Triple negative breast cancer and molecular classification, prognostic markers, inc marker/tests for breast carcinoma
"triple-negative breast cancer"[MeSH Terms] AND "molecular classification"
triple negative breast cancer molecular subtypes classification

This diagnostic comparison chart displays MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry average spectra for breast cancer classification. The figure contains four subplots (A-D) showing 'Absolute Intensity' on the y-axis against 'm/z' (mass-to-charge ratio) on the x-axis, ranging from 700 to 3150. Subplot (A) compares Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive (green) and negative (orange) samples; (B) compares Progesterone Receptor (PR) positive (green) and negative (orange); (C) shows HER2 positive (green) and negative (orange); and (D) compares Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) (green) and luminal subtypes (orange). Visually, the spectra are characterized by dense peptide peaks in the lower m/z range (700-1750), with intensity diminishing at higher mass ranges. Notable differential peak intensities are observed in the ER-positive and luminal groups compared to their counterparts, particularly around 1050 m/z. This educational material demonstrates the use of molecular profiling to identify distinctive peptide signatures associated with breast cancer receptor status and molecular subtypes.

This educational diagram illustrates the intrinsic molecular subtypes of breast cancer categorized by their hormone receptor and HER2 status. At the top, a sagittal anatomical schematic of the breast shows a localized mass, which leads to a central node representing tumor classification. From this node, five distinct pathways branch to define specific subtypes: 1) Luminal A (HR+, ER+ and/or PR+, HER2-); 2) Luminal B (HR+, ER+ and/or PR+, HER2+/-); 3) Normal-like (HR+, ER+ and/or PR+, HER2-); 4) HER2-enriched (HER2+); and 5) Triple negative (HR-, ER-, PR-, HER2-). A legend defines the abbreviations used: HR (Hormone Receptor), ER (Estrogen Receptor), PR (Progesterone Receptor), and HER2 (Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2). This infographic is designed for medical education, aiding in the understanding of oncology classification, prognostic factors, and the immunohistochemical markers that guide clinical management in breast pathology.

Educational infographic illustrating the classification of breast cancer through various biomarkers and diagnostic approaches. The left panel (I) categorizes breast cancer biomarkers into four domains: 'Classical' (Ki-67, ER, PR, HER2, P53), 'Genes' (including BRCA1/2, PIK3CA, and ATM), 'Gene expression' genomic tests (MammaPrint, Oncotype DX, etc.), and 'Others' (miRNAs, PD-1/PD-L1, MSI). The right panel (II) correlates these markers with the four molecular subtypes: Luminal A (HR+/HER2-), Luminal B (HR+/HER2+/-), HER2-enriched (HR-/HER2+), and Triple Negative (HR-/HER2-), displayed alongside a prognostic arrow ranging from 'Best prognosis' to 'Worst prognosis'. The diagram also includes anatomical cross-sections of the breast and tumor, and introduces emerging technologies like single-cell analysis and PGCCs (Polyploid Giant Cancer Cells) for future classification strategies. This resource is designed for advanced oncology students and clinicians to understand tumor heterogeneity and personalized diagnostic pathways.

This Comparison Chart illustrates the Spearman correlation coefficients between 59 breast cancer cell lines and primary tumor groups based on copy number variation (CNV) data for 2,426 genes. The visual is organized into seven horizontally stacked bar plots, each representing a specific tumor classification or molecular marker group: ER (estrogen receptor), PR (progesterone receptor), HER (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), ERPR, ERHER, TP (triple positive), and TN (triple negative). The x-axis lists the 59 individual cell lines (e.g., MCF7, BT20, MDAMB231). The y-axis measures the correlation coefficient ranging from -0.6 to 1.0. Positive correlations are indicated by red vertical bars, while negative correlations are shown in green. The chart serves as a genomic benchmarking tool in oncology research, highlighting how well established cell models reflect the copy number profiles of clinical tumor subtypes. Notably, it demonstrates variability among common models like MCF7 and reveals consistently low correlation across most groups for specific lines such as HS742T, suggesting a more metastatic or drifted genotypic profile.
breast cancer prognostic markers ER PR HER2 Ki67 immunohistochemistry

