I now have comprehensive material from multiple textbooks. Let me compile the complete master guide.
OAE, ECoG, BERA/ABR, Decay Test & Speech Audiometry - Complete Master Guide
PART 1: OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS (OAE)
1. WHAT ARE OAEs?
OAEs are low-level sounds generated by the outer hair cells (OHCs) of the cochlea. The active motility of OHCs serves as a mechanical amplifier of the basilar membrane; OAEs are acoustic by-products of this OHC motility - detectable with a sensitive microphone in the sealed ear canal.
- OAEs are absent if OHCs are damaged (≥35-40 dB HL of cochlear hearing loss typically abolishes them)
- They test OHC integrity only - not inner hair cells, not auditory nerve, not brainstem
- They are objective - patient does not need to respond; unaffected by sedation, anesthesia, sleep, arousal, cognitive status, language
- They cannot be recorded if middle ear is abnormal (fluid, perforation → check tympanogram first)
Key rule: OAE tests the cochlea (OHC side). ABR tests the nerve and brainstem. Together they localise lesions.
2. TYPES OF OAE
A. Spontaneous OAEs (SOAEs)
- Occur without any external stimulus
- Found in ~50-60% of normal-hearing ears
- Not used clinically (inconsistent)
B. Evoked OAEs (clinical use):
1. Transient Evoked OAEs (TEOAEs / click-evoked)
- Stimulus: Brief click or tone burst
- The cochlea produces a delayed "echo" after the click
- Response spans 0.4-6 kHz; latency 5-20 ms
- Used for: Newborn hearing screening, general OHC function assessment
- Readout: Waveform reproducibility (>70% acceptable) + amplitude (signal vs noise)
- Advantages: Fast, broadband frequency coverage
2. Distortion Product OAEs (DPOAEs)
- Stimulus: Two simultaneous pure tones (f1 and f2) at 55-85 dB SPL
- The nonlinear OHCs generate a distortion product at frequency: 2f₁ - f₂
(e.g., f₁ = 2000 Hz, f₂ = 2500 Hz → DPOAE at 1500 Hz)
- Ratio f₂/f₁ = 1.22 is optimal; f₂ level 10-15 dB lower than f₁
- The DPOAE amplitude is ~60 dB below the primary tone levels
- Used for: Frequency-specific OHC mapping, monitoring ototoxicity, monitoring noise exposure
- Displayed as a DP-gram (DPOAE amplitude vs frequency)
- Advantages: Frequency-specific - can track changes at specific cochlear regions
Figure: (A) TEOAE - click-evoked waveform with spectral analysis. (B) DPOAE gram - amplitude vs frequency for two trials, showing responses above the noise floor.
3. INTERPRETING OAEs
| Result | Meaning |
|---|
| OAEs present | OHCs functioning - hearing likely normal OR loss is retrocochlear |
| OAEs absent | OHC damage (SNHL ≥35-40 dB) OR middle ear problem |
| OAEs present + ABR absent | Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder (ANSD) - OHCs OK, nerve/inner hair cell damage |
Warning: Always pair with tympanometry. Middle ear effusion, perforation, or cerumen will suppress OAEs and give a false-negative result.
4. CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF OAEs
| Application | Type Used | Why |
|---|
| Newborn hearing screening | TEOAE (or ABR) | Fast, objective, no patient cooperation needed |
| Ototoxicity monitoring | DPOAE | Frequency-specific early detection before PTA changes |
| Noise-induced hearing loss monitoring | DPOAE | Tracks 4 kHz region |
| Differential: cochlear vs retrocochlear | TEOAE/DPOAE | Present OAEs with poor ABR = nerve problem |
| Malingering / non-organic hearing loss | TEOAE | Objective; if OAEs present, hearing is at least 35-40 dB HL |
| Acoustic neuroma | TEOAE | Presence of OAEs with poor ABR - cochlea preserved |
| ANSD diagnosis | TEOAE + ECoG | OAEs present, cochlear microphonic present, ABR absent |
5. FACTORS THAT AFFECT OAEs
Do NOT affect OAEs (important for exams):
- Sleep/arousal state
- Sedation or anesthesia
- Body position
- Motivation / cognitive status
- Language barriers
Do affect OAEs:
- Middle ear pathology (must have normal tympanogram)
- Degree of hearing loss (absent if >35-40 dB HL cochlear loss)
- Probe fit / cerumen
- Ambient noise in test room
PART 2: ELECTROCOCHLEOGRAPHY (ECoG / ECochG)
6. WHAT IS ECoG?
ECoG records neuroelectric events generated by the cochlea and auditory nerve in response to sound. It measures the earliest electrical responses - at the cochlear level.
