I now have very comprehensive content from Braunwald's. Let me now compile the complete answer.
Mitral Regurgitation - Braunwald's Heart Disease
Overview
Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most prevalent valvular disorder, occurring in 9-10% of elderly patients in the United States. MR results from dysfunction of any component of the complex mitral valve (MV) apparatus - the leaflets, chordae tendineae, annulus, papillary muscles, or left ventricle. It is broadly classified into two types:
- Primary (organic/degenerative) - disease of the leaflets themselves (e.g., mitral valve prolapse [MVP], fibromuscular dysplasia, rheumatic disease, endocarditis)
- Secondary (ischemic/functional) - leaflets are intrinsically normal; caused by disease of the atrium/ventricle (e.g., ischemic dysfunction, dilated cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation)
Mitral Valve Anatomy
The MV is a complex 3-dimensional structure. Coordinated interaction of all the following is essential for functional integrity:
- Annulus - saddle-shaped (not a simple ring); has anterior and posterior peaks; its anterior horn adjoins the aortic annulus (aortomitral curtain/intervalvular fibrosa)
- Commissures - anterolateral and posteromedial
- Leaflets - anterior (larger, ~1/3 of annular circumference) and posterior (smaller, 3 scallops: P1, P2, P3)
- Chordae tendineae - primary, secondary, tertiary chords; primary chords attach to free edge (prevent prolapse)
- Papillary muscles - anterolateral and posteromedial, arising from posterior half of LV; maintain leaflet closure away from LVOT
- Left ventricle - LV contraction moves annulus toward apex; LV-annulus-aortic angle becomes more acute during systole to facilitate LVOT flow
Braunwald's Heart Disease, p. 775
Morphologic Classification (Carpentier)
Based on leaflet mobility:
| Type | Leaflet Motion | Mechanism | Examples |
|---|
| Type I | Normal | Annular dilation, leaflet perforation/cleft | Annular dilation (AF/HFpEF), endocarditis |
| Type II | Excessive (prolapse/flail) | Chordal elongation or rupture, papillary muscle elongation | MVP, myxomatous disease (Barlow's), ruptured chordae |
| Type IIIA | Restricted (systole + diastole) | Leaflet/chordal thickening, fusion | Rheumatic disease ("fish mouth" appearance) |
| Type IIIB | Restricted (systole only) | Papillary muscle displacement, tethering | Ischemic MR, dilated cardiomyopathy |
Major causes:
- Myxomatous degeneration (MVP) - most common in developed countries
- Rheumatic heart disease
- Infective endocarditis
- Ischemic heart disease / papillary muscle dysfunction
- Dilated cardiomyopathy
- Mitral annular calcification
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- Less common: collagen vascular diseases, hypereosinophilic syndrome, carcinoid, drugs, trauma
Braunwald's Heart Disease, p. 775
PRIMARY (ORGANIC) MR
Pathophysiology / Hemodynamics
In chronic primary MR:
- The MV leak creates a low-impedance pathway for LV ejection - blood exits both forward (aorta) and backward (LA) during systole
- LA receives regurgitant volume; becomes progressively dilated, absorbing increased volume at low pressure (high compliance)
- LV is volume-overloaded; eccentric hypertrophy ensues; increased EDV, increased total stroke volume, preserved EF early on
- EF is supranormal in compensated MR due to reduced afterload (EF >60% is expected; EF 60% in severe MR actually represents relative impairment)
- End-systolic volume is the most sensitive indicator of LV function; ESV <40 mm (LVESD) indicates preserved function
- As disease progresses: LV contractile dysfunction occurs, ESV rises, EF drops, forward output falls, symptoms appear
Key hemodynamic point: Unlike AS, which imposes a pressure overload, MR is a pure volume overload - it is better tolerated for longer but eventually leads to irreversible LV dysfunction if not corrected.