| Feature | Luminal (ER+/HER2-) | HER2 (±ER) | Triple Negative (TNBC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall frequency | 50-65% | ~20% | 10-20% |
| Typical patients | Older women; BRCA2 mutation | Younger women; germline TP53 mutation | Young women; BRCA1 carriers; African American women |
| Grade | Mainly Grade 1-2 | Mainly Grade 2-3 | Mainly Grade 3 |
| Complete response to chemo | ~10% | 15-60% | ~30% |
| Timing of relapse | Low rate over many years; late recurrence >10 years possible | Bimodal (early and late peaks) | Early peak <8 years; late recurrence rare |
| Metastatic sites | Bone (70-80%), viscera (25-30%), brain (~10%) | Bone (70%), viscera (45%), brain (30%) | Bone (40%), viscera (35%), brain (25%) |
| Common somatic mutations | PIK3CA (29-45%), TP53 (12-29%) | TP53 (70-80%), PIK3CA (~40%) | TP53 (70-80%), PIK3CA (9%) |
| Intrinsic Subtype | IHC Profile | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Luminal A | ER+, PR+, HER2-, Ki-67 low | 40-60% of cases; best prognosis; slow growing |
| Luminal B (HER2-) | ER+, PR low/-, HER2-, Ki-67 high | Higher grade, higher proliferation rate |
| Luminal B (HER2+) | ER+, PR low/-, HER2+ | Any Ki-67; benefits from HER2 therapy |
| HER2-enriched | ER-, PR-, HER2+ | 10-20%; aggressive; responds to HER2-targeted drugs |
| Basal-like | ER-, PR-, HER2-; CK5/6+, EGFR+ | Overlaps greatly with TNBC (~80% overlap) |
| Normal-like / Claudin-low | Variable | Stem-cell features; very poor prognosis |
"A useful molecular classification system that better reflects the spectrum of breast cancer biology and behavior separates breast cancers into six major 'intrinsic' subtypes based on gene expression profiling; luminal A, luminal B, HER2 enriched, basal-like, normal-like, and claudin-low."
- Robbins, Cotran & Kumar Pathologic Basis of Disease

