How to write topic name in case paper presentation in topic of WOUND GAP IN SKIN CLOSURE AFTER CAESAREAN SECTION: SUBCUTICULAR VICRYL VS. VERTICAL MATTRESS ETHILON
Wound Gap in Skin Closure After Caesarean Section
Subcuticular Vicryl vs. Vertical Mattress Ethilon
Wound Gap in Skin Closure After Caesarean Section: Subcuticular Vicryl vs. Vertical Mattress Ethilon
| Element | Guideline |
|---|---|
| Case | Title Case — capitalize the first letter of each major word |
| Colon (:) | Separates the main topic from the subtitle/comparison |
| Abbreviations | Use as-is if widely recognized (e.g., Vicryl, Ethilon are brand names — keep as written) |
| "vs." | Written in lowercase; acceptable in academic titles |
| Font | Bold, typically 14–16 pt for slide heading |
| Acronyms | If using, define in parentheses on first slide, e.g., LSCS |
Wound Gap in Skin Closure After Caesarean Section: Subcuticular Vicryl vs. Vertical Mattress Ethilon
A Comparative Study of Wound Gap in Skin Closure After Caesarean Section: Subcuticular Vicryl vs. Vertical Mattress Ethilon
Subcuticular Vicryl vs. Vertical Mattress Ethilon in Skin Closure After Caesarean Section: A Wound Gap Analysis
────────────────────────────────────────────────
WOUND GAP IN SKIN CLOSURE AFTER CAESAREAN SECTION:
SUBCUTICULAR VICRYL VS. VERTICAL MATTRESS ETHILON
────────────────────────────────────────────────
Presented by: Dr. [Your Name]
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
[Institution Name]
[Date / Conference Name]
────────────────────────────────────────────────
Tip: For slide titles, ALL CAPS is acceptable and visually impactful. For written papers/abstracts, use Title Case.
WOUND GAP IN SKIN CLOSURE AFTER CAESAREAN SECTION: SUBCUTICULAR VICRYL VS. VERTICAL MATTRESS ETHILON
wound gap skin closure caesarean section subcuticular suture
subcuticular Vicryl vs vertical mattress Ethilon skin closure comparison
caesarean section wound complications healing dehiscence
suture techniques skin closure wound healing absorbable monofilament
vertical mattress suture technique wound eversion tension
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Study Design | Prospective Comparative Study |
| Study Site | Dept. of Obstetrics & Gynaecology |
| Sample Size | [e.g., 100 cases — 50 per group] |
| Inclusion Criteria | Full-term LSCS (elective & emergency), Pfannenstiel incision |
| Exclusion Criteria | Diabetes, obesity (BMI >35), immunosuppression, infected wounds, re-do LSCS with heavily scarred skin |
| Group A | Subcuticular closure with 2-0 Vicryl (Polyglactin 910, absorbable) |
| Group B | Vertical mattress closure with 2-0 Ethilon (Nylon, non-absorbable) |
| Follow-up | Day 3, Day 7, Day 30 post-op |
According to Bailey & Love's Short Practice of Surgery (p. 128): "Mattress sutures may be either vertical or horizontal and tend to be used to produce either eversion or inversion of a wound edge... very useful in producing accurate approximation of wound edges, especially when the edges to be anastomosed are irregular in depth or disposition."
According to Bailey & Love's (p. 57): "Subcuticular suturing avoids skin suture marks. If skin sutures are used, suture marks may be minimised by using monofilament sutures that are removed in a timely fashion."
| Outcome | Group A (Subcuticular Vicryl) | Group B (Vertical Mattress Ethilon) |
|---|---|---|
| Wound Gap / Dehiscence | Lower incidence | Higher if tension present |
| Wound Infection | Comparable | Risk of stitch abscess |
| Cosmetic Outcome | Superior (no marks) | Suture marks possible |
| Patient Comfort | Better (no removal needed) | Discomfort at removal |
| Healing Time | Faster perceived | Removal at Day 7–10 |
| Wound Eversion | Moderate | Excellent |
| Scar Quality | Thin, flat scar | May have stitch marks |
Presentation Tip: Structure your slides as: Title → Introduction → Aims → Materials & Methods → Results (with bar charts/tables) → Discussion → Conclusion → References. Keep each slide to one key point with visuals where possible.