Three components recorded:
| Component | Generator | What it reflects |
|---|
| CM (Cochlear Microphonic) | Outer hair cells | Mirrors the stimulus waveform; "follows" the sound like a microphone |
| SP (Summating Potential) | Inner hair cells + basilar membrane | DC shift; reflects basilar membrane displacement |
| AP (Action Potential) | Auditory nerve (CN VIII) | Same as Wave I of ABR; whole-nerve compound action potential |
7. ELECTRODES USED
| Electrode type | Placement | Signal Quality | Invasiveness |
|---|
| Transtympanic | Needle through TM onto promontory | Best (highest amplitude) | Invasive (needs LA) |
| TIPtrode | Gold foil in ear canal | Moderate | Non-invasive |
| Tymptrode | On surface of TM | Good | Minimal |
| Extratympanic | Ear canal wall | Least good | Non-invasive |
8. THE SP/AP RATIO - DIAGNOSTIC KEY
The main measurement in ECoG is the SP/AP ratio (or SP/AP amplitude percentage).
- Normal: SP is a small shoulder/deflection before the AP; ratio is low
- Endolymphatic hydrops (Meniere's disease): Basilar membrane is distorted → SP amplitude increases relative to AP → elevated SP/AP ratio
Abnormal thresholds (SP/AP ratio):
| Electrode | Abnormal Threshold |
|---|
| TIPtrode (ear canal) | >50% |
| Tymptrode (on TM) | >35% |
| Transtympanic | >30% |
Sensitivity for Meniere's: ~65-70%; false positive rate ~5%.
9. CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF ECoG
- Meniere's disease / endolymphatic hydrops - elevated SP/AP ratio (primary use)
- Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder (ANSD) - CM present (OHCs intact) but AP/ABR absent (nerve dysfunction)
- Intraoperative monitoring of cochlear function
- Threshold estimation (largely replaced by ABR now)
- Enhancing Wave I of ABR when it is absent or difficult to identify (helps interpeak latency measurements)
- Acoustic neuroma detection (largely replaced by ABR + MRI)
PART 3: AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE (ABR / BERA)
(BERA = Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry - same test, different name used in UK/India)
10. WHAT IS ABR/BERA?
The ABR is a surface-recorded electrophysiological response representing the synchronized electrical activity of the auditory nerve and brainstem nuclei in response to sound.
- Objective test - requires no patient response
- NOT affected by: sedation, sleep, most anesthetics, drugs, arousal state
- IS affected by: body temperature (latencies change), sex (females have slightly shorter latencies), age, degree of hearing loss
- Stimulus: Click (100 µs rectangular pulse, broad spectrum, activates basal cochlea = 2000-4000 Hz region) or tone bursts for frequency-specific threshold testing
- Recording: Surface electrodes on forehead/vertex (non-inverting), earlobe/mastoid (inverting), forehead centre (ground)
- 1000-3000 sweeps are averaged to reduce noise
11. THE ABR WAVEFORM - WAVES I TO V
Normal ABR: Waves I, III, and V labelled. Two replicated traces overlying each other confirm validity. Wave V is the most prominent and robust peak.
Generator sites - Mnemonic: "EECOL" (from K.J. Lee)
| Wave | Generator | Latency (approx) |
|---|
| I | Distal CN VIII (cochlear nerve) | ~1.5 ms |
| II | Proximal CN VIII | ~2.5 ms |
| III | Cochlear nucleus (ipsilateral) | ~3.5 ms |
| IV | Superior olivary complex | ~4.5 ms |
| V | Lateral lemniscus / inferior colliculus | ~5.5 ms |
Wave V is most robust - persists at low stimulus levels and with significant hearing loss. Wave I is most affected by peripheral hearing loss.
