attachment
attachment
attachment
attachment

Interpet it

analyse_media
analyse_media
Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

breast cancer screening AND thermography

Searching the Web

FDA breast thermography not substitute mammography screening official

This is a joint August 2026 position statement from the Association of Breast Surgeons of India (ABSI) and the Breast Imaging Society, India (BISI) about breast-cancer screening in India.

What it says

  • Mammography is the standard screening imaging test for breast cancer. It should be offered where it is appropriate and accessible.
  • For large-scale screening in resource-constrained or underserved Indian settings, they support clinical breast examination (CBE) by properly trained healthcare workers as a practical, evidence-based approach.
    • CBE means a trained professional examines the breasts for a lump or other abnormality.
    • It should be linked to prompt ultrasound/mammography, biopsy, pathology, navigation, and treatment when needed.
  • They state that organized CBE screening has been associated with reduced breast-cancer mortality in large Indian studies.

What it says about thermography and iBreast

  • Thermography uses an infrared camera to detect surface heat patterns and blood-flow-related temperature differences.
  • The statement says thermography and iBreast/infrared breast imaging, with or without AI, have not shown enough evidence to be used:
    • as a population screening test,
    • instead of mammography,
    • instead of CBE, or
    • as a test that can reliably rule out breast cancer.
  • It warns that these tests can give:
    • False positives: an abnormal result when cancer is not present, causing anxiety and unnecessary tests.
    • False negatives: a reassuring normal result despite cancer being present. This is the more concerning risk because someone might delay medical assessment of a breast lump or warning symptom.
This position aligns with the FDA warning on thermography: thermography is cleared only as an adjunct, not a substitute for mammography. A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis also found that evidence for breast thermography still needs stronger validation before it can be relied upon for screening (PubMed PMID 39609910).

Practical meaning for you

  • A normal thermography/iBreast report should not be treated as proof that there is no breast cancer.
  • If you have a new lump, nipple discharge especially bloody, nipple pulling-in, skin dimpling, persistent focal breast pain, swelling, or enlarged underarm nodes, see a breast surgeon or clinician promptly, even if thermography is normal.
  • The appropriate next test depends on age, symptoms, breast density, and risk profile. It may include clinical examination, ultrasound, diagnostic mammography, and sometimes biopsy.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.