Orris
attachment
attachment
attachment
attachment

Which one do you think i should study?

Both guides cover Arches of the Foot, but they serve different purposes. Here's a quick take:
  • Guide 1 (15-Mark Detailed / LAQ Structure) - exam-focused, dense, uses mnemonics like "STAPLES" and "SLINGS," better for writing long-answer questions
  • Guide 2 (Clean Structured Notes) - cleaner layout, has a summary comparison table, diagrams, and a mnemonic ("MLT"), better for understanding and revision
My recommendation: Study Guide 2 first, then use Guide 1 for exam practice.
Here's the reasoning:
  1. Guide 2 builds your foundation clearly - it defines each arch systematically, lists bones/pillars/keystones in a consistent format, includes a comparison table (great for quick recall), and labels diagrams well. It covers the Transverse Arch more explicitly, adds Hallux Valgus and Club Foot (Talipes) as clinical correlates, and is much easier to follow on a first pass.
  2. Guide 1 is best used after you understand the material. It's structured like an actual 15-mark answer - if your exam requires long-answer format (LAQ), practicing with Guide 1's layout will help you write complete, point-based answers. However, it has some typographical errors in the text (e.g., "Birobility," garbled sentences), so don't rely on it for exact wording.
In short: Guide 2 to learn → Guide 1 to write exam answers.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.