MD Anaesthesiology – Model Answer
Q1. What is METs? Recent guidelines for assessment of functional capacity in a patient with coronary stents in-situ, and role of cardiac biomarkers [2+4+4]
A. What is METs? (2 marks)
MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task) is a unit used to quantify a patient's functional/exercise capacity.
- 1 MET = resting oxygen consumption of an average 40-year-old, 70-kg adult = 3.5 mL O₂/kg/min
- Functional capacity is graded as multiples of this baseline (e.g., walking on level ground ≈ 2-3 METs; climbing 2 flights of stairs or heavy housework ≈ 4-5 METs; strenuous sports, e.g., swimming, singles tennis ≈ >10 METs)
- ≥4 METs is the clinically critical cut-off - patients who can achieve this without symptoms (angina, dyspnea) have a low risk of perioperative cardiac events and generally do not need further cardiac testing before intermediate/high-risk noncardiac surgery
- Poor functional capacity (<4 METs) has a bidirectional relationship with cardiopulmonary disease and independently predicts perioperative mortality, cardiac and pulmonary complications (Mulholland & Greenfield's Surgery, p. 250; Sabiston Textbook of Surgery)
B. Recent guidelines for assessment of functional capacity (with coronary stents in-situ) (4 marks)
1. Move away from unstructured subjective interview
Traditionally anesthesiologists asked open-ended questions about activity during the PAC. This is unreliable - in a large multicenter cohort (the METS study, ~1400 patients), subjective clinician assessment had only 19% sensitivity and 95% specificity for detecting inability to reach ≥4 METs on formal exercise testing, and did not improve prediction of postoperative morbidity/mortality (Miller's Anesthesia, 10e, Ch. 28).
2. Current (2024 AHA/ACC/multisociety) approach - structured/validated tools
| Tool | Method | Cut-off for adequate capacity |
|---|
| Structured questions | "Can you walk 4 blocks or climb 2 flights of stairs?" | Inability = high-risk marker |
| Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) | 12-item self-administered questionnaire; VO₂peak (mL/kg/min) = (0.43 × DASI) + 9.6; METs = VO₂peak ÷ 3.5 | DASI score ≥34 correlates with ≥4 METs; found superior to subjective clinician assessment for predicting postoperative death/MI/stroke |
| MET-REPAIR questionnaire | Validated in patients with high cardiovascular burden | ≥6 METs on this tool corresponds to adequate reserve |
| Objective testing (CPET, stress echo) | For discordant or high-risk cases before major surgery | VO₂ max threshold |
The 2024 AHA/ACC Perioperative Cardiovascular Guideline (updating the 2014 version) formalizes this into the risk algorithm: it recommends assessing functional capacity using either the ≥4 MET threshold or a DASI score, in preference to unstructured subjective questioning, as the pivotal branch point deciding whether further cardiac workup is needed before elevated-risk noncardiac surgery.
3. Specific relevance to the patient with coronary stents in-situ
- Functional capacity assessment must be interpreted alongside stent-specific timing rules, because in these patients the decision is not only "fit vs unfit for surgery" but also "safe timing after PCI":
- Balloon angioplasty alone → delay elective NCS ≥14 days
- Bare-metal stent (BMS) → delay ≥30 days (up to 3 months per newer data)
- Drug-eluting stent (DES) for chronic coronary disease → delay ≥6 months (ideally 12 months)
- DES for acute coronary syndrome → delay ≥12 months; complex DES (bifurcation, long/multivessel) may also warrant 12 months
- If surgery cannot be delayed, a multidisciplinary discussion (anesthesiologist, cardiologist, surgeon) is mandatory to weigh stent thrombosis risk (from interrupting DAPT) against surgical bleeding risk (from continuing DAPT); aspirin is usually continued perioperatively when possible, with only the P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel/ticagrelor/prasugrel) interrupted for the shortest safe interval.
- Good functional capacity (≥4 METs / DASI ≥34) in a stented patient supports proceeding without additional noninvasive cardiac testing, provided the PCI-to-surgery interval and antiplatelet plan are appropriate. Poor functional capacity in this population should prompt biomarker testing and/or cardiology referral rather than routine revascularization (prophylactic PCI/CABG has not been shown to improve perioperative outcomes in patients with stable CAD).
C. Role of cardiac biomarkers in this patient (4 marks)
The 2024 AHA/ACC guideline introduces biomarker-based risk stratification as a new step in the perioperative algorithm - a change from the 2014 guideline, which did not endorse routine biomarker testing.
Indications for biomarker testing:
- Known cardiovascular disease (including prior coronary stent)
- Age >65 years
- Age 45-64 years with symptoms/signs suggestive of CVD
- Patients with elevated risk undergoing elevated-risk noncardiac surgery, especially those with poor or unknown functional capacity
Biomarkers used:
| Biomarker | Recommendation strength (2024 ACC/AHA) | Utility |
|---|
| NT-proBNP / BNP | Class 2a (preferred by ACC/AHA) | Reflects ventricular wall stress; predicts perioperative cardiac events and MACE |
| Cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) | Class 2b by ACC/AHA (preferred by ESC) | Marker of myocardial injury; baseline value for comparison with postoperative surveillance |
Application in this patient:
- Preoperative: If natriuretic peptide/troponin is normal, the patient is classified low-risk and no further cardiac testing is needed even with borderline functional capacity. If elevated, a multidisciplinary team should discuss further cardiac evaluation (e.g., stress testing, cardiology input) before proceeding, since elevated baseline biomarkers combined with a stent history raise concern for silent ischemia, in-stent restenosis, or reduced cardiac reserve.
- Postoperative: Troponin surveillance is recommended in high-risk patients (including those with coronary stents) to detect myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS), which is often asymptomatic but carries significant 30-day mortality risk. A rise in postoperative troponin above baseline should trigger cardiology consultation, ECG, and evaluation for perioperative MI versus other causes of injury (e.g., stent thrombosis).
- Biomarkers thus complement, not replace, functional capacity assessment - a patient with a coronary stent, poor exercise tolerance, and elevated NT-proBNP/troponin represents the highest-risk group warranting the most cautious perioperative plan (staged surgery, invasive monitoring, ICU-level postoperative care), whereas normal biomarkers with good functional capacity allow safe progression to surgery once the stent-appropriate waiting period has elapsed.
Exam tip - structure your answer as:
- Define MET with the numeric value (2 marks - quick, precise)
- Guidelines: subjective vs structured/validated tools (DASI, MET-REPAIR) → 2024 AHA/ACC algorithm → stent-timing table → DAPT/multidisciplinary decision (4 marks)
- Biomarkers: indications → NT-proBNP vs troponin → pre-op decision node → post-op MINS surveillance (4 marks)
Key sources: Miller's Anesthesia, 10th ed. (Ch. 28, "Assessment of Functional Capacity" and "Patients With Coronary Artery Stents"); Barash, Cullen & Stoelting's Clinical Anesthesia, 9e (Ch. on cardiovascular disease and stents); Fuster and Hurst's The Heart, 15e (Perioperative Testing, Aspirin and DAPT); Sabiston Textbook of Surgery (Functional Assessment, DASI); 2024 AHA/ACC/multisociety Perioperative Cardiovascular Guideline (Circulation, 2024).
Recent-evidence note: A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis (
Takahashi et al., Anaesthesia, PMID: 39853751) confirms that subjective functional capacity assessment correlates only modestly with postoperative outcomes, reinforcing why the 2024 guideline shifted toward DASI/validated tools - this is consistent with the answer above, no contradiction found.