Mitral regurgitation as per brawnwald

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
I now have very comprehensive content from Braunwald's. Let me now compile the complete answer.

Mitral Regurgitation - Braunwald's Heart Disease


Overview

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most prevalent valvular disorder, occurring in 9-10% of elderly patients in the United States. MR results from dysfunction of any component of the complex mitral valve (MV) apparatus - the leaflets, chordae tendineae, annulus, papillary muscles, or left ventricle. It is broadly classified into two types:
  • Primary (organic/degenerative) - disease of the leaflets themselves (e.g., mitral valve prolapse [MVP], fibromuscular dysplasia, rheumatic disease, endocarditis)
  • Secondary (ischemic/functional) - leaflets are intrinsically normal; caused by disease of the atrium/ventricle (e.g., ischemic dysfunction, dilated cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation)

Mitral Valve Anatomy

The MV is a complex 3-dimensional structure. Coordinated interaction of all the following is essential for functional integrity:
  1. Annulus - saddle-shaped (not a simple ring); has anterior and posterior peaks; its anterior horn adjoins the aortic annulus (aortomitral curtain/intervalvular fibrosa)
  2. Commissures - anterolateral and posteromedial
  3. Leaflets - anterior (larger, ~1/3 of annular circumference) and posterior (smaller, 3 scallops: P1, P2, P3)
  4. Chordae tendineae - primary, secondary, tertiary chords; primary chords attach to free edge (prevent prolapse)
  5. Papillary muscles - anterolateral and posteromedial, arising from posterior half of LV; maintain leaflet closure away from LVOT
  6. Left ventricle - LV contraction moves annulus toward apex; LV-annulus-aortic angle becomes more acute during systole to facilitate LVOT flow
Braunwald's Heart Disease, p. 775

Morphologic Classification (Carpentier)

Based on leaflet mobility:
TypeLeaflet MotionMechanismExamples
Type INormalAnnular dilation, leaflet perforation/cleftAnnular dilation (AF/HFpEF), endocarditis
Type IIExcessive (prolapse/flail)Chordal elongation or rupture, papillary muscle elongationMVP, myxomatous disease (Barlow's), ruptured chordae
Type IIIARestricted (systole + diastole)Leaflet/chordal thickening, fusionRheumatic disease ("fish mouth" appearance)
Type IIIBRestricted (systole only)Papillary muscle displacement, tetheringIschemic MR, dilated cardiomyopathy
Major causes:
  • Myxomatous degeneration (MVP) - most common in developed countries
  • Rheumatic heart disease
  • Infective endocarditis
  • Ischemic heart disease / papillary muscle dysfunction
  • Dilated cardiomyopathy
  • Mitral annular calcification
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  • Less common: collagen vascular diseases, hypereosinophilic syndrome, carcinoid, drugs, trauma
Braunwald's Heart Disease, p. 775

PRIMARY (ORGANIC) MR

Pathophysiology / Hemodynamics

In chronic primary MR:
  • The MV leak creates a low-impedance pathway for LV ejection - blood exits both forward (aorta) and backward (LA) during systole
  • LA receives regurgitant volume; becomes progressively dilated, absorbing increased volume at low pressure (high compliance)
  • LV is volume-overloaded; eccentric hypertrophy ensues; increased EDV, increased total stroke volume, preserved EF early on
  • EF is supranormal in compensated MR due to reduced afterload (EF >60% is expected; EF 60% in severe MR actually represents relative impairment)
  • End-systolic volume is the most sensitive indicator of LV function; ESV <40 mm (LVESD) indicates preserved function
  • As disease progresses: LV contractile dysfunction occurs, ESV rises, EF drops, forward output falls, symptoms appear
Key hemodynamic point: Unlike AS, which imposes a pressure overload, MR is a pure volume overload - it is better tolerated for longer but eventually leads to irreversible LV dysfunction if not corrected.

