I m planning to develop a tool that's clot detector using near infrared and UST through visualization will it works
near infrared spectroscopy ultrasound thrombus detection
near infrared ultrasound combined clot detection tool feasibility 2024 2025
deep vein thrombosis NIR optical imaging detection
https://eurointervention.pcronline.com/article/combined-nirs…
PMID: 36653196
| Property | Near-Infrared (NIR) | Ultrasound (UST) |
|---|---|---|
| What it detects | Biochemical composition (hemoglobin, fibrin, lipid) | Mechanical structure (echogenicity, stiffness, geometry) |
| Depth penetration | 1-10 mm (tissue-limited by scattering) | Several centimeters |
| Resolution | High (sub-mm with NIR-II) | Moderate (depends on frequency) |
| Clot information | Age, composition, oxygenation state | Size, location, flow obstruction |
| Limitation | Poor depth in whole blood | Poor soft-tissue contrast |
| Challenge | Details | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| NIR penetration depth | Whole blood strongly scatters NIR; useful depth ~5-10 mm without contrast agents | Use NIR-II window (1000-1350 nm); consider photoacoustic mode |
| Clot age discrimination | Fresh clot (red, oxyhemoglobin-rich) vs old clot (pale, fibrin-dominant) have different NIR spectra | Multi-wavelength NIR (3-5 wavelengths) + spectral unmixing algorithm |
| Motion artifacts | Cardiac pulsations, breathing, patient movement | Gated acquisition; real-time motion compensation |
| Fibrin vs lipid discrimination | Both absorb NIR but at different wavelengths | Principal component analysis on spectral data |
| Co-registration accuracy | NIR and UST see different tissue depths | Rigid registration with shared fiducial markers |
| Regulatory pathway | FDA/CE for novel combination modality | Substantial equivalence pathway to existing IVUS or duplex Doppler |
Will this really work and what to add for presentation if it's probelm statement and solution with titke
deep vein thrombosis diagnosis delay mortality statistics
DVT pulmonary embolism missed diagnosis statistics clinical burden 2024
DualSense Clot Detector: A Combined Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Ultrasound System for Real-Time Thrombus Detection and Characterization
Non-invasive, bedside visualization of blood clots using bimodal optical-acoustic imaging
Current standard of care (compression duplex ultrasound) detects the location of a clot but tells us almost nothing about its composition, age, or instability - the very factors that determine treatment urgency and embolism risk.
| Tool | What it shows | What it misses |
|---|---|---|
| Compression Duplex Ultrasound | Location, vessel occlusion | Clot age, composition, embolism risk |
| CT Pulmonary Angiography | PE confirmation | Expensive, radiation, not portable |
| D-Dimer Blood Test | Clot presence (indirect) | Non-specific; 50% false positive rate |
| MRI Venography | Detailed anatomy | Expensive, slow, not bedside |
| NIRS-IVUS Catheter (existing) | Plaque composition in coronary arteries | Invasive, coronary use only |
A handheld, non-invasive probe that combines Near-Infrared Spectroscopy with Ultrasound imaging to detect, locate, and characterize blood clots in real time at the bedside.
| Challenge | Impact | Our Approach |
|---|---|---|
| NIR depth limited to ~10 mm in whole blood | Misses deep iliac/femoral clots | Photoacoustic mode extends depth; UST handles deep vessels |
| Motion artifacts | Blurs co-registration | Respiratory/cardiac gating algorithm |
| Patient body habitus | Obesity increases depth requirement | Adaptive probe pressure + lower frequency (1-3 MHz) |
| Fibrin vs lipid spectral overlap | Misclassification | 5-wavelength spectral unmixing algorithm |
| Regulatory pathway | 2-4 year FDA process | 510(k) substantial equivalence to existing NIRS + existing IVUS |
Blood clots kill when they are missed or mischaracterized. Current tools show where a clot is. DualSense shows where it is, what it is made of, and how dangerous it is - non-invasively, at the bedside, in real time.