Orris

Give me short notes on doctor patient relationship

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching the Web

doctor patient relationship medical ethics short notes

Reading File
Reading File
Here are concise short notes on the Doctor-Patient Relationship (DPR):

Doctor-Patient Relationship

Definition

The doctor-patient relationship is the foundational social and ethical contract of medicine - formed when a physician attends to a patient's medical needs, usually through consent. It is the core element of ethical medical practice.

Historical Background

  • Originally resembled a priest-supplicant relationship where the healer had near-magical authority
  • The Hippocratic Oath (4th century BC) codified key principles: patient confidentiality, abstaining from sexual contact with patients, and the principle of Primum non nocere ("first, do no harm")
  • Traditionally, beneficence (acting for the patient's medical benefit) justified a paternalistic, physician-driven approach
  • During the late 19th - 20th centuries, patient autonomy gradually displaced medical paternalism
  • The landmark 1914 case Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital established: "Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body"

Models of Doctor-Patient Relationship

ModelDescription
PaternalisticDoctor decides; patient is passive. Traditional approach.
InformativeDoctor provides all information; patient makes decisions.
InterpretiveDoctor helps patient clarify values and choose treatment.
DeliberativeDoctor acts as teacher/friend, guides patient toward best health choices.
Shared Decision-MakingBoth doctor and patient participate equally - the modern ideal.

Key Ethical Principles Governing DPR

  1. Autonomy - Respect the patient's right to make informed decisions
  2. Beneficence - Act in the patient's best interest
  3. Non-maleficence - Do no harm
  4. Justice - Fair and equitable treatment for all patients

Essential Ingredients of a Good DPR

  • Trust - Mutual; doctor trusts patient to be honest, patient trusts doctor to maintain confidentiality
  • Communication - At three levels (Park's Textbook):
    • Emotional plane: Sympathetic listening; establishes quick rapport
    • Cultural plane: Awareness of patient's cultural background and beliefs; "flexibility" in approach
    • Intellectual plane: Bridging the gap between physician sophistication and patient literacy; humour is the best icebreaker
  • Confidentiality - Information shared in the clinical encounter stays protected
  • Respect - Treating all patients equally regardless of socioeconomic status
  • Honesty - Full, truthful disclosure

Informed Consent (Legal Cornerstone)

First formally established in Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University (1957). Three required elements:
  1. Physician's disclosure (diagnosis, treatment options, risks/benefits, alternatives)
  2. Patient's voluntariness (free from coercion)
  3. Patient's mental competence
Exceptions to informed consent: medical emergency, patient's waiver, and therapeutic privilege (when disclosure would harm the patient).

Levels of Communication (Social Medicine Perspective)

Park's Preventive and Social Medicine describes three planes of doctor-patient communication:
  1. Emotional - Sympathetic ear; establishes rapport; key to why folk medicine succeeds
  2. Cultural - Understanding the community's cultural patterns, beliefs (e.g., hot/cold disease concepts); couching scientific advice in culturally acceptable terms
  3. Intellectual - Reducing "social distance" between the educated physician and the common patient

Factors That Can Harm DPR

  • Greed for money / differential treatment between rich and poor
  • Lack of sympathetic attitude
  • Poor communication
  • Corruption in healthcare management
  • Inequity in healthcare delivery
  • Over-reliance on health insurance systems (which depersonalize care)
  • Dehumanization in clinical encounters

Dehumanization in DPR

Modern medicine risks dehumanizing the relationship through:
  • Over-reliance on technology and investigations
  • Time constraints in busy clinical settings
  • Institutional bureaucracy
  • Viewing the patient as a "case" rather than a person

Psychiatric Considerations

In psychiatry, patient autonomy may be temporarily modified when:
  • The patient lacks decision-making capacity
  • Involuntary treatment is clinically warranted
  • Significant psychiatric symptoms impair judgment

Termination of the DPR

A physician may lawfully end the relationship after:
  • Adequate notice to the patient
  • Referral to another physician when necessary
  • Situations involving non-compliance, threats, or fraud by the patient
Sources: Park's Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine, p. 789; Kaplan & Sadock's Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, p. 13957-13958
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.