Clinical Presentation

Symptoms:
  • Many patients remain asymptomatic for years, even with severe MR
  • Initial symptoms: exertional dyspnea, fatigue, exercise intolerance (from elevated pulmonary venous pressure or LV decompensation)
  • Later: orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, frank pulmonary edema
  • Atrial fibrillation is common; can unmask symptoms in previously asymptomatic patients
  • Symptoms may occur even with preserved LV contractile function due to severely elevated pulmonary venous pressures or AF
Physical Examination:
Pulse: Carotid arterial upstroke is sharp and brisk (unlike AS where it is delayed); cardiac impulse is brisk, hyperdynamic, displaced laterally; prominent LV filling wave palpable in thin patients.
Auscultation:
  • S1 is often diminished (defective leaflet closure)
  • Wide splitting of S2 - due to shortened LV ejection time and early A2
  • S3 (third heart sound) - present in severe MR; represents abnormal increase in flow across mitral orifice during rapid filling; NOT necessarily a sign of HF in this context; may be followed by a brief diastolic rumble
  • Systolic murmur: Holosystolic (pansystolic), blowing, high-pitched, loudest at apex, radiates to left axilla and left infrascapular area (for posteriorly directed jets); radiation toward sternum/aortic area with anteriorly directed jets (e.g., posterior leaflet prolapse/flail); starts immediately after soft S1 and continues beyond A2
  • Murmur intensity shows little variation with AF (contrast with AS where murmur varies with cycle length); little correlation between murmur intensity and MR severity
  • Murmur is intensified by isometric exercise (differentiates from AS and HOCM which decrease)
  • With standing: murmur decreases; with squatting: murmur increases
  • Valsalva maneuver: murmur softens (strain phase), transient overshoot 6-8 beats after release
  • P2 louder than A2 if severe pulmonary hypertension develops
Braunwald's Heart Disease, pp. 777-778
Echocardiography:
  • Central to diagnosis, etiology determination, severity quantification, and repair planning
  • Severity assessment: structural, qualitative (color jet area, vena contracta, flow convergence/PISA), semi-quantitative (pulmonary vein flow reversal), and quantitative (regurgitant volume [Rvol], regurgitant fraction [RF], effective regurgitant orifice area [EROA])
  • Severe primary MR criteria: EROA ≥0.40 cm², Rvol ≥60 mL, RF ≥50%
  • LV size and function (LVEDD, LVESD, LVEF) are key determinants of surgical timing
  • 3D echocardiography and TEE provide superior anatomic detail for repair planning
Cardiac MRI (CMR):
  • Most accurate for measuring LV EDV, ESV, and mass
  • Accurate regurgitant flow quantification correlating well with quantitative Doppler
  • Important role in identifying myocardial fibrosis in MVP patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias or mitral annular disjunction (MAD)
Cardiac CT:
  • Useful for annular sizing, quantifying annular calcification
  • Particularly valuable for planning percutaneous MV replacement

Natural History

  • MVP is the most common cause of chronic primary MR in developed countries; prevalence ~2-3% (using strict echocardiographic criteria: >2 mm leaflet displacement beyond annular long-axis plane with >5 mm leaflet thickening)
  • Flail leaflet (chordal rupture with eversion into LA) has worse prognosis than MVP without flail
  • Community-based study (833 asymptomatic MVP patients): 10-year all-cause mortality 19% ±2%, cardiovascular mortality 9%
  • Strong association with HF, need for valve surgery, AF, and increased mortality
  • Once symptomatic, 5-year mortality without surgery is ~50%
  • Risk factors for adverse outcomes in primary MR: flail leaflet, severe MR (Rvol ≥60 mL), LVESD ≥40 mm, LVEF ≤60%, AF, pulmonary hypertension