Clinical Presentation
Symptoms:
- Many patients remain asymptomatic for years, even with severe MR
- Initial symptoms: exertional dyspnea, fatigue, exercise intolerance (from elevated pulmonary venous pressure or LV decompensation)
- Later: orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, frank pulmonary edema
- Atrial fibrillation is common; can unmask symptoms in previously asymptomatic patients
- Symptoms may occur even with preserved LV contractile function due to severely elevated pulmonary venous pressures or AF
Physical Examination:
Pulse: Carotid arterial upstroke is sharp and brisk (unlike AS where it is delayed); cardiac impulse is brisk, hyperdynamic, displaced laterally; prominent LV filling wave palpable in thin patients.
Auscultation:
- S1 is often diminished (defective leaflet closure)
- Wide splitting of S2 - due to shortened LV ejection time and early A2
- S3 (third heart sound) - present in severe MR; represents abnormal increase in flow across mitral orifice during rapid filling; NOT necessarily a sign of HF in this context; may be followed by a brief diastolic rumble
- Systolic murmur: Holosystolic (pansystolic), blowing, high-pitched, loudest at apex, radiates to left axilla and left infrascapular area (for posteriorly directed jets); radiation toward sternum/aortic area with anteriorly directed jets (e.g., posterior leaflet prolapse/flail); starts immediately after soft S1 and continues beyond A2
- Murmur intensity shows little variation with AF (contrast with AS where murmur varies with cycle length); little correlation between murmur intensity and MR severity
- Murmur is intensified by isometric exercise (differentiates from AS and HOCM which decrease)
- With standing: murmur decreases; with squatting: murmur increases
- Valsalva maneuver: murmur softens (strain phase), transient overshoot 6-8 beats after release
- P2 louder than A2 if severe pulmonary hypertension develops
Braunwald's Heart Disease, pp. 777-778
Echocardiography:
- Central to diagnosis, etiology determination, severity quantification, and repair planning
- Severity assessment: structural, qualitative (color jet area, vena contracta, flow convergence/PISA), semi-quantitative (pulmonary vein flow reversal), and quantitative (regurgitant volume [Rvol], regurgitant fraction [RF], effective regurgitant orifice area [EROA])
- Severe primary MR criteria: EROA ≥0.40 cm², Rvol ≥60 mL, RF ≥50%
- LV size and function (LVEDD, LVESD, LVEF) are key determinants of surgical timing
- 3D echocardiography and TEE provide superior anatomic detail for repair planning
Cardiac MRI (CMR):
- Most accurate for measuring LV EDV, ESV, and mass
- Accurate regurgitant flow quantification correlating well with quantitative Doppler
- Important role in identifying myocardial fibrosis in MVP patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias or mitral annular disjunction (MAD)
Cardiac CT:
- Useful for annular sizing, quantifying annular calcification
- Particularly valuable for planning percutaneous MV replacement
Natural History
- MVP is the most common cause of chronic primary MR in developed countries; prevalence ~2-3% (using strict echocardiographic criteria: >2 mm leaflet displacement beyond annular long-axis plane with >5 mm leaflet thickening)
- Flail leaflet (chordal rupture with eversion into LA) has worse prognosis than MVP without flail
- Community-based study (833 asymptomatic MVP patients): 10-year all-cause mortality 19% ±2%, cardiovascular mortality 9%
- Strong association with HF, need for valve surgery, AF, and increased mortality
- Once symptomatic, 5-year mortality without surgery is ~50%
- Risk factors for adverse outcomes in primary MR: flail leaflet, severe MR (Rvol ≥60 mL), LVESD ≥40 mm, LVEF ≤60%, AF, pulmonary hypertension
Management of Primary MR
Medical:
- No proven medical therapy to delay surgery in asymptomatic primary MR with preserved LV function
- Vasodilators (ACEi, ARBs, hydralazine) are NOT indicated in asymptomatic patients with normal LV function
- Rate control or rhythm control for AF; anticoagulation if AF is present