| Subtype | Abbreviation | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Basal-like 1 (BL1) | BL1 | High cell cycle/DNA damage response genes; highest pCR to chemo |
| Basal-like 2 (BL2) | BL2 | Growth factor signaling genes; lower pCR |
| Mesenchymal (M) | M | EMT/stem cell features; may respond to PI3K/mTOR inhibitors |
| Luminal androgen receptor (LAR) | LAR | AR expression; may respond to androgen receptor antagonists |
| Marker | What It Tests | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| ER (Estrogen Receptor) | Nuclear IHC (Allred score or % positive cells) | Predicts response to endocrine therapy; favorable prognosis when positive |
| PR (Progesterone Receptor) | Nuclear IHC | Confirms ER-positive phenotype; low PR with positive ER suggests Luminal B |
| HER2 (ERBB2) | IHC (0-3+) ± FISH/ISH for 2+ cases | Predicts response to trastuzumab, pertuzumab, T-DM1, T-DXd |
| Ki-67 | Nuclear IHC (proliferation index) | Distinguishes Luminal A (<14%) from Luminal B (>20%); higher = worse prognosis |
| Assay | Genes Analyzed | Clinical Use | Applicable Subtype |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oncotype DX (Genomic Health) | 21 genes → Recurrence Score (RS) 0-100 | Predict benefit from chemo in ER+/HER2-/N0-N1 (TAILORx, RxPONDER) | Luminal only |
| MammaPrint (Agendia) | 70-gene signature | Binary low/high risk; guides chemo decision (MINDACT trial) | ER+/HER2- |
| Prosigna / PAM50 (NanoString) | 50-gene signature | Intrinsic subtype + Risk of Recurrence (RoR) score | ER+/HER2- |
| EndoPredict | 12-gene signature | Predict late recurrence risk (years 5-15) | ER+/HER2- |
| IHC4 score | ER + PR + HER2 + Ki-67 (IHC) | Provides prognostic info similar to Oncotype DX | ER+/HER2- |
"Ki-67 was included with three other widely measured breast cancer markers (ER, PR, and HER2) into a panel of four immunohistochemical makers (IHC4), which together provided similar prognostic information."
- Schwartz's Principles of Surgery, 11th ed.
"Prosigna outperformed other assays in direct comparison of six prognostic signatures." - Fischer's Mastery of Surgery, 8th ed.
| Gene | Relevance |
|---|---|
| BRCA1 (17q21) | High-penetrance mutation; strongly associated with TNBC/basal-like; PARP inhibitor eligibility |
| BRCA2 (13q12.3) | Mostly Luminal-type cancers; PARP inhibitor eligibility |
| PALB2 | Partner of BRCA2; high-risk gene |
| ATM, CHEK2, RAD51C/D | Moderate-penetrance genes; homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) |
| TP53 | Somatic mutation rate ~70-80% in TNBC/HER2 cancers |
| PIK3CA | Somatic; most common in Luminal (29-45%); alpelisib target in HR+/HER2-/PIK3CA-mutated disease |
| Marker | Relevance |
|---|---|
| PD-L1 (CPS score) | Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥10 predicts benefit from pembrolizumab in early/metastatic TNBC |
| TILs (Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes) | High TILs in TNBC correlate with better prognosis and response to immunotherapy/chemotherapy |
| TMB (Tumor Mutational Burden) | Emerging marker for checkpoint inhibitor response |
| MSI (Microsatellite Instability) | Rare in breast cancer; predicts response to pembrolizumab |
| Marker | Relevance |
|---|---|
| p53 | Mutated in high-grade/TNBC; adverse prognostic indicator |
| E-cadherin | Lost in lobular carcinoma (ILC); used to distinguish ILC from IDC |
| AR (Androgen Receptor) | Positive in ~10-35% TNBC (LAR subtype); target of enzalutamide |
| EGFR | Often overexpressed in basal-like/TNBC; not yet an established therapeutic target in breast |
| Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) | Liquid biopsy; predicts recurrence in TNBC with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemo |
| CK5/6, CK14, CK17 | Basal cytokeratins; confirm basal-like phenotype |
Prognosis (best → worst):
Luminal A → Luminal B → HER2 → TNBC
Include clinical features too prepare for 10 marks question
breast cancer clinical signs peau d'orange nipple retraction skin dimpling
breast cancer skin changes peau orange inflammatory breast carcinoma

This clinical photograph displays a frontal view of the anterior chest wall, showcasing advanced dermatological manifestations of bilateral breast pathology. Both breasts exhibit significant erythema, diffuse hyperpigmentation, and the characteristic 'peau d'orange' texture, which is indicative of dermal lymphatic invasion. The left breast demonstrates more severe involvement, including extensive nodular skin thickening, verrucous (wart-like) skin nodules, and a retracted nipple. Additionally, a focal area of frank skin ulceration and crusting is visible on the left breast, associated with an underlying tumor mass. The right breast shows similar but less advanced findings with prominent nipple retraction and peau d'orange changes. These visual signs are classic clinical indicators of inflammatory breast cancer or advanced metastatic breast carcinoma with cutaneous involvement.

This clinical photograph shows a comparative frontal view of the female chest, highlighting significant pathology in the left breast. The left breast is markedly enlarged and asymmetric compared to the right. The overlying skin of the left breast demonstrates diffuse erythema, peau d'orange-like dimpling, and textural changes indicative of underlying malignancy. The nipple of the left breast is noticeably retracted and inverted. A black arrow points to the inferior aspect of the left breast where there is evidence of skin ulceration and crusting. These clinical findings, including the inflammatory appearance and structural distortion, are highly suggestive of advanced breast cancer, specifically metaplastic carcinoma or inflammatory breast cancer. This image is used in medical education to demonstrate classic physical examination signs of locally advanced breast malignancy, such as nipple retraction, skin dimpling, and inflammatory changes.

