attachment
attachment
attachment
attachment

Interpret the ecg based on the leads

Reading Document
Medical Text Search

ECG interpretation QTc prolongation normal sinus rhythm inferior lead abnormality

Medical Image Search

normal sinus rhythm ECG 12 lead interpretation QT interval

GradeResponse
GradeResponse
Here is a thorough interpretation of this ECG based on the measurements, computer analysis, and visible lead morphology.

ECG Interpretation

Date/Time: 21-03-2026, 22:33:19 Machine: AC50 EMG ADS Speed/Gain: 25 mm/s | 10 mm/mV

Measured Intervals & Parameters

ParameterValueNormal Range
Ventricular Rate89 BPM60–100 BPM ✅
PR Interval161 ms (range 102–191)120–200 ms ✅
P/QRS/T Interval99 ms<120 ms ✅
QT Interval368 msRate-dependent
QTc (corrected)448 ms<440 ms (M) / <460 ms (F) ⚠️
QRS/T Axis37–41°0–90° ✅ Normal axis
RV1/SV5 Amp0.07 / 0.39 mV
RV5/SV1 Amp1.31 / 0.66 mV
V2.33 referencenoted

Computer-Generated Interpretation

The machine flagged three findings:
  1. 800 — Normal Sinus Rhythm
  2. 752 — Inferior Abnormal QK (< 18 years)
  3. Borderline Abnormal ECG ⚠️ (Unconfirmed — needs physician review)

Lead-by-Lead Analysis (from visible tracings)

Limb Leads (I, II, III, aVR, aVL, aVF):
  • Lead II & III: Upright P waves confirm sinus rhythm. QRS complexes are narrow and regular. The "inferior abnormal QK" flag likely refers to a Q wave pattern in the inferior leads (II, III, aVF) that the machine considers abnormal for a patient under 18.
  • aVR: Expected negative QRS deflection — consistent with normal axis.
  • aVL: Small or biphasic QRS expected given the axis ~37–41°.
  • aVF: Upright — consistent with normal inferior axis.
Precordial Leads (V1–V6):
  • V1: rS pattern visible — normal for V1.
  • V2–V3: Transitional zone morphology, prominent positive deflections visible — may represent early transition.
  • V4–V5: Tall R waves; RV5/SV1 ratio of 1.31/0.66 mV — within normal limits, no LVH criteria met by voltage alone.
  • V6: Upright QRS, normal lateral morphology.
  • No obvious ST elevation or depression noted across the precordial leads.
  • T waves appear upright in lateral leads.

Key Findings & Clinical Significance

FindingSignificance
Normal sinus rhythm at 89 BPMReassuring
PR 161 msNormal; no first-degree AV block
QRS 99 msNarrow; no bundle branch block
QTc 448 msBorderline prolonged (upper limit of normal is 440 ms in males; 460 ms in females). In a patient <18 years, this warrants attention.
Normal QRS axis (37–41°)No axis deviation
Inferior Q waves (code 752)Machine-flagged as abnormal for age <18 — may reflect positional/physiologic Q waves or early inferior pathology; needs clinical correlation
No ST-segment changes visibleNo acute ischemic pattern

Summary & Recommendations

This ECG shows a normal sinus rhythm at 89 BPM with borderline QTc prolongation (448 ms). The key concern flagged by the machine is:
  1. QTc 448 ms — borderline prolonged. In a patient under 18 years, QTc >440 ms raises consideration of congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS), drug-induced QTc prolongation, or electrolyte abnormalities (hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hypocalcemia).
  2. Inferior Q wave abnormality (code 752) — physiologic Q waves in inferior leads are common in young patients, but the machine flagged this as abnormal for age. Clinical correlation is essential.
Important: The machine explicitly states "Unconfirmed Report — Need to Review." This ECG must be reviewed and interpreted by a qualified physician or cardiologist, especially given the patient's age (<18 years), borderline QTc, and the inferior lead abnormality flag. A clinical history, medication review, and electrolyte panel would be appropriate next steps.

But the patient is more than 45 years

Good context. That changes the interpretation of the machine's age-flag. Let me re-analyze with that in mind.

Revised ECG Interpretation (Patient >45 Years)


Re-evaluation of Machine Flags in Context

The machine flagged "752 Inferior Abnormal QK (<18 Year)" — this flag was generated because the machine likely did not have the patient's age entered, so it defaulted to a pediatric reference range. For a patient >45 years, this specific flag is not clinically applicable.

Parameters Re-assessed for Adult (>45 years)

ParameterValueAdult NormalAssessment
Ventricular Rate89 BPM60–100✅ Normal
PR Interval161 ms120–200 ms✅ Normal
QRS Duration99 ms<120 ms✅ Narrow, no BBB
QT Interval368 msRate-dependent
QTc448 ms<440 ms (M) / <460 ms (F)⚠️ Borderline (male) / ✅ Normal (female)
QRS Axis37–41°-30° to +90°✅ Normal axis
RV5/SV11.31 / 0.66 mV<3.5 mV (Sokolow)✅ No LVH by voltage

Critical Re-interpretation: Inferior Q Waves in a >45-Year-Old

In an adult over 45, Q waves in the inferior leads (II, III, aVF) carry a very different clinical weight compared to a child:
PossibilityClinical Significance
Old inferior MIQ waves in II, III, aVF in this age group raise concern for prior inferior myocardial infarction (RCA or LCx territory)
Physiologic Q wavesSmall narrow Q waves in III and aVL can be normal, but machine-flagged "abnormal" pattern is more concerning at this age
Left posterior fascicular blockCan produce inferior Q-wave pattern
This is the most important finding to pursue in this age group. Inferior Q waves in a >45-year-old should be correlated with:
  • Symptoms (chest pain, dyspnea, prior cardiac history)
  • Previous ECGs for comparison
  • Cardiac biomarkers (Troponin, CK-MB) if any acute presentation
  • Echocardiogram to assess inferior wall motion

QTc 448 ms in a >45-Year-Old

  • In males >45: QTc 448 ms is mildly prolonged (normal <440 ms)
  • In females >45: QTc 448 ms is within normal limits (<460 ms)
  • Causes to consider at this age:
    • Medications (antiarrhythmics, antipsychotics, antibiotics like azithromycin)
    • Electrolyte imbalance (hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia)
    • Structural heart disease
    • Hypothyroidism

Revised Summary

FindingRevised Significance for >45 years
Normal sinus rhythm, 89 BPMReassuring
Narrow QRS, normal axisNo conduction defect
Inferior Q waves (II, III, aVF)Must rule out old/silent inferior MI — highest priority
QTc 448 msBorderline (males) — check medications and electrolytes
No acute ST changes visibleNo obvious ongoing ischemia on this tracing

Recommended Next Steps

  1. Compare with prior ECGs — are these Q waves new or old?
  2. Cardiac biomarkers (Troponin) if any symptoms present
  3. Echocardiogram — assess inferior wall motion abnormality
  4. Electrolyte panel — K⁺, Mg²⁺, Ca²⁺ (for QTc)
  5. Medication review — any QT-prolonging drugs?
  6. Cardiology referral if Q waves are new or patient is symptomatic
The "Unconfirmed — Need to Review" note from the machine still stands. A qualified physician must review this ECG in full clinical context.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.