- Diuretics for pulmonary congestion symptoms
Surgical Indications (2020 ACC/AHA Guidelines):
| Indication | Recommendation Class |
|---|
| Symptomatic severe primary MR with LVEF >30% | Class I |
| Asymptomatic severe MR with LVEF ≤60% OR LVESD ≥40 mm | Class I |
| Asymptomatic severe MR with LVEF >60%, new AF or resting pulmonary artery pressure >50 mmHg | Class IIa |
| Asymptomatic severe MR, normal LV function, high likelihood of durable repair (experienced center) | Class IIa |
- Mitral valve repair is strongly preferred over replacement whenever technically feasible - better preservation of LV function, lower operative mortality, no need for long-term anticoagulation with tissue valves, improved durability
- Repair vs. replacement: Repair is preferred if a durable and successful repair can be achieved (especially for Carpentier type II disease with MVP/flail of P2 scallop, which is most repairable)
- MVR (valve replacement) is indicated when leaflets are fused, extensively fibrotic/calcified, or have chordal shortening/fusion (typically rheumatic disease)
Braunwald's Heart Disease, pp. 1463-1464
SECONDARY (FUNCTIONAL) MR
Pathophysiology
Two main subtypes:
1. Atriogenic MR (Carpentier Type I):
- Due to LA and annular dilation from chronic AF or HFpEF
- LV and leaflets are intrinsically normal
- Mechanism: LA dilation → annular dilation and flattening → insufficient leaflet growth relative to annular area → abnormal coaptation
- Restoration of sinus rhythm may reduce MR; rhythm control plays a role
2. Ventricular (Ischemic/Dilated Cardiomyopathy) MR (Carpentier Type IIIB):
- Mechanisms: (1) Global/regional LV dilation/dysfunction - reduced closing forces; (2) Papillary muscle displacement with leaflet tethering (outweighs closing forces); (3) Annular dilation/dysfunction; (4) Inadequate leaflet adaptation to ventricular or atrial enlargement
- Anatomic predictors of severity and recurrence after repair: leaflet tethering/restricted closure, asymmetric papillary muscle displacement, decreased interpapillary distance, increased LV sphericity
Clinical Presentation
- Patients often present with heart failure symptoms (dyspnea, fatigue, orthopnea); MR may be detected incidentally
- AF is common
- Systolic murmur of secondary MR related to LV dilation is often softer and shorter than in primary MR (due to reduced driving pressure in the failing ventricle)
- An apical S3 is a common finding
- Secondary pulmonary hypertension is common with severe MR, leading to right-sided HF signs (raised JVP, peripheral edema, TR murmur)
Management of Secondary MR
Medical (first-line):
- ACEi/ARBs, beta-blockers, diuretics for HF symptoms and LV remodeling
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for patients with LBBB and LVEF ≤35% - may reduce secondary MR by improving LV synchrony and geometry
- Rhythm/rate control of AF
Surgical:
- More controversial than primary MR - surgery improves MR but does not reliably improve LV function or long-term outcomes in secondary MR
- Surgical repair (ring annuloplasty) has high recurrence rate (~60% at 5 years) in ischemic MR
- MVR may be preferred over repair in some secondary MR scenarios given high repair recurrence
Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (TEER - MitraClip):
- COAPT trial (most important trial for secondary MR): In patients with HF and moderate-to-severe or severe secondary MR who remained symptomatic despite maximally tolerated GDMT (mean age 72 years), TEER resulted in significantly lower rate of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality over mean 24-month follow-up vs. medical therapy alone
- FDA-approved for heart failure patients with LV dysfunction and secondary MR despite optimal medical therapy
- MitraClip replicates the Alfieri edge-to-edge stitch technique, creating a double-orifice MV
- 2020 ACC/AHA guidelines: TEER is recommended (Class IIa) for symptomatic severe secondary MR despite GDMT in patients with LVEF 20-50%, LVESD ≤70 mm, and anatomy favorable for repair