Clinical photograph of a female patient in her mid‑fifties presenting with a left breast mass. The image demonstrates an enlarged left breast with conspicuous nipple retraction and diffuse peau d’orange skin texture consistent with lymphatic obstruction and dermal edema. A firm, irregular 6 cm palpable mass is evident in the upper outer quadrant, correlating with invasive disease. The skin over the lesion shows tethering and dimpling owing to invasion of mammary ducts and stromal fibrosis. This presentation aligns with locally advanced breast cancer and is typical of invasive ductal carcinoma, which commonly presents as a hard, non-mobile lesion with skin involvement and nipple changes. In population-based screening, such cancers are often small and asymptomatic, yet clinically detected cases show palpable masses or skin changes; metastasis to axillary nodes is a consideration. Radiologic correlation (mammography/ultrasound) would typically reveal a spiculated density or irregular mass with posterior acoustic shadowing, and histopathology would confirm infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Clinically, nipple inversion and peau d’orange reflect tumor infiltration and dermal lymphatic obstruction. Early detection improves prognosis; however, skin involvement indicates higher stage. Differential considerations include inflammatory breast cancer, benign fibrocystic change, and other malignant breast neoplasms. Management requires multidisciplinary evaluation and oncologic therapy planning.


| Subtype | Common Sites | Timing |
|---|---|---|
| TNBC / HER2 | Brain, viscera (lung, liver) | Early (<8 years); late recurrence rare |
| Luminal (ER+) | Bone (70-80%), viscera, brain | Low rate over many years; late recurrence (>10 years) possible |
| Screened (older women) | Unscreened / Young women | |
|---|---|---|
| Detection method | Mammographic density / calcifications | Palpable mass |
| Tumor size | Small | ≥2-3 cm |
| Node involvement | ~15% | >50% |
| Subtype predominance | Luminal (ER+) | TNBC and HER2+ more common |
| Group | Definition | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Luminal | ER+, HER2- | 50-65% |
| HER2 | HER2+, ER± | ~20% |
| Triple Negative (TNBC) | ER-, PR-, HER2- | 10-20% |
| Intrinsic Subtype | IHC Profile | Key Features | Prognosis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Luminal A | ER+, PR+, HER2-, Ki-67 low | 40-60% of cases; slow growing | Best |
| Luminal B (HER2-) | ER+, PR low/-, HER2-, Ki-67 high | Higher grade, higher proliferation | Intermediate |
| Luminal B (HER2+) | ER+, PR low/-, HER2+ | Any Ki-67; endocrine + HER2 therapy | Intermediate |
| HER2-enriched | ER-, PR-, HER2+ | Aggressive; responds dramatically to HER2 drugs | Poor (improved with targeted Rx) |
| Basal-like | ER-, PR-, HER2-; CK5/6+, EGFR+ | ~80% overlap with TNBC; high grade; BRCA1-associated | Worst |
| Normal-like / Claudin-low | Variable | Stem cell features; EMT | Very poor |

