I am very new fetal medicine fellow and i need to learn scanning but there are less chances so any other way? Like a game any exercise or anything for stable hand
ultrasound scanning simulation training fetal medicine fellows games exercises hand stability
ultrasound simulator for fetal medicine training 2024 2025
Important questions asked in fetal medicine exam by icog
ICOG fetal medicine fellowship exam important questions syllabus India
https://icogonline.org/index.html@p=42
| Condition | Key Features to Know |
|---|---|
| Trisomy 21 (Down) | NT↑, nasal bone absent, short femur/humerus, echogenic bowel, EIF, DS markers |
| Trisomy 18 (Edwards) | Choroid plexus cysts, overlapping fingers, strawberry skull, AVSD, IUGR |
| Trisomy 13 (Patau) | Holoprosencephaly, proboscis, facial clefts, polydactyly, cardiac defects |
| Turner (45X) | Cystic hygroma, hydrops, coarctation, horseshoe kidney |
| Triploidy | Partial mole, severe IUGR, large placenta, skin syndactyly |
Make a visual poster comparing trisomies 13, 18, and 21 key features
A clean, professional medical education poster comparing Trisomy 13 (Patau syndrome), Trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome), and Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome). The poster has a dark navy blue background with three side-by-side columns, one for each trisomy, each with a distinct color header: red for Trisomy 13, orange for Trisomy 18, and blue for Trisomy 21. Each column includes the chromosome number prominently at the top, the syndrome name below it, and then clearly organized sections with icons or bullet points covering: Incidence/prevalence, Key facial features, CNS findings, Cardiac defects, Limb/skeletal findings, Other organ anomalies, Ultrasound soft markers, Survival/prognosis. Use medical illustration style with small anatomical icons next to each finding. Include a title at the top: "Autosomal Trisomies - Key Features Comparison". The layout is clean, easy to read, suitable for a fetal medicine study poster. White text on colored backgrounds for headings, light gray text for bullet points.

| Feature | Trisomy 13 (Patau) | Trisomy 18 (Edwards) | Trisomy 21 (Down) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incidence | 1 in 10,000 | 1 in 6,000 | 1 in 700 |
| Face | Holoprosencephaly, proboscis, cyclopia, midline cleft lip/palate | Micrognathia, low-set ears, small mouth | Flat face, upslanting palpebral fissures, epicanthic folds, small ears |
| Brain/CNS | Holoprosencephaly, neural tube defects | Choroid plexus cysts, strawberry skull, SNHL | Mild ventriculomegaly, hypotonia |
| Heart | VSD, ASD, PDA, DORV | VSD, ASD, PDA, AVSD | AVSD (most specific), VSD, ASD |
| Hands/Limbs | Postaxial polydactyly, clubfoot | Overlapping fingers (index over 3rd), rocker bottom feet, short limbs | Short femur/humerus, single palmar crease |
| Other organs | Renal dysplasia, omphalocele | Omphalocele, renal anomalies, IUGR | Echogenic bowel, duodenal atresia ("double bubble"), EIF |
| Key US markers | Midline defects, polydactyly, heart | CPC, overlapping fingers, IUGR, heart | NT ↑, absent nasal bone, short nasal bone, EIF, soft markers |
| Prognosis | Median survival days-weeks; 90% die in 1st year | Median survival days-weeks; 5-10% survive 1 year | Variable; life expectancy ~60 years with support |
Normal?
| Finding | What it means |
|---|---|
| Hyperplastic stratified squamous epithelium in endometrium | Squamous epithelium should NOT be in the endometrium - this is abnormal squamous metaplasia or extension from cervix |
| Koilocytotic changes | Koilocytes = hallmark of HPV infection. These are cells with perinuclear cytoplasmic clearing (halo), nuclear enlargement, hyperchromasia, and irregular nuclear membranes. They are the microscopic signature of active HPV (Berek & Novak's Gynecology) |
| Few endometrial glands | The sample is fragmented and poorly representative |
| Advice: repeat biopsy | The pathologist is NOT satisfied - this sample is inadequate to fully characterize the lesion |
This report shows HPV-associated koilocytotic changes with squamous epithelium where it should not be, in a 61-year-old postmenopausal woman. This is not normal, the sample is inadequate to characterize fully, and the pathologist has correctly advised a repeat biopsy. This woman needs urgent gynae-oncology review. Do not delay.