NEUROTRANSMITTER PET AD is strongly associated with neurotransmitter dysfunction, particularly of the cholinergic sys tem.81 Cholinergic impairment and loss of neurons are seen in the basal forebrain, whereas striatal in terneurons and innervation of the thalamus are relatively preserved.82 This has motivated the clin ical approval of several cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of AD.83 By visualizing the func tion of neurons and their neurotransmitters at a molecular level, PET may offer novel insights into AD-associated neuropathy and its impact on cognitive and functional outcomes. Several developed PET radiotracers targeting the cholinergic system, such as N-[11C] methyl 4-piperidinyl propionate ([11C] PMP) and N-[11C] methyl-4-piperidyl acetate ([11C] MP4A), are spe cific to the enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE) that functions to increase acetylcholine turn over.84,85 Imaging with these radiotracers has revealed reductions in AChE activity in regions such as the neocortex, hippocampus, and amyg dala in AD patients, with the temporal and parietal cortices being the most affected.86 This aligns with the pattern of temporo-parietal hypometabolism observed in FDG scans. A separate study using MP4A PET demonstrated that the patients with AD at various disease stages present with reduced AChE binding in the temporal cortex.87 While EOAD patients displayed global reductions in AChE,thosewith LOADshowedreductionsmainly in specific cortical regions. Notably, EOAD pa tients exhibited more pronounced AChE reduc tions than LOAD patients, suggesting that AChE may be of therapeutic interest particularly for EOAD. In a study of the PET ligand (1)-[18F] flubatine, which assesses nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) activity, AD patients showed reduced bindingof(1)-[18F]flubatineinseveralbrainregions including the left hippocampus, precuneus, puta men, right anterior orbital frontal cortex, right para central lobule, left anterior cingulate cortex, and left triangular inferior frontal gyrus (Fig. 3).88 The most pronounced reductions were observed in the bilateral mesial temporal cortices. Additionally, there was a negative correlation between (1)-[18F] flubatine binding in the lateral temporal cortex and Ab deposition in cortical regions, possibly due to amyloid-induceddamagetoassociatedneuronalfi bers. However,theauthorsnotedthatthisexplana tion was specific to the lateral temporal region and did not apply to other observed cortical regions. Downloaded for Dr Harini K (dr.koormaharini@aighospitals.com) at AIG Hospitals from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on May 23, 2026. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2026. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. PET Imaging in Alzheimer’s Disease 95 A separate study involving 9 AD patients, 8 MCI patients,and7age-matchedhealthycontrolsexam ined the binding of the PET radiopharmaceutical 2 [18F] FA-85380 BP(ND), which also measures nAChRactivity.89 The study found reduced binding of 2-[18F] FA-85380 BP(ND) correlating with the severity of cognitive impairment. Importantly, only MCI patients who later progressed to AD showed reduced binding, suggesting that PET imaging of nAChR may not only reflect cognitive impairment severity but also predict disease progression. Beyond the cholinergic system, PET has been applied to explore AD-associated changes in the serotonergic system, which governs fundamental behaviors including mood, sleep, and cognition.90 PET studies have demonstrated reductions in the cerebral serotonin transporter (5-HTT), 5-HT1A re ceptor, and 5-HT2A receptor among patients with AD. For instance, a study of [18F] setoperone (5 HT2A receptor antagonist) showed decreased uptake in various cortical regions, including the temporoparietal and frontal areas, of 9 AD patients compared with controls.91 A separate analysis by Ouchi and colleagues revealed striatal 5-HTT re ductions in 8 nondepressed AD patients relative to controls, indicating presynaptic cholinergic al terations before the onset of emotional or psychi atric manifestations.92 During a 2-year follow-up of MCI patients, 8 out of 14 initially diagnosed subjects met probable AD criteria, but no significant changes in 5-HT2A re