Management of Primary MR

Medical:
  • No proven medical therapy to delay surgery in asymptomatic primary MR with preserved LV function
  • Vasodilators (ACEi, ARBs, hydralazine) are NOT indicated in asymptomatic patients with normal LV function
  • Rate control or rhythm control for AF; anticoagulation if AF is present
  • Diuretics for pulmonary congestion symptoms
Surgical Indications (2020 ACC/AHA Guidelines):
IndicationRecommendation Class
Symptomatic severe primary MR with LVEF >30%Class I
Asymptomatic severe MR with LVEF ≤60% OR LVESD ≥40 mmClass I
Asymptomatic severe MR with LVEF >60%, new AF or resting pulmonary artery pressure >50 mmHgClass IIa
Asymptomatic severe MR, normal LV function, high likelihood of durable repair (experienced center)Class IIa
  • Mitral valve repair is strongly preferred over replacement whenever technically feasible - better preservation of LV function, lower operative mortality, no need for long-term anticoagulation with tissue valves, improved durability
  • Repair vs. replacement: Repair is preferred if a durable and successful repair can be achieved (especially for Carpentier type II disease with MVP/flail of P2 scallop, which is most repairable)
  • MVR (valve replacement) is indicated when leaflets are fused, extensively fibrotic/calcified, or have chordal shortening/fusion (typically rheumatic disease)
Braunwald's Heart Disease, pp. 1463-1464

SECONDARY (FUNCTIONAL) MR

Pathophysiology

Two main subtypes:
1. Atriogenic MR (Carpentier Type I):
  • Due to LA and annular dilation from chronic AF or HFpEF
  • LV and leaflets are intrinsically normal
  • Mechanism: LA dilation → annular dilation and flattening → insufficient leaflet growth relative to annular area → abnormal coaptation
  • Restoration of sinus rhythm may reduce MR; rhythm control plays a role
2. Ventricular (Ischemic/Dilated Cardiomyopathy) MR (Carpentier Type IIIB):
  • Mechanisms: (1) Global/regional LV dilation/dysfunction - reduced closing forces; (2) Papillary muscle displacement with leaflet tethering (outweighs closing forces); (3) Annular dilation/dysfunction; (4) Inadequate leaflet adaptation to ventricular or atrial enlargement
  • Anatomic predictors of severity and recurrence after repair: leaflet tethering/restricted closure, asymmetric papillary muscle displacement, decreased interpapillary distance, increased LV sphericity

Clinical Presentation

  • Patients often present with heart failure symptoms (dyspnea, fatigue, orthopnea); MR may be detected incidentally
  • AF is common
  • Systolic murmur of secondary MR related to LV dilation is often softer and shorter than in primary MR (due to reduced driving pressure in the failing ventricle)
  • An apical S3 is a common finding
  • Secondary pulmonary hypertension is common with severe MR, leading to right-sided HF signs (raised JVP, peripheral edema, TR murmur)

Management of Secondary MR

Medical (first-line):
  • ACEi/ARBs, beta-blockers, diuretics for HF symptoms and LV remodeling
  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for patients with LBBB and LVEF ≤35% - may reduce secondary MR by improving LV synchrony and geometry
  • Rhythm/rate control of AF
Surgical:
  • More controversial than primary MR - surgery improves MR but does not reliably improve LV function or long-term outcomes in secondary MR
  • Surgical repair (ring annuloplasty) has high recurrence rate (~60% at 5 years) in ischemic MR
  • MVR may be preferred over repair in some secondary MR scenarios given high repair recurrence
Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (TEER - MitraClip):
  • COAPT trial (most important trial for secondary MR): In patients with HF and moderate-to-severe or severe secondary MR who remained symptomatic despite maximally tolerated GDMT (mean age 72 years), TEER resulted in significantly lower rate of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality over mean 24-month follow-up vs. medical therapy alone
  • FDA-approved for heart failure patients with LV dysfunction and secondary MR despite optimal medical therapy
  • MitraClip replicates the Alfieri edge-to-edge stitch technique, creating a double-orifice MV
  • 2020 ACC/AHA guidelines: TEER is recommended (Class IIa) for symptomatic severe secondary MR despite GDMT in patients with LVEF 20-50%, LVESD ≤70 mm, and anatomy favorable for repair
Braunwald's Heart Disease, p. 784