12. NORMAL INTERPEAK LATENCIES (CRITICAL NUMBERS)
| Interval | Normal Value | What it assesses |
|---|
| I-III | 2.3 ms | Cochlear nerve → cochlear nucleus (peripheral to low brainstem) |
| III-V | 2.1 ms | Cochlear nucleus → lateral lemniscus (brainstem) |
| I-V | 4.4 ms | Entire auditory nerve + brainstem pathway |
| Interaural Wave V latency difference | <0.2-0.4 ms | Symmetry of brainstem function |
Abnormal = any interpeak latency above these values, or interaural wave V difference >0.2-0.4 ms
13. ABR USES
A. Threshold ABR (Hearing Estimation)
- Click ABR correlates with pure-tone thresholds at 2000-4000 Hz
- Tone-burst ABR gives frequency-specific thresholds
- Used for: Newborns, uncooperative patients, malingering, medico-legal
- Wave V threshold correlates to behavioural threshold +10-15 dB (click-ABR)
B. Neurodiagnostic ABR (Retrocochlear screening)
- High stimulus level: 80-95 dB nHL
- Screens for acoustic neuroma / vestibular schwannoma and brainstem lesions
- Sensitivity for acoustic neuroma: >90% in older studies; modern MRI has largely replaced it but ABR used when MRI contraindicated
ABR abnormalities indicating retrocochlear pathology:
- I-V interpeak latency >4.4 ms
- I-III interpeak latency >2.3 ms
- III-V interpeak latency >2.1 ms
- Interaural wave V latency difference >0.2-0.4 ms
- Absent wave V with preserved wave I or III ← definitive sign
- Complete absence of ABR (if not explained by degree of hearing loss)
Left ear (L side): Note poorly formed, delayed waveform with no clear Wave V at 85 dB. Right ear (R side): Normal well-defined waves I, III, V. This pattern is characteristic of a left-sided acoustic neuroma.
C. Intraoperative monitoring
- Real-time monitoring during CPA surgery (acoustic neuroma resection, microvascular decompression)
- Changes in wave V latency or amplitude warn surgeon of traction on CN VIII
14. ABR IN AUDITORY NEUROPATHY SPECTRUM DISORDER (ANSD)
ANSD = normal OHC function (OAEs + cochlear microphonic present) but absent/abnormal ABR (inner hair cells or auditory nerve dysfunctional)
| Test | ANSD Result |
|---|
| OAEs | Present (OHCs intact) |
| Cochlear microphonic (ECoG) | Present |
| ABR | Absent or severely abnormal |
| PTA | Variable - mild to severe SNHL |
| Word recognition | Disproportionately poor |
Causes: neonatal jaundice, hypoxia, genetic (otoferlin mutations), auditory neuropathy
PART 4: THE DECAY TEST (Tone Decay Test)
15. WHAT IS TONE DECAY?
Tone decay tests measure auditory adaptation/fatigue - the ability to maintain perception of a continuous tone over time.
Principle: In a normal ear, a continuous tone just above threshold remains audible. In retrocochlear (nerve) pathology, the nerve fatigues rapidly and the tone seems to "fade" away, requiring progressive loudness increases to remain audible.
16. PERFORMING THE TEST
Method (Carhart/Rosenberg tone decay test):
- Present a continuous tone at 5 dB above threshold for 60 seconds
- Patient signals as long as they hear it
- If perception fades before 60 seconds, raise level by 5 dB
- Continue raising until audible for the full 60 seconds
- The total rise in dB above threshold = the decay value
17. INTERPRETING TONE DECAY
| Decay amount | Interpretation |
|---|
| 0-5 dB | Normal |
| 5-15 dB | Mild - can be cochlear or normal variant |
| ≥20-25 dB | Significant - retrocochlear pathology (CN VIII lesion) |
| ≥30 dB at any single frequency | Strongly suggestive of acoustic neuroma |
Acoustic reflex decay test (see previous guide) uses the same principle: reflex fades within 5-10 seconds at 10 dB above reflex threshold = retrocochlear.
