Interpretation
Reading File
analyse_media
The analyse_media tool returned a partial/truncated result. Let me read the ECG directly from the image provided - I can see it clearly in the visual input.
Based on what I can see in the ECG image and the printed header data, here is my interpretation:
ECG Interpretation
Machine-Reported Measurements (from printout header)
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| P axis | -- |
| QRS axis | 64° |
| T axis | 56 |
| QRS | 62 ms |
| Lead type | 12-Lead Standard Placement |
| Speed | 25 mm/sec |
| Limb gain | 10 mm/mV |
| Chest gain | 10.0 mm/mV |
Rate
- Estimated heart rate appears to be around 60-75 bpm based on R-R intervals at 25 mm/sec paper speed.
Rhythm
- Regular rhythm
- P waves appear present before each QRS complex, suggesting normal sinus rhythm.
Axis
- QRS axis = +64° - this is within the normal range (normal: -30° to +90°).
P Waves
- Present and upright in leads I and II - consistent with normal sinus origin.
PR Interval
- Appears normal (~120-200 ms) - no significant prolongation visible.
QRS Complex
- QRS duration = 62 ms - this is narrow (normal <120 ms), ruling out bundle branch block.
- No significant Q waves or LVH voltage criteria apparent.
ST Segments
- Isoelectric in all leads - no ST elevation or depression identified.
T Waves
- Appear upright in lateral leads (I, aVL, V4-V6).
- T waves in V1-V3 appear relatively flat/low amplitude - this can be a normal variant.
Specific Lead Findings
- aVR: Typically inverted P and T waves - appears consistent with normal.
- Precordial leads (V1-V6): Normal R-wave progression expected.
Summary / Impression
Normal Sinus Rhythm with no acute ischemic changes.
- Sinus rhythm at a normal rate
- Normal QRS axis (+64°)
- Narrow QRS (62 ms) - no conduction defect
- No ST elevation or depression
- No pathological Q waves identified
- No LVH or RVH pattern
No acute ST-elevation MI (STEMI) pattern. No bundle branch block. No arrhythmia.
Note: This interpretation is for educational purposes only. All ECGs require clinical correlation and should be reviewed by a qualified physician in the context of the patient's symptoms, history, and vitals. This image has some quality limitations (paper crease, angle) that may obscure fine details.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.