| Subtype | Key Features | Therapeutic Implication |
|---|---|---|
| BL1 (Basal-like 1) | High DNA damage response genes | Highest pCR to chemotherapy |
| BL2 (Basal-like 2) | Growth factor signaling | Lower pCR |
| M (Mesenchymal) | EMT, stem-cell genes | PI3K/mTOR inhibitors |
| LAR (Luminal Androgen Receptor) | AR expression | Androgen receptor antagonists (enzalutamide) |
| Factor | Significance |
|---|---|
| Tumor size (T) | Independent prognostic factor; correlates with lymph node metastasis risk |
| Lymph node status (N) | Most important prognostic factor; sentinel node biopsy is standard |
| Histologic grade (Nottingham) | Based on tubule formation + nuclear pleomorphism + mitotic rate; Grade 1-3 |
| Lymphovascular invasion | Adverse factor |
| Surgical margins | Positive margins = worse prognosis |
| Marker | Significance |
|---|---|
| ER / PR status | Positive = better prognosis; predicts response to endocrine therapy |
| HER2 status | Positive = aggressive behavior; predicts response to trastuzumab/pertuzumab |
| Ki-67 | Proliferation index; Luminal A (<14%) vs Luminal B (>20%); higher = worse |
| Molecular subtype | Luminal A > Luminal B > HER2 > TNBC (worst) |
| pCR to neoadjuvant chemo | Complete response (pCR) = better prognosis, especially in TNBC and HER2+ |
| TILs (Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes) | High TILs = improved prognosis + better response to chemo in TNBC and HER2+ |
| Assay | Genes | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Oncotype DX | 21 genes → Recurrence Score | ER+/HER2-/N0-1; guides chemo vs. endocrine-only |
| MammaPrint | 70-gene signature | Binary risk; ER+/HER2- |
| Prosigna (PAM50) | 50-gene signature | Intrinsic subtype + Risk of Recurrence score |
| IHC4 score | ER + PR + HER2 + Ki-67 | Equivalent prognostic value to Oncotype DX |
| Test | Method | Result Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| ER (Estrogen Receptor) | IHC on FFPE tissue | ≥1% nuclear staining = positive (Allred score) |
| PR (Progesterone Receptor) | IHC | ≥1% nuclear staining = positive |
| HER2 | IHC (0, 1+, 2+, 3+) | 3+ = positive; 2+ = equivocal → FISH |
| HER2 FISH/ISH | Fluorescence/Chromogenic in situ hybridization | HER2:CEP17 ratio ≥2.0 = amplified |
| Ki-67 | IHC (MIB-1 clone) | % nuclear staining; <14% = low; >20% = high |
| Marker | Purpose |
|---|---|
| E-cadherin | Lost in lobular carcinoma (ILC); distinguishes ILC from IDC |
| CK5/6, CK14, CK17 | Basal cytokeratins; confirm basal-like/TNBC phenotype |
| EGFR | Overexpressed in basal-like/TNBC; confirms basal phenotype |
| AR (Androgen Receptor) | Positive in LAR subtype of TNBC; therapeutic target |
| p63, SMA (smooth muscle actin) | Myoepithelial markers; confirm in situ vs invasive |
| Marker | Method | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| PD-L1 (CPS ≥10) | IHC (22C3 assay) | Predicts benefit from pembrolizumab in TNBC |
| TILs assessment | H&E scoring | High TILs = favorable in TNBC/HER2+ |
| MSI / MMR proteins | IHC / PCR | Rare in breast; predicts pembrolizumab response |
| TMB | NGS | Emerging; predicts checkpoint inhibitor response |
| Test | Indication | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| BRCA1/2 germline sequencing | TNBC, family history, HER2-/metastatic disease | PARP inhibitor eligibility (olaparib, talazoparib) |
| PIK3CA mutation testing | ER+/HER2- metastatic | Alpelisib eligibility |
| ESR1 mutation (ctDNA/tissue) | ER+ metastatic progressing on endocrine therapy | Guides therapy switch (elacestrant) |
| NTRK gene fusion | Secretory carcinoma | Larotrectinib/entrectinib eligibility |
| HRD (Homologous Recombination Deficiency) | TNBC neoadjuvant | Predicts platinum/PARP inhibitor benefit |
| Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) | TNBC with residual disease post-neoadjuvant | Predicts recurrence |
Prognosis (Best → Worst):
Luminal A → Luminal B → HER2 → TNBC (Basal-like)
TNBC Key Points:
• Definition: ER-/PR-/HER2-
• ~15% of all breast cancers
• Grade 3; BRCA1 association; African American women
• No endocrine or HER2 targeted therapy
• Treatment: Chemo (anthracycline + taxane ± carboplatin)
+ Pembrolizumab (early TNBC, KEYNOTE-522)
+ PARP inhibitors (if BRCA1/2 mutated)
+ Sacituzumab govitecan (metastatic)
• Early relapse (<8 yrs); brain/visceral metastases
IHC Panel: ER + PR + HER2 (± FISH) + Ki-67 + Grade
Genomic: Oncotype DX / MammaPrint / PAM50 (ER+ only)
Genetic: BRCA1/2 testing for all TNBC patients
You forgot pathogenesis
Purchased credits now give me complied answer add ethology too
Protective factors: Early pregnancy (before age 20), prolonged breastfeeding
| Gene (Syndrome) | % of Single-Gene Cancers | Risk to Age 70 | Associated Subtype | Other Cancers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRCA1 (Familial Br/Ovarian Ca) | ~55% | 40-90% (F) | Majority are TNBC | Ovarian (20-40%), fallopian tube, pancreas |
| BRCA2 (Familial Br/Ovarian Ca) | ~35% | 30-60% (F); 6% (M) | Majority are ER+ | Ovarian (10-20%), pancreas, prostate |
| TP53 (Li-Fraumeni) | <1% | 50-60% (F) | Majority are ER+/HER2+ | Sarcoma, leukemia, brain tumors |
| PTEN (Cowden) | <1% | 20-80% (F) | Variable | Thyroid, endometrium |
| STK11 (Peutz-Jeghers) | <1% | 40-60% (F) | Variable | Ovarian, colon, pancreas |
| CDH1 (Hereditary diffuse gastric Ca) | <1% | ~50% (F) | Lobular type | Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma |
| PALB2 | <1% | ~35% (F) | Variable | Pancreatic cancer |


