposures — hip, knee, ankle with ruler
• Modern stitch replaces traditional scanogram
• Determines which bone is short (femur vs tibia) and by how much

E. Spinal Surgery Planning (Adult Deformity)

• EOS / stitch radiograph provides spinopelvic parameters
• Global sagittal alignment (PI-LL mismatch)
• Helps surgeon select levels for fusion and required lordosis correction

---

11. RADIATION DOSE CONSIDERATIONS

• PA (not AP) projection for spine — reduces breast/thyroid dose
• Tight collimation
• AEC (automatic exposure control)
• EOS system for children and repeated monitoring (scoliosis)

Note: In scoliosis patients who require serial monitoring over years, dose reduction is critically important — especially for young females at risk for breast radiation. EOS is preferred.

---

12. ADVANTAGES OF STITCH RADIOGRAPHY

1. Comprehensive anatomical coverage in a single composite view — whole spine or full limb
2. Weight-bearing images — physiological loading position (gravity effect on alignment)
3. Accurate global measurements — Cobb angle, mechanical axis, leg length
4. Surgical planning — cannot be replaced by non-weight-bearing MRI/CT for alignment
5. Serial monitoring — standardized, reproducible technique
6. No special cassette needed (digital stitching uses standard detectors)
7. Widely available — standard DR equipment with stitching software
8. Non-invasive, fast — ~5 minutes total examination time

---

13. LIMITATIONS / DISADVANTAGES

1. Patient must remain absolutely still — any movement = stitching artifact
2. Stitching artifacts — step artifact can mimic or mask scoliosis
3. Magnification — must be corrected with calibration ball; errors in length if calibration omitted
4. Parallax distortion — lateral edges of each field have geometric distortion
5. Radiation dose — higher than single-field imaging; concern in pediatric scoliosis
6. Not real-time — cannot assess dynamic instability
7. Overlying soft tissue/bowel gas — can obscure spinal detail in abdominal region
8. Positioning errors — rotation of patient between shots = false measurement
9. Cost of specialized software — auto-stitching requires dedicated workstation/software

---

14. COMPARISON: STITCH RADIOGRAPHY vs EOS vs CT

---

15. IMAGES

---

---

16. KEY EXAM POINTS TO REMEMBER

---