I now have all the data needed for a thorough analysis. Here is the complete urodynamic interpretation:
Urodynamic Pressure-Flow Study - Analysis & Comments
Patient: Sharma, Kalpana | Female | 40 years | Date: 06/07/2026
Investigator: Dr. Ajay Bhandarkar, Sujay Urological Hospital
1. FILLING PHASE ANALYSIS
Bladder Sensation - Normal
| Event | Volume (ml) | Comment |
|---|
| First sensation | 104 ml | Normal (expected: 100-200 ml) |
| First desire | 196 ml | Normal |
| Normal desire | 244 ml | Normal |
| Strong desire | 284 ml | Normal |
| Urgency | 335 ml | Present - clinically significant |
| MCC | 336 ml | Low-normal (expected: 400-600 ml in females) |
- The MCC of 336 ml is at the lower end of normal, suggesting mildly reduced functional capacity.
- Urgency was reported at 335 ml - nearly at maximum capacity - indicating the patient tolerates filling reasonably well before urgency onset, which argues against severe urgency-predominant overactive bladder.
- Sensation sequence is orderly and physiologically appropriate.
Detrusor Pressure During Filling - Normal / No Detrusor Overactivity
- Pdet remained consistently low throughout filling (5-8 cmH₂O range across all sensation points).
- No uninhibited detrusor contractions were observed.
- The filling phase tracing shows stable Pves and Pabd, with symmetric cough spikes confirming good catheter signal quality and transmission.
- No detrusor overactivity (DO) - this rules out neurogenic or idiopathic overactive bladder as a primary diagnosis.
Compliance - GOOD
Compliance result: Pdet-based linear regression from 2 ml to 100 ml:
- Pves: 55.9 ml/cmH₂O
- Pdet: 23.7 ml/cmH₂O
A compliance of 23.7 ml/cmH₂O falls within the acceptable range (normal >20 ml/cmH₂O, though values >12.5 are often considered clinically safe). The bladder accommodates filling without dangerous pressure rises, and upper urinary tract is not at risk from filling pressures.
2. VOIDING PHASE ANALYSIS - MARKEDLY ABNORMAL
This is the most significant component of the study.
| Parameter | Value | Normal Reference | Interpretation |
|---|
| Qmax | 5.6 ml/s | >15 ml/s (female) | Severely reduced |
| Average flow rate | 1.7 ml/s | >10 ml/s | Severely reduced |
| Voided volume | 68 ml | Should approach MCC | Severely reduced |
| Post-void residual (PVR) | 270 ml | <50 ml | Markedly elevated |
| Pdet at Qmax | 59 cmH₂O | 10-30 cmH₂O (female) | Elevated |
| Hesitancy | 119 seconds | <30 s | Severely prolonged |
| Voiding time | 92 s | - | Prolonged |
| Flow time | 39 s | - | Reduced relative to voiding time |
| Total bladder capacity | 338 ml | - | Low-normal |
Key finding: The patient voided only 68 ml out of 338 ml total capacity (voiding efficiency = ~20%), leaving a PVR of 270 ml. This is severely impaired bladder emptying.
Liverpool Nomogram
Both average flow rate (1.7 ml/s) and Qmax (5.6 ml/s) plot well below the 5th percentile for the voided volume - confirming this is not simply a low-volume artifact. The emptying dysfunction is real and significant.
3. DETRUSOR-FLOW (ICS) PLOT & ABRAMS-GRIFFITHS NUMBER
| Parameter | Finding | Interpretation |
|---|
| ICS Plot classification | Obstructed zone | Bladder outlet obstruction pattern |
| A/G (Abrams-Griffiths) number | 47 | Equivocal/Obstructed |
The A/G number is calculated as:
A/G = Pdet.Qmax - 2 × Qmax = 59 - (2 × 5.6) = ~48
- A/G < 20 = Unobstructed
- A/G 20-40 = Equivocal
- A/G > 40 = Obstructed
An A/G of 47 falls in the obstructed range, and the ICS plot clusters confirm a bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) pattern. However, in a female patient, this must be interpreted with caution - BOO in women is less common and may be functional (dysfunctional voiding, detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia) rather than anatomic (urethral stricture, pelvic organ prolapse, anti-incontinence surgery effect).
Importantly, the voiding phase shows elevated Pdet (59 cmH₂O) with a very low Qmax (5.6 ml/s) - a combination consistent with outlet obstruction rather than detrusor underactivity (where Pdet would be low with low flow).
4. OVERALL INTERPRETATION
Diagnosis: Bladder Outlet Obstruction (BOO) with Incomplete Bladder Emptying
This urodynamic study is abnormal and demonstrates:
- Normal storage function - no detrusor overactivity, adequate compliance, normal sensation sequence
- Severely impaired voiding - Qmax of 5.6 ml/s, average flow of 1.7 ml/s, voiding efficiency of only ~20%
- Large PVR of 270 ml - clinically significant; associated with risk of UTIs, upper tract dilatation, and overflow incontinence
- Obstructed voiding pattern - A/G number 47 (obstructed zone), high Pdet at Qmax, ICS plot in obstructed region
- Prolonged hesitancy (119 s) - pathological, suggesting impaired initiation of voiding reflex
5. CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS
| Priority | Action |
|---|
| Investigate cause of BOO in female | Cystoscopy to rule out urethral stricture, bladder neck obstruction, post-surgical obstruction |
| Pelvic examination | Assess for pelvic organ prolapse (cystocele, uterine prolapse) which can kink the urethra |
| Upper tract imaging | Renal ultrasound to assess for hydronephrosis given chronically elevated PVR |
| Voiding diary | Document frequency, volumes, urgency, and leakage episodes |
| Consider CIC | Clean intermittent catheterization may be required if PVR remains >200 ml to prevent upper tract damage and recurrent UTIs |
| Neurological assessment | If no anatomic cause found, consider neurological cause of voiding dysfunction (MS, Parkinson's, cord lesion) |
| Repeat uroflowmetry | After any intervention to monitor treatment response |
Note: In a 40-year-old female with obstructed voiding, previous anti-incontinence surgery (e.g., mid-urethral sling) should be specifically asked about in the history, as this is a common iatrogenic cause of BOO in women. Also inquire about medications (anticholinergics, antidepressants, antihistamines) that can impair detrusor contractility.
Interpreted against ICS (International Continence Society) criteria and Campbell-Walsh Wein Urology urodynamic standards.