| Sign/Symptom | Mechanism | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Palpable breast mass | Desmoplastic stromal reaction | Most common presenting feature; hard, irregular, non-tender; UOQ most common (~50%) |
| Skin dimpling/retraction | Cooper's ligament invasion by tumor | Classic sign of malignancy |
| Peau d'orange ("orange peel") | Dermal lymphatic obstruction → skin edema tethered by Cooper's ligaments | Pathognomonic of inflammatory or advanced breast cancer |
| Nipple retraction/inversion | Central breast involvement | New-onset inversion is suspicious |
| Paget disease of nipple | DCIS extending into lactiferous ducts → nipple skin | Unilateral crusting/eczematous nipple discharge |
| Skin ulceration | Advanced/locally advanced disease | Indicates T4 stage |
| Skin fixation | Chest wall invasion | Indicates T4 stage |
| Bloody nipple discharge | Intraductal tumor / Paget disease |

75% have palpable axillary lymphadenopathy; 25% have distant metastases at diagnosis

| Screened (older women) | Unscreened / young women | |
|---|---|---|
| Detection | Mammographic density or calcification | Palpable mass |
| Typical size at detection | Small (<2 cm) | ≥2-3 cm |
| Node involvement | ~15% | >50% |
| Common subtype | Luminal A | TNBC and HER2+ more common |
| In situ proportion | ~20% are DCIS | Rare in situ at presentation |
| Subtype | Sites | Timing |
|---|---|---|
| Luminal (ER+) | Bone (70-80%), viscera, brain | Low rate over many years; late recurrence >10 years possible; long survival with bone mets |
| HER2+ | Bone (70%), viscera (45%), brain (30%) | Bimodal - early and late peaks |
| TNBC | Bone (40%), viscera (35%), brain (25%) | Early peak <8 years; late recurrence rare; survival with metastases poor |
| Lobular | CSF, GI tract, serosal surfaces, ovary, uterus, bone marrow | Unique pattern - rarely bone predominant |
| Group | Definition | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Luminal (ER+/HER2-) | ER+, HER2- | 50-65% |
| HER2 | HER2+, ER± | ~20% |
| Triple Negative (TNBC) | ER-, PR-, HER2- | 10-20% |
| Subtype | IHC Equivalent | Ki-67 | Prognosis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Luminal A | ER+, PR+, HER2- | Low (<14%) | Best |
| Luminal B (HER2-) | ER+, PR low/-, HER2- | High (>20%) | Intermediate |
| Luminal B (HER2+) | ER+, HER2+ | Any | Intermediate |
| HER2-enriched | ER-, PR-, HER2+ | High | Poor (improved with targeted Rx) |
| Basal-like | ER-, PR-, HER2-; CK5/6+, EGFR+ | High | Worst |
| Normal-like / Claudin-low | Variable | Low-moderate | Poor |
| Subtype | Key Molecular Features | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| BL1 (Basal-like 1) | High DNA damage response | Highest pCR to platinum-based chemo |
| BL2 (Basal-like 2) | Growth factor receptor signaling | Lower pCR |
| M (Mesenchymal) | EMT, stem cell features | PI3K/mTOR inhibitors |
| LAR (Luminal Androgen Receptor) | Androgen receptor expression | Enzalutamide |
| Factor | Significance |
|---|---|
| Tumor size (T) | Independent prognostic factor; correlates with nodal risk |
| Lymph node status (N) | Single most important prognostic factor |
| Histologic Grade (Nottingham) | Tubule formation + Nuclear pleomorphism + Mitotic rate = Grade 1-3 |
| Lymphovascular invasion | Adverse; predicts nodal and distant spread |
| Surgical margins | Positive margins = higher local recurrence |