Braunwald's Heart Disease, p. 784
ACUTE MITRAL REGURGITATION
Causes
- Spontaneous rupture of chordae tendineae (most common)
- Infective endocarditis with leaflet/chordal disruption
- Ischemic papillary muscle rupture - complicating acute MI (especially posteromedial papillary muscle, supplied by single coronary artery)
- Malfunction of prosthetic valve
- Trauma
Pathophysiology and Clinical Features
Acute severe MR is a hemodynamic emergency with several features that distinguish it from chronic MR:
- LA is normal-sized (low compliance) → LA pressure rises abruptly → acute pulmonary edema
- Marked elevation of v wave in LA/pulmonary artery tracing
- Forward stroke volume drops sharply; right heart failure develops
Key physical examination differences vs. chronic MR:
- Murmur may be decrescendo rather than holosystolic - as elevated LA v wave reduces LV-LA gradient in late systole, murmur ends before A2
- Murmur is usually lower-pitched and softer than chronic MR
- Left-sided S4 is frequently present
- Pulmonary hypertension → loud P2, pulmonary regurgitation murmur, TR murmur, right-sided S4
- Paradoxical splitting of S2 may rarely occur (elevated LA v wave causes premature pulmonary valve closure and early P2)
- Chest X-ray: only mild cardiac enlargement or normal heart size despite severe hemodynamic compromise (no time for compensatory dilation); marked pulmonary edema
- Echo: Minimal LV/LA dilation despite severe MR; elevated PASP; characteristic triangular CW Doppler profile (vs. parabolic in chronic MR) due to early cessation of regurgitation
Management of Acute MR
Medical stabilization:
- IV nitroprusside - afterload reduction is critical; reduces regurgitant fraction and improves forward output; may be lifesaving in papillary muscle rupture complicating acute MI
- If hypotensive: add dobutamine (inotrope) with nitroprusside
- Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) - to stabilize the patient hemodynamically while preparing for surgery (reduces afterload, augments diastolic coronary perfusion)
Definitive treatment: Surgery
- Emergency MVR (with resection of ruptured papillary muscle and infarct zone if post-MI) is the treatment of choice
- Emergency surgery carries higher mortality than elective surgery for chronic MR, but mortality without surgery in acute severe MR with HF is extremely high
- Surgery should not be delayed unless the patient can be rapidly stabilized
Braunwald's Heart Disease, pp. 1470-1471
TRANSCATHETER THERAPY (Summary)
Surgery for MR carries 1-5% mortality (higher in elderly, those with LV dysfunction). Transcatheter approaches developed to address this:
| Device/Approach | Target | Trial | Status |
|---|
| MitraClip (TEER) | Leaflet (edge-to-edge repair) | EVEREST II (primary MR), COAPT (secondary MR), MITRA-FR | FDA-approved; CE Mark |
| Annuloplasty devices (Cardioband, Carillon) | Annulus | Various | CE Mark / investigational |
| Transcatheter MV replacement (TMVR) | Full valve | Evolving | Investigational |
Key Numbers to Remember
| Parameter | Threshold / Value |
|---|
| Severe primary MR: EROA | ≥0.40 cm² |
| Severe primary MR: Rvol | ≥60 mL |
| Severe primary MR: RF | ≥50% |
| Surgery indicated if LVEF | ≤60% |
| Surgery indicated if LVESD | ≥40 mm |
| Normal LVEF in MR (compensated) | >65-70% (supranormal expected) |
| MVP echocardiographic criteria | >2 mm displacement beyond annulus, >5 mm leaflet thickness |
| MVP prevalence | ~2-3% |
| MR prevalence in elderly (≥75 yr) | >10% moderate or greater |
Clinical Stages of Primary MR (ACC/AHA)
| Stage | Description |
|---|
| A | At risk (MVP without MR) |
| B | Progressive (mild-moderate MR, no symptoms, normal LV) |
| C1 | Severe asymptomatic, preserved LV (LVEF >60%, LVESD <40 mm) |
| C2 | Severe asymptomatic, with LV dysfunction (LVEF ≤60% or LVESD ≥40 mm) |
| D | Severe symptomatic |
All content sourced from: Braunwald's Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 12th Edition (ISBN: 9780323722193), Chapter 76 (Mitral Regurgitation) and Chapter 78 (Transcatheter Therapies for Valvular Heart Disease).