Rollover on PIPB (Performance Intensity Function for PB words):
- As speech level increases, WRS normally improves then plateaus
- If WRS falls (rollover) at higher levels = retrocochlear lesion
- Retrocochlear lesions → "rollover phenomenon" - discrimination worsens at louder levels
Shambaugh: "Decay of the reflexive stiffening of the tympanic membrane to half-amplitude in 5 sec or less is suggestive of retrocochlear pathology."
Clinical note: Tone decay and stapedial reflex decay tests are now largely replaced by ABR + MRI for acoustic neuroma screening. They remain conceptually important and exam-relevant.
18. SUMMARY: COCHLEAR vs RETROCOCHLEAR DIFFERENTIATION
| Test | Cochlear Loss | Retrocochlear Loss |
|---|
| OAEs | Absent (OHC damage) | Present (cochlea intact) |
| Tone decay | Minimal (<15 dB) | Significant (≥20 dB) |
| Reflex decay | Normal (sustained) | Decay within 5 sec |
| ABR interpeak latency | Normal or mildly prolonged | Prolonged >4.4 ms I-V |
| Rollover (PIPB) | Absent | Present |
| Recruitment | Present | Absent |
| SISI score | High (>70%) | Low (<20%) |
| Word recognition (WRS) | Good (correlates with PTA) | Poor (disproportionately) |
PART 5: SPEECH AUDIOMETRY
19. WHAT IS SPEECH AUDIOMETRY?
Speech audiometry tests hearing for speech rather than pure tones. It assesses both the threshold for speech and the ability to understand speech at suprathreshold levels.
Tests pure-tone thresholds + functional speech understanding. Expressed as dB HL.
Preferred method: recorded speech (CD/digital) rather than monitored live voice (MLV), which is less reproducible.
20. COMPONENTS OF SPEECH AUDIOMETRY
A. Speech Awareness/Detection Threshold (SAT / SDT)
- Lowest level at which patient can detect the presence of speech (not identify it)
- Used when SRT cannot be obtained (children, language barriers, cognitive impairment)
- Should agree with the best pure-tone threshold within 10 dB anywhere on the audiogram (speech is a complex broad-band signal)
- Typically 5-10 dB better than SRT
B. Speech Recognition Threshold (SRT)
- Lowest level at which patient can correctly repeat spondee words in 50% of presentations
- Spondee = two-syllable compound word with equal stress on both syllables
- Examples: railroad, sidewalk, eardrum, baseball, hotdog, airplane, birthday
- Key relationship: SRT should be within ±10 dB of the PTA (500 + 1000 + 2000 Hz ÷ 3)
- If SRT and PTA disagree by >10 dB → consider non-organic hearing loss (malingering), or use 2-frequency best PTA for sloping audiograms
Uses of SRT:
- Confirms PTA accuracy
- Establishes reference point for WRS testing
- Detects non-organic hearing loss (functional/malingering)
C. Word Recognition Score (WRS) / Speech Discrimination Score (SDS)
(Older term: "speech discrimination")
- Percentage of phonetically balanced (PB) words correctly repeated
- Presented at 25-35 dB above SRT (sensation level) - this is the "most comfortable level" range
- Uses PB word lists (phonemes occur in same proportions as in natural English)
- UK/ENT: Often uses Phonetically Balanced (PB) or Consonant-Vowel-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word lists
WRS Score Interpretation (K.J. Lee):
| Score | Category |
|---|
| 90-100% | Normal |
| 76-88% | Slight difficulty |
| 60-74% | Moderate difficulty |
| 40-58% | Poor |
| ≤40% | Very poor |
Normal hearing and pure CHL: WRS typically 88-100% (middle ear problem doesn't affect cochlear discrimination)
Cochlear SNHL: Variable WRS - usually reduced in proportion to hearing loss
Retrocochlear / CN VIII lesion: WRS disproportionately poor relative to degree of PTA loss ("poor discrimination out of proportion to loss") + rollover phenomenon
21. THE SPEECH AUDIOGRAM AND ROLLOVER
Speech audiometry section of a complete audiogram report: SRT 5 dB both ears; right ear 100% WRS at 55 dB HL; left ear 92% WRS at 35 dB HL.
