Prophylactic anti epileptic in hemorrhagic stroke
prophylactic antiepileptic drugs intracerebral hemorrhage
PMID: 39707127
PMID: 36337029
PMID: 34286461
"We suggest avoidance of prophylactic ASM in hospitalized adult patients with acute nontraumatic ICH." (Weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence)
| Question | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Which agent? | Levetiracetam (LEV) preferred over phenytoin/fosphenytoin (PHT/fPHT) (weak recommendation, very low evidence) |
| How long? | Short duration ≤7 days preferred over >7 days (weak recommendation, very low evidence) |
| Scenario | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Routine ASM prophylaxis in ICH | Not recommended |
| Drug of choice if ASM used | Levetiracetam |
| Duration if ASM used | ≤7 days |
| Phenytoin/fosphenytoin | Avoid (worse functional outcomes) |
| Treating actual seizures | Benzodiazepine → LEV/valproate |
Dose of levetiracetam
| Indication | Dose | Route | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epilepsy (maintenance) | Start 500–1000 mg/day; ↑ by 1000 mg every 2–4 weeks | PO (BD) | Max 3000 mg/day (1500 mg BD) |
| ICH seizure prophylaxis (if used) | 500 mg BD × ≤7 days | PO/IV | Adjust for renal function |
| Status epilepticus (loading) | 20–60 mg/kg IV | IV | Up to max ~4500 mg (Rosen's uses 60 mg/kg max 4500 mg) |
| Status epilepticus (maintenance) | 1000–1500 mg BD | IV/PO | Switch to oral when possible |
| CrCl (mL/min) | Dose Adjustment |
|---|---|
| >80 | No change |
| 50–80 | 500–1000 mg BD |
| 30–50 | 250–750 mg BD |
| <30 | 250–500 mg BD |
| Dialysis | Supplemental dose after HD |
Bp control in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke
blood pressure management ischemic stroke guidelines
blood pressure reduction intracerebral hemorrhage
PMID: 40739079
| Clinical Scenario | SBP Target | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Not eligible for thrombolysis/thrombectomy | >220 systolic OR >120 diastolic | Treat only if exceeds these thresholds; reduce by 10–15% initially |
| Eligible for IV thrombolysis (tPA) | Must be <185/110 before giving tPA | Aggressively treat to reach this threshold |
| After IV tPA | Maintain <180/105 for ≥24 hours | Strict control to prevent hemorrhagic transformation |
| After mechanical thrombectomy | <180/105 | Maintain post-procedure |
| DBP >140 mmHg (any situation) | Use IV sodium nitroprusside | Special consideration |
| Scenario | BP Target |
|---|---|
| ICH, SBP 150–220 mmHg, mild–moderate volume (6–19 mL) | Target SBP 140 mmHg |
| ICH, SBP >220 mmHg | Aggressive IV reduction, target SBP 140–180 |
| ICH, very intensive: SBP 110–139 | Not recommended — no added benefit, increased renal adverse events |
| SAH (pre-aneurysm treatment) | SBP <160 mmHg |
| SAH (post-aneurysm treatment) | Do not lower BP |
| Trial | Target | Patients | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| INTERACT 2 | SBP <140 vs <180 | 2839 | No significant reduction in death/severe disability; improved functional outcomes on ordinal mRS analysis |
| ATACH 2 | SBP 110–140 vs 140–179 | 1000 | Intensive group had higher renal adverse events, no benefit |
| 2025 Meta-analysis (Reginato et al.) | <140 vs standard | 13,625 (11 RCTs) | Intensive lowering: ↓ poor outcome (mRS 3–6), ↓ mortality, ↓ hematoma enlargement |
| Feature | Ischemic Stroke (no thrombolysis) | Ischemic Stroke (+ tPA) | Hemorrhagic Stroke (ICH) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permissive threshold | >220/120 | >185/110 | Treat if >150 |
| Target | Reduce by 10–15% only | <180/105 after tPA | SBP 140 mmHg |
| Aggressive lowering | Harmful (penumbra) | Required | Beneficial |
| Preferred agent | Labetalol, nicardipine | Labetalol, nicardipine | Nicardipine, labetalol |
| Avoid | Over-lowering | Uncontrolled BP | SBP <110 (renal risk) |
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
idiopathic intracranial hypertension management
Carotid stenosis and treatment
carotid stenosis treatment endarterectomy stenting
| Modality | Role |
