Vertebroplasty
Vertebroplasty is a minimally invasive percutaneous procedure in which bone cement (polymethylmethacrylate, PMMA) is injected into a fractured or weakened vertebral body to relieve pain and stabilize the bone - Gray's Anatomy for Students, p. 91.
How it's done
Under fluoroscopic (and sometimes CT) guidance, a needle/cannula is passed through the vertebral pedicle into the vertebral body, and liquid cement is injected. As the cement hardens it:
- Restores mechanical strength to the vertebral body, preventing further height loss
- Generates heat during polymerization, which is thought to disrupt local pain nerve endings
A related technique, kyphoplasty, first inflates a balloon in the vertebral body to create a cavity and partially restore lost height before injecting a more viscous cement - Grainger & Allison's Diagnostic Radiology, p. 1087.
Indications
- Painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (the most common indication), ideally treated within 4-6 weeks of symptom onset in patients with severe pain requiring opioids or hospitalization
- Painful vertebral metastases or multiple myeloma
- Kümmell's disease
- Painful vertebral hemangiomas
Patient selection matters: pain should correlate temporally with the fracture, and MRI (fluid-sensitive/fat-suppressed sequences showing marrow edema) helps confirm an acute, "actionable" fracture rather than an old, healed one - Grainger & Allison's Diagnostic Radiology, p. 1087.
Effectiveness
Reported pain relief rates range from 70-95% for osteoporotic fractures. Benefits cited include earlier hospital discharge, lower readmission, and in some studies reduced mortality when performed within 6 weeks of fracture - Grainger & Allison's Diagnostic Radiology, p. 1087.
Important caveat: Not all evidence is favorable. Two well-known blinded, sham-controlled randomized trials found no benefit of vertebroplasty over a placebo (sham) procedure for painful osteoporotic compression fractures, which sparked ongoing controversy about how much of the benefit is a placebo/regression-to-mean effect versus a true treatment effect - Firestein & Kelley's Textbook of Rheumatology, p. 2112-2127. A 2023 systematic review specifically examined how the choice of control group (sham vs. usual care) shapes these divergent results (Eneling et al., PMID 36566694).
Complications (~1% overall serious complication rate, no reported procedural mortality)
- Needle-related: pedicle fracture, needle breakage, pneumothorax, hemorrhage, spinal infection
- Cement-related: nerve root or cord compression, pulmonary cement embolism, cement leakage into epidural/foraminal/paravertebral veins
- Procedure-related: fat embolism, adjacent rib or new vertebral fracture (about 10% of patients develop a new compression fracture, often at an adjacent level)
- Sedation/anesthesia-related: respiratory or cardiac arrest, airway injury
- Drug-related: allergic reaction
Complication rates are notably higher in malignant/tumor cases (up to 10%) and vertebral hemangiomas (2-5%) than in osteoporotic fractures (1-3%).
Vertebroplasty vs. kyphoplasty
Meta-analyses comparing the two find similar pain and disability outcomes, no difference in symptomatic cement leakage, but kyphoplasty tends to have lower overall (asymptomatic) leakage rates and better restoration of vertebral height/kyphosis correction - Grainger & Allison's Diagnostic Radiology, p. 1087. This is consistent with more recent meta-analyses (e.g., Daher et al. 2023, PMID 36455843).
Recent evidence (last 2-3 years)
- A 2025 systematic review/meta-analysis compared newer "curved" (unipedicular, bilateral cement distribution) vertebroplasty techniques against standard unipedicular approaches, generally favoring the curved technique for better cement distribution and pain outcomes (PMID 40342107, 37839572).
- A 2024 meta-analysis of RCTs comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty to nonoperative treatment continues to show mixed results depending on control group design, reinforcing the sham-controlled-trial controversy noted above (PMID 39053849).
If you want, I can go deeper into any specific angle - e.g., the sham-trial controversy, technique/anesthesia details, or oncologic (metastatic) use.