| Marker | Significance |
|---|---|
| ER/PR | Positive = better prognosis; predicts endocrine therapy response |
| HER2 | Positive = aggressive; predicts trastuzumab/pertuzumab response |
| Ki-67 | <14% = Luminal A; >20% = Luminal B; higher = worse prognosis |
| pCR to neoadjuvant chemo | pCR in TNBC/HER2+ = better outcome |
| TILs | High TILs in TNBC/HER2+ = better prognosis + response to immunotherapy |
| PD-L1 (CPS ≥10) | Predicts pembrolizumab benefit in TNBC |
| Assay | Genes | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Oncotype DX | 21 genes (RS 0-100) | Chemo vs. endocrine in ER+/HER2-/N0-1 |
| MammaPrint | 70-gene signature | Binary low/high risk |
| Prosigna (PAM50) | 50 genes | Intrinsic subtype + RoR score |
| IHC4 score | ER + PR + HER2 + Ki-67 | Equivalent prognostic value to Oncotype DX |
| Test | Method | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| ER | IHC (nuclear) | ≥1% staining = positive |
| PR | IHC (nuclear) | ≥1% staining = positive |
| HER2 | IHC (0-3+) | 3+ = positive; 2+ → FISH/ISH |
| HER2 FISH/ISH | Gene amplification | HER2:CEP17 ratio ≥2.0 = amplified |
| Ki-67 | IHC (% nuclear, MIB-1 clone) | <14% = low; >20% = high |
| Marker | Purpose |
|---|---|
| E-cadherin | Lost in lobular carcinoma (ILC) |
| CK5/6, CK14 | Confirm basal-like/TNBC phenotype |
| EGFR | Overexpressed in basal-like TNBC |
| AR (Androgen Receptor) | LAR subtype of TNBC; enzalutamide target |
| p63 / SMA | Myoepithelial markers - confirm in situ vs invasive |
| Marker | Test | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| PD-L1 (CPS ≥10) | IHC (22C3 assay) | Pembrolizumab benefit in TNBC |
| MSI/MMR | IHC / PCR | Rare in breast; checkpoint inhibitor indication |
| TMB | NGS panel | Emerging predictive marker |
| Test | Indication | Therapeutic Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| BRCA1/2 germline sequencing | ALL TNBC patients, strong family history | PARP inhibitors (olaparib, talazoparib) |
| PIK3CA mutation | ER+/HER2- metastatic at progression | Alpelisib eligibility |
| ESR1 mutation (ctDNA) | ER+ metastatic progressing on endocrine Rx | Elacestrant eligibility |
| HRD score | TNBC neoadjuvant setting | Platinum/PARP inhibitor benefit |
| ctDNA | TNBC with residual disease post-neoadjuvant | Predicts recurrence |
| NTRK gene fusion | Secretory carcinoma | Larotrectinib/entrectinib |
ETIOLOGY KEY POINTS:
• Most important risk factors: Sex (female), Age, Estrogen exposure, Genetics
• BRCA1 mutation → TNBC; BRCA2 mutation → ER+ Luminal
• Protective: Early pregnancy (<20 yrs), prolonged breastfeeding
PATHOGENESIS PATHWAYS:
Low-grade: PIK3CA mutation → Flat atypia → ADH → low-grade DCIS → LUMINAL A
High-grade: TP53 + HER2 amplification → DCIS → HER2+
DNA damage: BRCA1 inactivation + TP53 mutation → DCIS → TRIPLE NEGATIVE
CLINICAL FEATURES (remember "SNIP-LAMP"):
Skin dimpling, Nipple retraction/Paget disease, Inflammatory signs (peau d'orange)
Palpable lump (UOQ most common), Axillary lymphadenopathy, Metastases, Peau d'orange
MOLECULAR SUBTYPE PROGNOSIS (best → worst):
Luminal A → Luminal B → HER2 → TNBC
TNBC TREATMENT:
Chemo (anthracycline + taxane ± carboplatin)
+ Pembrolizumab (early TNBC, CPS-unselected - KEYNOTE-522)
+ PARP inhibitors (BRCA1/2 mutated)
+ Sacituzumab govitecan (metastatic)
IHC PANEL: ER + PR + HER2 (± FISH) + Ki-67 + Grade
GENETIC: BRCA1/2 testing for ALL TNBC