The PIPB (Performance Intensity Function for PB words) / Rollover:
- Normal pattern: WRS increases as presentation level increases, reaching a plateau (PB-MAX)
- Rollover pattern: WRS peaks then decreases at higher presentation levels
- Rollover index = (PB-MAX - PB-Min) ÷ PB-Max
- If rollover index >0.45 = suggestive of retrocochlear pathology
22. MOST COMFORTABLE LEVEL (MCL) & UNCOMFORTABLE LOUDNESS LEVEL (UCL)
- MCL (Most Comfortable Level): Intensity at which speech is most comfortably heard (~40-50 dB SL above SRT)
- UCL (Uncomfortable Loudness Level): Intensity at which sound is uncomfortably loud (~90-100 dB HL in normal ears)
- Dynamic Range = UCL - SRT: Normal = ~90 dB; Reduced in cochlear SNHL (loudness recruitment = UCL normal but SRT elevated → narrow dynamic range → important for hearing aid fitting)
23. SPEECH AUDIOMETRY IN SITE-OF-LESION TESTING
| Condition | SRT-PTA agreement | WRS | Rollover |
|---|
| Normal | Agrees (±10 dB) | 90-100% | None |
| Pure CHL | Agrees | Normal (88-100%) | None |
| Cochlear SNHL | Agrees | Reduced (correlates with loss) | Absent |
| Retrocochlear | May agree | Disproportionately poor | Present |
| Non-organic | Disagreement | Variable/inconsistent | - |
PART 6: THE COMPLETE TEST BATTERY - HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER
| Question | Test(s) |
|---|
| Is there hearing loss? | PTA audiogram |
| What type? (CHL / SNHL / Mixed) | PTA + tympanometry |
| Is cochlea (OHC) intact? | OAE |
| Is the nerve/brainstem intact? | ABR (BERA) |
| Is it cochlear or retrocochlear? | OAE + ABR + tone decay + reflex decay + WRS |
| Is it Meniere's / endolymphatic hydrops? | ECoG (SP/AP ratio) |
| How well does patient understand speech? | WRS / speech audiometry |
| Newborn screening? | OAE (TEOAE) or ABR |
| Auditory neuropathy? | OAE present + ABR absent |
| Acoustic neuroma screening? | ABR → if abnormal → MRI |
| Malingering / non-organic? | OAE, ABR, SRT-PTA disagreement |
KEY NUMBERS TO MEMORISE
| Number | Meaning |
|---|
| 35-40 dB HL | OAEs absent above this cochlear loss |
| 2f₁-f₂ | DPOAE frequency formula |
| SP/AP >50% (TIPtrode) | Abnormal ECoG (Meniere's) |
| SP/AP >35% (Tymptrode) | Abnormal ECoG |
| SP/AP >30% (Transtympanic) | Abnormal ECoG |
| I-III: 2.3 ms | Normal ABR interpeak latency |
| III-V: 2.1 ms | Normal ABR interpeak latency |
| I-V: 4.4 ms | Normal ABR interpeak latency |
| Interaural Wave V: <0.2-0.4 ms | Normal asymmetry |
| SRT within ±10 dB of PTA | Normal agreement (confirms PTA) |
| 25-35 dB above SRT | Level for WRS testing |
| WRS 90-100% | Normal discrimination |
| Rollover index >0.45 | Retrocochlear suspect |
| Tone decay ≥20 dB | Retrocochlear suspect |
| Reflex decay >50% in 5-10 sec | Retrocochlear suspect |
Sources: Cummings Otolaryngology (Ch. 134); Scott-Brown's Vol. 2 (Ch. 51); K.J. Lee's Essential Otolaryngology (Ch. 14); Shambaugh Surgery of the Ear; Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine 22e