|---|---|
| Doppler Ultrasound (DUS) | First-line; sensitivity >90%, specificity >85% for >50% stenosis; cost-effective, no radiation |
| CTA / MRA | Second-line; used when DUS findings are discordant or anatomy is complex |
| Catheter angiography | Reserved as problem-solving tool only; 1% periprocedural stroke risk |
| Grade | % Stenosis |
|---|---|
| Mild | <50% |
| Moderate | 50–69% |
| Severe | 70–99% |
| Occlusion | 100% |
| Stenosis | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| 70–99% | CEA strongly recommended (NASCET, ECST) — major absolute risk reduction |
| 50–69% | CEA beneficial; benefit is modest and depends on patient risk profile |
| <50% | No benefit from surgery; medical therapy alone |
| Stenosis | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| >70% | CEA reasonable if perioperative risk of stroke/MI/death is <3% (AHA/ASA) — but benefit over modern GDMT is uncertain |
| 50–70% | Medical therapy preferred |
| Feature | CEA | CAS |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of care | Yes — well-established | Alternative in selected patients |
| Periprocedural stroke risk | Lower (CREST: 2.3%) | Higher (CREST: 4.3%) |
| Periprocedural MI risk | Higher (CREST: 2.3%) | Lower (CREST: 1.1%) |
| Age preference | Preferred in older patients (>70 yrs) | Better tolerated in younger patients |
| 4-year composite (CREST) | 6.8% | 7.2% (non-inferior) |
| Trial | Finding |
|---|---|
| SAPPHIRE | CAS non-inferior to CEA in high-surgical-risk patients |
| SPACE / EVA-3S (European) | CAS inferior to CEA; controversial due to operator experience issues |
| CREST | No significant difference in composite stroke/MI/death at 4 years; CAS had more strokes, CEA had more MIs |
| ICSS (European) | 30-day stroke risk higher with CAS |
Symptomatic + 70–99% stenosis → CEA (within 2 weeks)
Symptomatic + 50–69% stenosis → CEA (if perioperative risk <6%)
Symptomatic + <50% stenosis → Medical therapy only
Asymptomatic + >70% stenosis → GDMT ± CEA if periop risk <3%
High surgical risk (any) → Consider CAS or TCAR

CAS
3 percent ns in suspected csvt in a 13 yr old with intellectual disability
cerebral sinovenous thrombosis children management anticoagulation
hypertonic saline cerebral venous thrombosis intracranial hypertension
| Intervention | Comment |
|---|---|
| Head elevation (30°) | First-line, always |
| Hypertonic saline / mannitol | For acute ICP crises — short-term bridging only |
| Acetazolamide | Reduces CSF production; used in chronic ICP elevation in CSVT |
| Lumbar puncture / CSF drainage | Both diagnostic and therapeutic in CSVT with isolated ICP |
| Anticoagulation (LMWH/UFH) | Definitive treatment — does NOT worsen hemorrhage risk |
"Treatment must be individualized, but anticoagulation is the cornerstone to prevent progression of thrombosis even in the presence of intracranial hemorrhage. Additional treatment should be directed at the management of secondary effects such as elevated ICP." — Plum & Posner's Diagnosis and Treatment of Stupor and Coma
| Route | Dose |
|---|---|
| Bolus (acute ICP crisis) | 2–5 mL/kg IV over 10–20 minutes; some sources up to 6.5–10 mL/kg |
| Continuous infusion | 0.1–1.0 mL/kg/hour titrated to ICP response |
| Maximum single dose | 500 mL |
Clinical pearl: In a non-verbal or minimally verbal child with ID, do not wait for the classic triad of raised ICP. Act on behavioral change + fundoscopy findings + imaging.
Suspected CSVT + raised ICP signs in 13-yr-old with ID
│
├─ Secure airway/IV access
├─ Urgent MRI-MRV or CT-venography
├─ Head of bed 30°, avoid hypotonic fluids
│
├─ ICP crisis present (GCS drop, herniation signs)?
│ YES → 3% NaCl 2–5 mL/kg IV bolus over 15–20 min
│ Monitor Na+, osmolality; repeat if needed
│ Avoid mannitol (worsens dehydration → propagates CSVT)
│
├─ Start anticoagulation (LMWH preferred) — do NOT delay
│ Even if hemorrhagic infarct present
│
├─ Seizure? → Treat with LEV (preferred)
│ No routine prophylaxis
│
└─ Acetazolamide for chronic ICP elevation (post-acute phase)
From Victor and Adams