Orris

Give me short notes on doctor patient relationship

The doctor-patient relationship is built on trust, communication, and mutual respect. At its core, it involves a professional commitment by the physician to act in the patient's best interest, while the patient provides honest information and cooperates with care. Key ethical principles (autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice) govern this relationship. Models range from paternalistic (doctor decides) to patient-centered (shared decision-making).
Searching sources...
Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching the Web

doctor patient relationship medical ethics short notes

Reading File
Reading File
Here are concise short notes on the Doctor-Patient Relationship (DPR):

Doctor-Patient Relationship

Definition

The doctor-patient relationship is the foundational social and ethical contract of medicine - formed when a physician attends to a patient's medical needs, usually through consent. It is the core element of ethical medical practice.

Historical Background

  • Originally resembled a priest-supplicant relationship where the healer had near-magical authority
  • The Hippocratic Oath (4th century BC) codified key principles: patient confidentiality, abstaining from sexual contact with patients, and the principle of Primum non nocere ("first, do no harm")
  • Traditionally, beneficence (acting for the patient's medical benefit) justified a paternalistic, physician-driven approach
  • During the late 19th - 20th centuries, patient autonomy gradually displaced medical paternalism
  • The landmark 1914 case Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital established: "Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body"

Models of Doctor-Patient Relationship

ModelDescription
PaternalisticDoctor decides; patient is passive. Traditional approach.
InformativeDoctor provides all information; patient makes decisions.
InterpretiveDoctor helps patient clarify values and choose treatment.
DeliberativeDoctor acts as teacher/friend, guides patient toward best health choices.
Shared Decision-MakingBoth doctor and patient participate equally - the modern ideal.

Key Ethical Principles Governing DPR

  1. Autonomy - Respect the patient's right to make informed decisions
  2. Beneficence - Act in the patient's best interest
  3. Non-maleficence - Do no harm
  4. Justice - Fair and equitable treatment for all patients

Essential Ingredients of a Good DPR

  • Trust - Mutual; doctor trusts patient to be honest, patient trusts doctor to maintain confidentiality
  • Communication - At three levels (Park's Textbook):
    • Emotional plane: Sympathetic listening; establishes quick rapport
    • Cultural plane: Awareness of patient's cultural background and beliefs; "flexibility" in approach
    • Intellectual plane: Bridging the gap between physician sophistication and patient literacy; humour is the best icebreaker
  • Confidentiality - Information shared in the clinical encounter stays protected
  • Respect - Treating all patients equally regardless of socioeconomic status
  • Honesty - Full, truthful disclosure

Informed Consent (Legal Cornerstone)

First formally established in Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University (1957). Three required elements:
  1. Physician's disclosure (diagnosis, treatment options, risks/benefits, alternatives)
  2. Patient's voluntariness (free from coercion)
  3. Patient's mental competence
Exceptions to informed consent: medical emergency, patient's waiver, and therapeutic privilege (when disclosure would harm the patient).

Levels of Communication (Social Medicine Perspective)

Park's Preventive and Social Medicine describes three planes of doctor-patient communication:
  1. Emotional - Sympathetic ear; establishes rapport; key to why folk medicine succeeds
  2. Cultural - Understanding the community's cultural patterns, beliefs (e.g., hot/cold disease concepts); couching scientific advice in culturally acceptable terms
  3. Intellectual - Reducing "social distance" between the educated physician and the common patient

Factors That Can Harm DPR

  • Greed for money / differential treatment between rich and poor
  • Lack of sympathetic attitude
  • Poor communication
  • Corruption in healthcare management
  • Inequity in healthcare delivery
  • Over-reliance on health insurance systems (which depersonalize care)
  • Dehumanization in clinical encounters

Dehumanization in DPR

Modern medicine risks dehumanizing the relationship through:
  • Over-reliance on technology and investigations
  • Time constraints in busy clinical settings
  • Institutional bureaucracy
  • Viewing the patient as a "case" rather than a person

Psychiatric Considerations

In psychiatry, patient autonomy may be temporarily modified when:
  • The patient lacks decision-making capacity
  • Involuntary treatment is clinically warranted
  • Significant psychiatric symptoms impair judgment

Termination of the DPR

A physician may lawfully end the relationship after:
  • Adequate notice to the patient
  • Referral to another physician when necessary
  • Situations involving non-compliance, threats, or fraud by the patient
Sources: Park's Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine, p. 789; Kaplan & Sadock's Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, p. 13957-13958
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.