ACUTE MITRAL REGURGITATION

Causes

  • Spontaneous rupture of chordae tendineae (most common)
  • Infective endocarditis with leaflet/chordal disruption
  • Ischemic papillary muscle rupture - complicating acute MI (especially posteromedial papillary muscle, supplied by single coronary artery)
  • Malfunction of prosthetic valve
  • Trauma

Pathophysiology and Clinical Features

Acute severe MR is a hemodynamic emergency with several features that distinguish it from chronic MR:
  • LA is normal-sized (low compliance) → LA pressure rises abruptly → acute pulmonary edema
  • Marked elevation of v wave in LA/pulmonary artery tracing
  • Forward stroke volume drops sharply; right heart failure develops
Key physical examination differences vs. chronic MR:
  • Murmur may be decrescendo rather than holosystolic - as elevated LA v wave reduces LV-LA gradient in late systole, murmur ends before A2
  • Murmur is usually lower-pitched and softer than chronic MR
  • Left-sided S4 is frequently present
  • Pulmonary hypertension → loud P2, pulmonary regurgitation murmur, TR murmur, right-sided S4
  • Paradoxical splitting of S2 may rarely occur (elevated LA v wave causes premature pulmonary valve closure and early P2)
  • Chest X-ray: only mild cardiac enlargement or normal heart size despite severe hemodynamic compromise (no time for compensatory dilation); marked pulmonary edema
  • Echo: Minimal LV/LA dilation despite severe MR; elevated PASP; characteristic triangular CW Doppler profile (vs. parabolic in chronic MR) due to early cessation of regurgitation

Management of Acute MR

Medical stabilization:
  • IV nitroprusside - afterload reduction is critical; reduces regurgitant fraction and improves forward output; may be lifesaving in papillary muscle rupture complicating acute MI
  • If hypotensive: add dobutamine (inotrope) with nitroprusside
  • Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) - to stabilize the patient hemodynamically while preparing for surgery (reduces afterload, augments diastolic coronary perfusion)
Definitive treatment: Surgery
  • Emergency MVR (with resection of ruptured papillary muscle and infarct zone if post-MI) is the treatment of choice
  • Emergency surgery carries higher mortality than elective surgery for chronic MR, but mortality without surgery in acute severe MR with HF is extremely high
  • Surgery should not be delayed unless the patient can be rapidly stabilized
Braunwald's Heart Disease, pp. 1470-1471

TRANSCATHETER THERAPY (Summary)

Surgery for MR carries 1-5% mortality (higher in elderly, those with LV dysfunction). Transcatheter approaches developed to address this:
Device/ApproachTargetTrialStatus
MitraClip (TEER)Leaflet (edge-to-edge repair)EVEREST II (primary MR), COAPT (secondary MR), MITRA-FRFDA-approved; CE Mark
Annuloplasty devices (Cardioband, Carillon)AnnulusVariousCE Mark / investigational
Transcatheter MV replacement (TMVR)Full valveEvolvingInvestigational

Key Numbers to Remember

ParameterThreshold / Value
Severe primary MR: EROA≥0.40 cm²
Severe primary MR: Rvol≥60 mL
Severe primary MR: RF≥50%
Surgery indicated if LVEF≤60%
Surgery indicated if LVESD≥40 mm
Normal LVEF in MR (compensated)>65-70% (supranormal expected)
MVP echocardiographic criteria>2 mm displacement beyond annulus, >5 mm leaflet thickness
MVP prevalence~2-3%
MR prevalence in elderly (≥75 yr)>10% moderate or greater

Clinical Stages of Primary MR (ACC/AHA)

StageDescription
AAt risk (MVP without MR)
BProgressive (mild-moderate MR, no symptoms, normal LV)
C1Severe asymptomatic, preserved LV (LVEF >60%, LVESD <40 mm)
C2Severe asymptomatic, with LV dysfunction (LVEF ≤60% or LVESD ≥40 mm)
DSevere symptomatic

All content sourced from: Braunwald's Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 12th Edition (ISBN: 9780323722193), Chapter 76 (Mitral Regurgitation) and Chapter 78 (Transcatheter Therapies for Valvular Heart Disease).
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.