ceptor binding were observed compared with baseline values.93 The authors of this study, there fore, concluded that reduced 5-HT2A receptor binding in MCI patients occurs slowly and is not associated with progression to AD. These findings suggest that decreased cortical 5-HT2A receptor binding may be an early feature in MCI, but addi tional reductions are not linked to MCI-to-AD pro gression. Similar to the observations with 5-HT2A receptors, a notable reduction in the binding po tential of 5-HT1A receptors has been observed in AD patients compared with healthy controls confined to the medial temporal lobe.94 In contrast, a separate study on 5-HT1A PET in AD and MCI patients revealed significant reduc tions in 5-HT1A receptor densities in the bilateral hippocampi and raphe nuclei of AD patients.95 The authors further reported that decreased 5-HT1A receptor binding in the hippocampus strongly correlated with deteriorating cognition, as assessed by MMSE scores, and reduced cere bral glucose metabolism, as measured by FDG PET. A voxel-based analysis of 5-HT1A receptor density using PET also showed decreased whole brain binding in AD patients, while patients with amnestic MCI (aMCI) exhibited increased binding.96 Further regional analysis revealed that AD patients had reduced 5-HT1A receptor binding in the hippocampus and parahippocampus, whereas aMCI patients showed increased binding in the inferior occipital gyrus. These findings sug gest that PET imaging of 5-HT1A receptor binding could potentially differentiate aMCI patients from those with mild AD. Given the need to differentiate AD from Parkin son’s dementia, DLB, and depression, a common finding in AD patients, PET imaging of the dopami nergic system has received increased attention. [11C] raclopride PET has been used to study dopamine D2 receptor availability, demonstrating reduced hippocampal binding in patients with AD and correlating with severity of memory impair ment.97 However, other studies of [18F] AV-133 (florbenazine), a tracer of the dopaminergic vesic ular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2), reported mixed or negative findings on dopaminergic degeneration in patients with AD.98,99 A small study of 27 MCI patients explored the diagnostic utility of PET by comparing striatal dopa mineterminalintegritymeasuredby[11C]dihydrote trabenazine and cerebral amyloid burden measured by [11C] PiB.100 The study classified 11 subjects as amnestic MCI,7asmultidomainMCI,and9asnon amnesticMCIbasedoninitialclinicaldiagnoses.Ata meanfollow-upof3years,cerebralamyloiddeposi tion or nigrostriatal denervation strongly predicted MCI-to-dementia conversion. However, PET based subtype classification only moderately agreed with clinical subtype classification. PET IN AD THERAPEUTICS PET imaging holds significant potential for evalu ating therapeutic interventions for AD. In recent years, there has been a surge in efforts to develop pharmaceutical and immunologically mediated therapies for AD.101 In the context of patient man agement, PET imaging can be employed before treatment to identify promising therapies and targets for individual patients. Additionally, longi tudinal PET scans can assess a therapy’s effec tiveness and mechanism of action over time. An example of the utility of PET in evaluating pharma cologic therapy is its role in understanding done pezil’s impact on AChE activity.102 Contrary to earlier beliefs that donepezil achieves nearly total inhibition of cerebral cortical AChE activity in pa tients with AD, Kuhl and colleagues showed an average AChE activity inhibition of only 27% following donepezil administration.102 Moreover, an amyloid PET study by Pyun and colleagues found no significant association between AChE in hibitor activity and amyloid burden or cognitive Downloaded for Dr Harini K (dr.koormaharini@aighospitals.com) at AIG Hospitals from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on May 23, 2026. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2026. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 96 Patil et al decline in AD patients.103 These insights highlight PET’s role in elucidating AD mechanisms, guiding clinical trial development, and ensuring appro priate pharmaceutical use. In the domain of AD immunotherapy, PET imag ing has been used to assess the efficacy of vac cines targeting immunologic responses against amyloid protein. For instance, [18F] florbetapir PET was utilized to assess amyloid burden in a phase 2 randomized control trial of an experi mental vaccine for AD, known as vanutide cridifi car (ACC-001) combined with Quillaja saponaria (QS-21).104 The study revealed that neither of the vaccine-administered groups showed significant reductions in amyloid burden or clinical improve ments compared with the controls. Intriguingly, participants who received either vaccine dose experienced a faster decline in brain volume. This research challenges the utility of detecting amyloid in the brain for developing effective thera pies and questions the use of amyloid burden as a clinical progression indicator. This issue gained further attention due to the controversy surrounding the FDA’s approval of aducanumab, an anti-amyloid monoclonal anti body, as a clinical treatment for AD. Amyloid PET imaging was instrumental in evaluating aducanu mab’s impact on amyloid burden in AD patients during the EMERGE and ENGAGE trial experi mental arms.105 However, no clear clinical benefit was observed from the divergent evidence pre sented in these trials.106 Clinical trials of lecanemab and donanemab have claimed the clinical benefit of reducing cognitive decline by 27% and 36% over 18 months of treatment, respectively.107,108 For lecanemab, the reported effect on the primary endpoint was a difference of 0.45 on the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) scale. For donanemab, the reported effect was a differ ence of 3.25 on the integrated Alzheimer’s Dis ease Rating Scale (iADRS), a difference of 0.67 in CDR-SB, and adifference of 0.48 to 0.57 points on the MMSE. These results, however, may not have true clinical significance for patients, as a separate study estimated a change of 1 to 2 points in the CDR-SB as a minimal clinically important difference.109 Moreover, greater differ ences in the CDR-SB and MMSE have been achieved with conventional AD therapy.110–112 A recent study used [18F] florbetaben PET to assess changes in Ab plaque deposition of 3 pa tients with mild AD participating in focused ultra sound blood–brain barrier opening, a novel technique to optimize delivery of adacanumab over a 6-month period.113 While the protocol achieved significant reductions in Ab deposition, there were no significant changes in cognitive or behavioral outcomes. Nonetheless, this study pre sents a promising proof-of-concept of drug deliv ery as assessed by PET imaging and its potential implications for AD. The controversial performance of anti-amyloid therapeutics underscores the need to contextu alize PET imaging, especially when many amyloid radiotracers remain prone to nonspecific bind ing.66 Further research is required to determine the optimal imaging techniques for assessing AD progression and identifying the most effective therapeutic targets for AD treatment. explain in simple terms
| System | What PET Shows in AD |
|---|---|
| Acetylcholine (AChE) | Reduced activity, worst in temporal/parietal lobes |
| Nicotinic receptors | Reduced, may predict progression from MCI to AD |
| Serotonin (5-HT) | Reduced in multiple receptor types; 5-HT1A loss tracks cognition |
| Dopamine | Reduced D2 receptors in hippocampus; helps distinguish AD from DLB |
how does dopamine sstem distinguish from AD to parkinsoins dementia and LBD
dopamine PET imaging differential diagnosis Alzheimer Parkinson Lewy body dementia
dopamine PET SPECT DAT scan differentiate Alzheimer Parkinson dementia Lewy body DLB nigrostriatal
| Feature | AD | Parkinson's Dementia (PDD) | DLB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Substantia nigra neurons | Largely intact | Massively destroyed | Significantly lost |
| DAT scan result | Normal (bright commas) | Abnormal (faded/absent) | Abnormal (faded/absent) |
| Dopamine loss pattern | Minimal | Severe, starts in putamen | Severe, similar to PD |
| Main pathological protein | Amyloid + tau | Alpha-synuclein (Lewy bodies) | Alpha-synuclein (Lewy bodies) |
| Motor symptoms timing | Late or mild | Motor symptoms first (>1 yr before dementia) | Dementia first OR simultaneous |
A normal (preserved) DAT scan = NOT PDD or DLB. It points toward AD.
| Imaging Tool | AD | PDD | DLB |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDG-PET (metabolism) | Temporal/parietal hypometabolism | Frontal, parietal, occipital loss | Prominent occipital hypometabolism (most distinctive) |
| Amyloid PET | Strongly positive | Variable | Variable |
| MRI atrophy | Hippocampal + medial temporal | Less medial temporal atrophy | Relative preservation of medial temporal lobe |
| MIBG cardiac scan | Normal | Abnormal (heart denervation) | Abnormal |
why amyloid pet variable in PDD nad DLBD
amyloid PET DLB Parkinson dementia copathology variable
why is amyloid PET variable in DLB Parkinson dementia PDD co-pathology alpha-synuclein
why amyloid PET variable PDD DLB copathology alpha-synuclein interaction
AD = amyloid + tau (defining features) PDD/DLB = alpha-synuclein (defining feature) ± amyloid (optional, variable co-passenger)
| Feature | AD | DLB | PDD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Defining protein | Amyloid + tau | Alpha-synuclein | Alpha-synuclein |
| Amyloid PET | Always positive (diagnostic) | Variable - positive in ~70% | Variable - positive in ~30-40% |
| Amyloid role | Primary disease driver | Contributing co-pathology | Minor co-pathology in most |
| APOE ε4 influence | Strong | Strong (amplifies amyloid co-load) | Moderate |
| If amyloid PET positive in DLB/PDD... | - | Worse prognosis, faster decline, phenotype shifts closer to AD | Shorter time to dementia, less rest tremor |
MIBG CARDIAC SCAN IN pdd EXPLAIN IN DETAIL and in DLBD
MIBG myocardial scintigraphy Parkinson disease dementia Lewy body diagnosis
123I-MIBG cardiac scan PDD Parkinson dementia DLB Lewy body mechanism heart sympathetic denervation explained
MIBG cardiac scan mechanism PDD DLB H/M ratio sensitivity specificity
MIBG scintigraphy Lewy body dementia DLB sensitivity specificity diagnosis
MIBG H/M ratio early delayed phase DLB vs PDD vs AD normal values interpretation
Alpha-synuclein aggregates
↓
Lewy bodies form in peripheral sympathetic ganglia
(especially the stellate ganglion, paravertebral ganglia)
↓
Postganglionic cardiac sympathetic axons degenerate
↓
Heart muscle loses its sympathetic innervation
↓
MIBG cannot bind → reduced uptake on scan
| H/M Ratio | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| >2.0-2.2 | Normal - sympathetic innervation intact |
| <2.0-2.1 | Abnormal - denervation present |
| ~1.3-1.7 | Severely reduced - typical of PDD/DLB |
| DLB Subtype | Where Synuclein Starts | Cardiac MIBG |
|---|---|---|
| Body-first DLB | Peripheral nerves/gut first, then brain | Abnormal early - reduced MIBG |
| Brain-first DLB | Brain/olfactory first, then periphery | May be normal or only mildly reduced |
| Feature | AD | PDD | DLB |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIBG uptake | Normal | Reduced | Reduced |
| H/M ratio (delayed) | >2.0 (normal) | ~1.51-1.70 (low) | ~1.28-1.47 (very low) |
| Differentiate from AD? | - | Yes - excellent | Yes - excellent |
| Differentiate PDD vs DLB? | - | Not reliable | Not reliable |
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Cardiac disease | Heart failure, ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy |
| Metabolic/Endocrine | Diabetes mellitus (diabetic cardiac neuropathy), pheochromocytoma |
| Peripheral neuropathies | Diabetic neuropathy, amyloid neuropathy |
| Drugs | Sympathomimetics, tricyclic antidepressants, labetalol, calcium channel blockers |
| Other synucleinopathies | Pure autonomic failure (PAF) - also shows very low MIBG |
| Clinical Question | Best Tool |
|---|---|
| Is this AD or DLB? | MIBG + DAT SPECT (combined: 93.9% sensitivity) |
| Is this PD or MSA? | MIBG (MSA has intact postganglionic nerves) |
| Is this DLB or PDD? | Clinical 1-year rule + FDG-PET (occipital hypometabolism favors DLB) |
| Monitoring disease progression | MIBG washout rate over time |
The heart's sympathetic nerves are killed by Lewy bodies in both PDD and DLB. MIBG is essentially a radioactive "norepinephrine" that cannot find a home in the heart when those nerves are dead - so the scan shows a dark, cold heart instead of a bright one.This makes MIBG a powerful tool to confirm Lewy body disease (by separating it cleanly from AD, MSA, PSP, and vascular dementia), but it cannot separate PDD from DLB because both diseases kill the same nerves.The best diagnostic approach combines MIBG with DAT SPECT for maximum sensitivity (93.9%), and adds clinical timing of symptoms to distinguish PDD from DLB.